Previous research has shown a left-to-right bias in the inhibition-of-return effect. This bias was found in a sample of English-speaking participants who read in a predominantly left-to-right manner. The goal of the current study was to examine the role that the direction of text reading plays in this bias. The findings replicated the left-to-right bias with an English sample, but showed the opposite bias in an Arabic sample, who read text from right to left. Thus, the regularity of shifting attention in a particular way during text reading seems to be the cause of the bias observed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrazeltonT.SchollM.RobeyJ. (1966). Visual responses in the newborn. Pediatrics, 37, 284–290.5948129
2.
DennisW.RaskinE. (1960). Further evidence concerning the effect of handwriting habits upon the location of drawings. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 548–549.13721901
3.
GravesR.BradleyR. (1987). Millisecond interval timer and auditory reaction time programs for the IBM-PC. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 19, 30–35.
4.
GravesR.BradleyR. (1988). More on millisecond timing and tachistoscopic applications for the IBM-PC. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 20, 408–412.
5.
HarselY.WalesR. (1987). Directional preference in problem solving. International Journal of Psychology, 22, 195–206.
6.
KleinR.M. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 138–147.1074027810.1016/S1364-6613(00)01452-2
7.
KremenitzerJ.P.VaughanH.G.KurtzbergD.DowlingK. (1979). Smooth-pursuit eye movements in the newborn infant. Child Development, 50, 442–448.487885
8.
MaassA.RussoA. (2003). Directional bias in the mental representation of spatial events: Nature or culture?Psychological Science, 14, 296–301.1280740010.1111/1467-9280.14421
9.
PollatsekA.BolozkyS.WellA.D.RaynerK. (1981). Asymmetries in the perceptual span for Israeli readers. Brain and Language, 14, 174–180.727272210.1016/0093-934X(81)90073-0
10.
PosnerM.I.CohenY. (1984). Components of visual orienting. InBoumaH.BouwhuisD.G.(Eds.), Attention and performance X (pp.531–556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11.
PosnerM.I.RafalR.D.ChoateL.VaughanJ. (1985). Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 211–228.
12.
PrattJ.SpalekT.M.BradshawF. (1999). The time to detect targets at inhibited and noninhibited locations: Preliminary evidence for attentional momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 730–746.10.1037//0096-1523.25.3.730
13.
RafalR.D.CalabresiP.A.BrennanC.W.ScioltoT.K. (1989). Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 673–685.2531204
14.
Reuter-LorenzP.A.JhaA.P.RosenquistJ.N. (1996). What is inhibited in inhibition of return?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 367–378.893485010.1037//0096-1523.22.2.367
15.
SpalekT.M.HammadS. (2004). Supporting the attentional momentum view of inhibition of return: Is attention biased to go right?Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 219–233.15129744
16.
VaidJ.SinghM. (1989). Asymmetries in the perception of facial affect: Is there an influence of reading habits?Neuropsychologia, 27, 1277–1287.259417410.1016/0028-3932(89)90040-7
