This study examined newborns' face preference using images of natural and scrambled faces in which the location of the inner features was distorted. The results demonstrate that newborns' face preference is not confined to schematic configurations, but can be obtained also with veridical faces. Moreover, this phenomenon is not produced by a specific bias toward the face geometry, but derives from a domain-general bias toward configurations with more elements in the upper than in the lower half (i.e., top-heavy patterns). These results suggest that it may be unnecessary to assume the existence of a prewired tendency to orient toward the face geometry, and support the idea that faces do not possess a special status in newborns' visual world.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
de HaanM.PascalisO.JohnsonM.H. (2002). Specialization of neural mechanisms underlying face recognition in human infants. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2, 199–209.
2.
de SchonenS. (2002). Epigenesis of the cognitive brain: A task for the 21st century. InBackmanL.von HofstenC.(Eds.), Psychology at the turn of the millennium (Vol. 1, pp.55–88). Hove, England: Psychology Press.
3.
EasterbrookM.A.KisilevskyB.S.HainsS.M.J.MuirD.W. (1999). Faceness or complexity: Evidence from newborn visual tracking of facelike stimuli. Infant Behavior and Development, 22, 17–35.
4.
ElmanJ.L.BatesE.A.JohnsonM.H.Karmiloff-SmithA.ParisiD.PlunkettK. (1998). Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
GauthierI.NelsonC.A. (2001). The development of face expertise. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11, 219–224.
6.
JohnsonM.H.de HaanM. (2001). Developing cortical specialization for visual-cognitive function: The case of face recognition. InMcClellandJ.L.SieglerR.S.(Eds.), Mechanisms of cognitive development: Behavioral and neural perspectives (pp.253–270). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7.
JohnsonM.H.MortonJ. (1991). Biology and cognitive development: The case of face recognition. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
8.
KanwisherN. (2000). Domain specificity in face perception. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 759–763.
9.
Karmiloff-SmithA. (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
Macchi CassiaV.SimionF.MilaniI.UmiltàC. (2002). Dominance of global visual properties at birth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 398–411.
11.
MondlochC.J.LewisT.L.BudreauD.R.MaurerD.DannemillerJ.L.StephensB.R.Kleiner-GathercoalK.A. (1999). Face perception during early infancy. Psychological Science, 10, 419–422.
12.
NelsonC.A. (2001). The development and neural bases of face recognition. Infant and Child Development, 10, 3–18.
13.
PascalisO.de HaanM.NelsonC.A. (2002). Is face processing species specific during the first year of life?Science, 296, 1321–1323.
14.
SimionF.Macchi CassiaV.TuratiC.ValenzaE. (2001). The origins of face perception: Specific vs non-specific mechanisms. Infant and Child Development, 10, 59–65.
SkrandiesW. (1987). The upper and lower visual field of man: Electrophysiological and functional differences. InAutrumH.(Ed.), Progress in sensory physiology (Vol. 8, pp.1–93). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
17.
SlaterA.EarleD.C.MorisonV.RoseD. (1985). Pattern preferences at birth and their interaction with habituation-induced novelty preferences. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 39, 37–54.
18.
TarrM.J.GauthierI. (2000). FFA: A flexible fusiform area for subordinate level visual processing automatized by expertise. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 764–769.
19.
TuratiC.SimionF.MilaniI.UmiltàC. (2002). Newborns' preference for faces: What is crucial?Developmental Psychology, 6, 875–882.
20.
Tzourio-MazoyerN.de SchonenS.CrivelloF.ReutterB.AujardY.MazoyerB. (2002). Neural correlates of woman face processing by 2-month-old infants. NeuroImage, 15, 454–461.
21.
ValenzaE.SimionF.Macchi CassiaV.UmiltàC. (1996). Face preference at birth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 892–903.
