Considerable evidence indicates that people overattribute causality to a given stimulus when it is salient or the focus of their attention—the so-called illusory-causation phenomenon. Although illusory causation has proved to be quite robust and generalizable, a compelling explanation for it has not been empirically documented. Four social-attribution studies were conducted to test the hypothesis that illusory causation occurs because salient information is initially registered, or perceptually organized, differently than nonsalient information. The results provide considerable support for the notion that people's literal point of view affects how they initially perceive, or extract, information from an observed interaction, which in turn affects their judgments regarding the causal influence exerted by each interactant.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BriggsM.A.LassiterG.D. (1994). More evidence for the robustness of salience effects. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 9, 171–180.
2.
CohenC.E.EbbesenE.B. (1979). Observational goals and schema activation: A theoretical framework for behavior perception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 305–329.
3.
DeauxK.MajorB. (1977). Sex-related patterns in the unit of perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3, 297–300.
4.
FiskeS.T.KennyD.A.TaylorS.E. (1982). Structural models for the mediation of salience effects on attribution. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 105–127.
5.
GeersA.L.LassiterG.D. (1999). Affective expectations and information gain: Evidence for assimilation and contrast effects in affective experience. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 394–413.
6.
GilbertD.T. (1989). Thinking lightly about others: Automatic components of the social inference process. In UlemanJ.S.BarghJ.A., (Eds.), Unintended thought: Limits of awareness, intention, and control (pp. 189–211). New York: Guilford.
7.
GilbertD.T. (1995). Attribution and interpersonal perception. In TesserA., (Ed.), Advanced social psychology (pp. 99–147). New York: McGraw-Hill.
8.
HastieR.ParkB. (1986). The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the task is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review, 93, 258–268.
9.
KassinS.M. (1997). The psychology of confession evidence. American Psychologist, 52, 221–233.
10.
KassinS.M.BaronR.M. (1985). Basic determinants of attribution and social perception. In HarveyJ.WearyG., (Eds.), Attribution: Basic issues and applications (pp. 37–64). New York: Academic Press.
11.
KelleyH.H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In LevineD., (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 15, pp. 192–238). Lincoln: Nebraska University Press.
12.
KennyD.A.KashyD.A.BolgerN. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In GilbertD.T.FiskeS.T.LindzeyG., (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 233–265). New York: McGraw-Hill.
13.
KoffkaK. (1935). Principles of gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt Brace.
14.
LassiterG.D. (1988). Behavior perception, affect, and memory. Social Cognition, 6, 150–176.
15.
LassiterG.D.BriggsM.A.BowmanR.E. (1991). Need for cognition and the perception of ongoing behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 156–160.
16.
LassiterG.D.GeersA.L.AppleK.J. (2002). Communication set and the perception of ongoing behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 158–171.
17.
LassiterG.D.GeersA.L.AppleK.J.BeersM.J. (2000). Observational goals and behavior unitization: A reexamination. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 649–659.
18.
LassiterG.D.GeersA.L.FlanneryB.C.Ploutz-SnyderR.J. (2001). Attributional consequences of variation in behavior perception: It's what you unitize and how you unitize it. Unpublished manuscript, Ohio University, Athens.
19.
LassiterG.D.GeersA.L.MunhallP.J.HandleyI.M.BeersM.J. (2001). Videotaped confessions: Is guilt in the eye of the camera? In ZannaM.P., (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 189–254). New York: Academic Press.
20.
LassiterG.D.KoenigL.J.AppleK.J. (1996). Mood and behavior perception: Dysphoria can increase and decrease effortful processing of information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 794–810.
21.
LassiterG.D.SlawR.D. (1991). The unitization and memory of events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 80–82.
22.
LassiterG.D.StoneJ.I. (1984). Affective consequences of variation in behavior perception: When liking is in the level of analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 253–259.
23.
LassiterG.D.StoneJ.I.RogersS.L. (1988). Memorial consequences of variation in behavior perception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 222–239.
24.
MarkusH.SmithJ.MorelandR.L. (1985). Role of the self-concept in the perception of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1494–1512.
25.
McArthurL.Z. (1980). Illusory causation and illusory correlation: Two epistemological accounts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 507–519.
26.
McArthurL.Z. (1981). What grabs you? The role of attention in impression formation and causal attribution. In HigginsE.T.HermanC.P.ZannaM.P., (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 1, pp. 201–241). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27.
NewtsonD. (1973). Attribution and the unit of perception of ongoing behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 28–38.
28.
NewtsonD. (1976). Foundations of attribution: The perception of ongoing behavior. In HarveyJ.H.IckesW.J.KiddR.F., (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 1, pp. 223–247). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29.
NewtsonD.EngquistG. (1976). The perceptual organization of ongoing behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 436–450.
30.
NewtsonD.EngquistG.BoisJ. (1976). The reliability of a measure of behavior perception [Abstract] (Ms. No. 1173). JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 6, 5–6.
31.
NewtsonD.RindnerR.J. (1979). Variation in behavior perception and ability attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1847–1858.
32.
NewtsonD.RindnerR.J.MillerR.LaCrossK. (1978). Effects of availability of feature changes on behavior segmentation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 379–388.
33.
PryorJ.B.KrissN. (1977). The cognitive dynamics of salience in the attribution process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 49–55.
34.
SmithE.R.MillerF.D. (1979). Salience and the cognitive mediation of attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2240–2252.
35.
TaylorS.E.CrockerJ.FiskeS.T.SprinzenM.WinklerJ.D. (1979). The generaliz-ability of salience effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 357–368.
36.
TaylorS.E.FiskeS.T. (1975). Point of view and perceptions of causality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 439–445.
37.
TaylorS.E.FiskeS.T. (1978). Salience, attention, and attribution: Top of the head phenomena. In BerkowitzL., (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 249–288). New York: Academic Press.
38.
UlemanJ.S. (1987). Consciousness and control: The case of spontaneous trait inferences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 337–354.
39.
WilderD. (1978). Effects of predictability on units of perception and attribution. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 281–284.
40.
ZebrowitzL.A. (1990). Social perception. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
