12. Subject to the Law: Civil Disobedience,Research Ethics,and the Law of Privilege 1

Iutcovich J. Hoppe S. Kennedy J. Levine F. J. 1999. “Confidentiality and the ASA Code of Ethics: A Response from COPE.” Footnotes (February) 27:5.

Levine F. Kennedy J. M. 1999. “Promoting a Scholar's Privilege: Accelerating the Pace.” Law and Social Inquiry 24:967–76.

Lindgren J. 2002. “Anticipating Problems: Doing Social Science Research in the Shadow of the Law.” Sociological Methodology 32:29–32.

Lowman J. Palys T. S. 1999. “Confidentiality and the 1997 ASA Code of Ethics: A Query.” Footnotes (February) 27:5.

Lowman J. Palys T. S. 2000. “Ethics and Institutional Conflict of Interest: The Research Confidentiality Controversy at Simon Fraser University.” Sociological Practice: A Journal of Clinical and Applied Sociology 2(4):245–55.

Lowman J. Palys T. S. 2001. “The Ethics and Law of Confidentiality in Criminal Justice Research: A Comparison of Canada and the United States.” International Criminal Justice Review 11(1): 1–33.

McLaughlin R. H. 1999. “From the Field to the Courthouse: Should Social Science Research be Privileged?” Law and Social Inquiry 24:927–66.

Palys T. S. Lowman J. 2002. “Anticipating Law: Research Methods, Ethics and the Law of Privilege.” Sociological Methodology 32:1–17.

Popkin S. 2001. “Interview with Samuel Popkin.” In Schultz B. Schultz R. (Eds.), The Price of Dissent: Testimonies to Political Repression in America. Berkeley: University of California Press, 339–47.

Stone G. R. 2002. “Above the Law: Research Methods, Ethics and the Law of Privilege.” Sociological Methodology 32:19–27.

Traynor M. 1996. “Countering the Excessive Subpoena for Scholarly Research.” Law and Contemporary Problems 59:119–48.

Atlantic Sugar, Ltd v. United States (1980). 85 Cust. Ct. 128.

M.(A.) v. Ryan (1997). 1 S.C.R. 157.

United States of America v. John Doe. Appeal of Samuel L. Popkin (1972). 460 F.2d 328 (1^st Cir.).