While immigrants may value their ethnic identities, the symbolic boundaries in many European nations are drawn in an exclusive manner, presenting ethnic identification as incompatible with host national belonging. Combining boundary drawing and contact theory, this article examines whether — in a context of exclusive boundary drawing — contact can lead to more inclusive boundary perceptions and foster identity compatibility. The analysis employs survey and interview data from Denmark, which is taken as a case of exclusive boundary drawing. Demonstrating both positive effects and the limits of contact in such a context, the article offers a critical assessment of contact's potential and contributes to nuancing our understanding of macro and micro conditions of immigrant identity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbaRichard2005 “Bright vs. Blurred Boundaries: Second‐Generation Assimilation and Exclusion in France, Germany, and the United States.” Ethnic and Racial Studies28(1):20–49.
2.
AllportGordon W.1954The Nature of Prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
3.
BarthFredrik1969Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
4.
BerryJohn W.1997 “Immigration, Acculturation, and Adaptation.” Applied Psychology46(1):5–34.
5.
BertossiChristopheBowenJohn R.DuyvendakJan WillemKrookMona Lena2013European States and Their Muslim Citizens. The Impact of Institutions on Perceptions and Boundaries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BranscombeNyla R.SchmittMichael T.HarveyRichard D.1999 “Perceiving Pervasive Discrimination Among African‐Americans: Implications for Group Identification and Well‐Being.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology77(1):135–49.
7.
ChávezLeoDeSipioLouisSchneiderJensWatersMary2012 “Belonging.” In The Changing Face of World Cities, edited by CrulM.MollenkopfJ., 206–32. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
8.
CheekJonathan M.1989 “Identity Orientations and Self‐Interpretation.” In Personality Psychology: Recent Trends and Emerging Directions, edited by BussDavid M.CantorNancy, 275–85. New York, NY: Springer US.
9.
DixonJeffrey C.RosenbaumMichael S.2004 “Nice to Know You? Testing Contact, Cultural, and Group Threat Theories of Anti‐Black and Anti‐Hispanic Stereotypes.” Social Science Quarterly85(2):257–80.
10.
DovidioJohn F.GaertnerSamuel L.KawakamiKerry2003 “Intergroup Contact: The Past, Present, and the Future.” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations6(1):5–21.
11.
DovidioJohn F.GaertnerSamuel L.SaguyTamar2007 “Another View of “We”: Majority and Minority Group Perspectives on a Common Ingroup Identity.” European Review of Social Psychology18(1):296–330.
12.
ErsanilliEvelynKoopmansRuud2011 “Do Immigrant Integration Policies Matter? A Three‐Country Comparison Among Turkish Immigrants.” West European Politics34(2):208–34.
13.
FonerNancySimonPatrick2015 “Introduction: Fear, Anxiety, and National Identity: Immigration and Belonging in North America and Western Europe.” In Fear, Anxiety, and National Identity, edited by FonerN.SimonP., 1–31. New York, NY: The Russell Sage Foundation.
14.
GarnerSteveSelodSaher2015 “The Racialization of Muslims: Empirical Studies of Islamophobia.” Critical Sociology41(1):9–19.
15.
GlasfordDemis E.DovidioJohn F.2011 “E Pluribus Unum: Dual Identity and Minority Group Members' Motivation to Engage in Contact, as Well as Social Change.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology47:1021–24.
16.
GonzálezRobertoBrownRupert2006 “Dual Identities in Intergroup Contact: Group Status and Size Moderate the Generalization of Positive Attitude Change.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology42:753–67.
17.
GundelachPeterNørregård‐NielsenEsther2007Etniske Gruppers Værdier — Baggrundsrapport. Copenhagen: Tænketanken om udfordringer for integrationsindsatsen i Danmark.
18.
HayesBernadette C.McAllisterIanDowdsLizanne2007 “Integrated Education, Intergroup Relations, and Political Identities in Northern Ireland.” Social Problems54(4):454–82.
19.
HewstoneMilesBrownRupert1986 “Contact Is Not Enough: An Intergroup Perspective on the ‘Contact Hypothesis'.” In Contact and Conflict in Intergroup Encounters, edited by HewstoneM.BrownR., 1–44. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
20.
HopkinsNick2011 “Dual Identities and Their Recognition: Minority Group Members' Perspectives.” Political Psychology32(2):251–70.
21.
HopkinsNickGreenwoodRonni Michelle2013 “Hijab, Visibility and the Performance of Identity.” European Journal of Social Psychology43:438–47.
22.
Jasinskaja‐LahtiIngaLiebkindKarmelaSolheimErling2009 “To Identify or Not to Identify? National Disidentification as an Alternative Reaction to Perceived Ethnic Discrimination.” Applied Psychology58(1):105–28.
23.
JensenKristianHelboe NielsenJohanneBrænderMortenMouritsenPerVincents OlsenTore2010 “Tolerance and Cultural Diversity Discourses in Denmark.” Accept Pluralism Research Project. Florence: European University Institute.
24.
JoppkeChristian2004 “The Retreat of Multiculturalism in the Liberal State: Theory and Policy.” The British Journal of Sociology55(2):237–57.
25.
KassayeAidaAshurIbtisaamHeelsumAnjavan2016 “The Relationship Between Media Discourses and Experiences of Belonging: Dutch Somali Perspectives.” Ethnicities16(6):773–97.
26.
KenworthyJared B.TurnerRhiannon M.HewstoneMilesVociAlberto2005 “Intergroup Contact: When Does It Work, and Why?” In On the Nature of Prejudice: Fifty Years After Allport, edited by DovidioJ. F.GlickP.RudmanL. A., 278–292. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
27.
LamontMichéle1992Money, Morals, and Manners: The Culture of the French and American Upper‐Middle Class. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
28.
LamontMichèleMolnárVirág2002 “The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences.” Annual Review of Sociology28:167–95.
29.
McLarenLauren M.2003 “Anti‐Immigrant Prejudice in Europe: Contact, Threat Perception, and Preferences for the Exclusion of Migrants.” Social Forces81(3):909–36.
30.
ModoodTariq2005Multicultural Politics: Racism, Ethnicity, and Muslims in Britain. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
31.
MouritsenPerOlsenTore Vincents2013 “Denmark Between Liberalism and Nationalism.” Ethnic and Racial Studies36(4):691–710.
32.
PettigrewThomas F.1998 “Intergroup Contact Theory.” Annual Review of Psychology49:65–85.
33.
PettigrewThomas F.TroppLinda R.2006 “A Meta‐Analytic Test of Intergroup Contact Theory.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology90(5):751–83.
34.
PettigrewThomas F.TroppLinda R.2008 “How Does Intergroup Contact Reduce Prejudice? Meta‐Analytic Tests of Three Mediators.” European Journal of Social Psychology38:922–34.
35.
PhinneyJean S.BerryJohn W.VedderPaulLiebkindKarmela2006 “The Acculturation Experience: Attitudes, Identities, and Behaviors of Immigrant Youth.” In Immigrant Youth in Cultural Transition: Acculturation, Identity, and Adaptation Across National Contexts, edited by BerryJ. W.PhinneyJ. S.SamD. L.VedderP., 71–116. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
36.
ReichelDavidMoralesLaura2017 “Surveying Immigrants Without Sampling Frames — Evaluating the Success of Alternative Field Methods.” Comparative Migration Studies5(1):1–22.
37.
SchneiderJensFokkemaTinekeMatiasRaquelStojcicSnezanaUgrinaDusanVera‐LarruceaConstanza2012 “Identities: Urban Belonging and Intercultural Relations.” In The European Second Generation Compared, edited by CrulM.SchneiderJ.LelieF., 285–340. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
38.
SimonPatrick2012French National Identity and Integration: Who Belongs to the National Community?Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.
39.
SimonsenKristina Bakkær2016 “Ghetto‐Society‐Problem. A Discourse Analysis of Nationalist Othering.” Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism16(1):83–99.
40.
SlootmanMariekeDuyvendakJan Willem2015 “Feeling Dutch: The Culturalization and Emotionalization of Citizenship and Second‐Generation Belonging in the Netherlands.” In Fear, Anxiety, and National Identity, edited by FonerN.SimonP., 147–168. New York, NY: The Russell Sage Foundation.
41.
SnidermanPaul M.PetersenMichael BangSlothuusRuneStubagerRune2014Paradoxes of Liberal Democracy: Islam, Western Europe and the Danish Cartoon Crisis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
42.
Statistics Denmark2015Indvandrere i Danmark 2015. Copenhagen: Statistics Denmark.
43.
TonkensEvelienDuyvendakJan Willem2016 “Introduction: The Culturalization of Citizenship.” In The Culturalization of Citizenship. Belonging and Polarization in a Globalizing World, edited by DuyvendakJ. W.GeschiereP.TonkensE., 1–20. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
44.
TroppLinda R.PettigrewThomas F.2005a “Differential Relationships Between Intergroup Contact and Affective and Cognitive Dimensions of Prejudice.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin31(8):1145–58.
45.
TroppLinda R.PettigrewThomas F.2005b “Relationships Between Intergroup Contact and Prejudice Among Minority and Majority Status Groups.” Psychological Science16(12):951–57.
46.
ValentineGill2013 “Living With Difference: Proximity and Encounter in Urban Life.” Geography98(1):4–9.
47.
VerkuytenMaykelMartinovicBorja2012 “Immigrants' National Identification: Meanings, Determinants, and Consequences.” Social Issues and Policy Review6(1):82–112.
48.
WimmerAndreas2013Ethnic Boundary Making: Institutions, Power, Networks. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
49.
Survey data: ‘Etniske gruppers værdier, 2006', DDA‐21171, retrieved from Danmarks Rigsarkiv
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
