In industrialized countries, wages between migrants and natives usually differ. Previous studies that mostly focused on human capital theory and cross-sectional wage differences failed to fully explain the wage gap. We offer a new explanation and assume that differences in the employment trajectories of migrants and natives contribute to diverging wages after labor market entrance. Utilizing longitudinal data for Germany, we analyze the job mobility of migrants and natives and distinguish among voluntary, involuntary, and internal job changes. Indeed, we find evidence for differences in transition patterns and — using several fixed-effects regressions — are able to explain a substantial part of the gap in hourly wages. The results suggest that the higher number of involuntary changes among migrants increases the wage gap. In contrast, support for more voluntary and internal job changes among migrants should help to counteract diverging earnings trajectories.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgrawalT.2013 “Gender and Caste-Based Wage Discrimination in India: Some Recent Evidence.” Journal for Labour Market Research47:329–40.
2.
AldashevA.GernandtJ.ThomsenS. L.2012The Immigrant-Native Wage Gap in Germany. Vol. 232, Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie u Statistik. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.
3.
AlganY.DustmannC.GlitzA.ManningA.2010 “The Economic Situation of First and Second-Generation Immigrants in France, Germany and the United Kingdom.” The Economic Journal120:1–30.
4.
AntoniM.JacobebbinghausP.SethS.2011ALWA-Befragungsdaten Verknüpft mit Administrativen Daten des IAB (ALWA-ADIAB) 1975–2009. FDZ-Datenreport 05/2011, Nürnberg, 11 S.
5.
AntoniM.SethS.2012 “ALWA-ADIAB – Linked Individual Survey and Administrative Data for Substantive and Methodological Research.” Schmollers Jahrbuch. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts-und Sozialwissenschaften132:141–46.
6.
AntoniM.DraschK.KleinertC.MatthesB.RulandM.TrahmsA.2010Working and Learning in a Changing World. FDZ-Methodenbericht 05/2010, Nürnberg, 49 S.
7.
ArrowK.1973 “The Theory of Discrimination.” In Discrimination in Labor Markets, edited by AshenfelterO.ReesA., 3–33. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8.
BarthE.BratsbergB.RaaumO.2012 “Immigrant Wage Profiles Within and Between Establishments.” Labour Economics19:541–56.
9.
BasilioL.BauerT. K.KramerA.2014Transferability of Human Capital and Immigrant Assimilation: An Analysis for Germany. SOEP Paper No. 671. Berlin: DIW.
10.
BeckerG. S.1957The Economics of Discrimination. Chicago, UK: University of Chicago Press.
11.
BertoliS.BrückerH.MoragaJ. F.-H.2013The European Crisis and Migration to Germany: Expectations and the Diversion of Migration Flows. IZA Discussion Paper 7170. Bonn: IZA.
12.
BorjasG. J.1985 “Assimilation, Changes in Cohort Quality, and the Earnings of Immigrants.” Journal of Labor Economics3:463–89.
13.
BorjasG. J.1994 “The Economics of Immigration.” Journal of Economic Literature32:1677–717.
14.
BrückerH.2015 “Migration und Finanzkrise: Eine Quantitative und Strukturelle Analyse der Umlenkung von Wanderungsströmen.” Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 67:165–91.
15.
BurdettK.1978 “A Theory of Employee Job Search and Quit Rates.” The American Economic Review68:212–20.
16.
CameronA. C.TrivediP. K.2010Microeconometrics Using Stata, 2nd ed. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
17.
ChiswickB. R.1978 “The Effect of Americanization on the Earnings of Foreign-Born Men.” Journal of Political Economy86:897–921.
18.
ChiswickB. R.MillerP. W.2009 “The International Transferability of Immigrants’ Human Capital.” Economics of Education Review28:162–69.
19.
Cobb-ClarkD. A.2001Getting Ahead: The Determinants of and Payoffs to Internal Promotion for Young U.S. Men and Women. IZA Discussion Paper No. 288. Bonn: IZA.
20.
CornellB.WelchI.1996 “Culture, Information, and Screening Discrimination.” The Journal of Political Economy104:542–71.
21.
DraschK.MatthesB.2013 “Improving Retrospective Life Course Data by Combining Modularized Self-Reports and Event History Calendars. Quality and Quantity.” International Journal of Methodology47:817–38.
22.
DustmannC.1993 “Earnings Adjustment of Temporary Migrants.” Journal of Population Economics6:153–68.
23.
DustmannC.PereiraS. C.2008 “Wage Growth and Job Mobility in the United Kingdom and Germany.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review61:374–93.
24.
FriedbergR. M.2000 “You Can’t Take It With You? Immigrant Assimilation and the Portability of Human Capital.” Journal of Labor Economics18:221–51.
25.
FullerS.2008 “Job Mobility and Wage Trajectories for Men and Women in the United States.” American Sociological Review73:158–83.
26.
FullerS.2014 “Do Pathways Matter? Linking Early Immigrant Employment Sequences and Later Economic Outcomes: Evidence From Canada.” International Migration Review49:355–405.
27.
FullerS.MartinT. F.2012 “Predicting Immigrant Employment Sequences in the First Years of Settlement.” International Migration Review46:138–90.
28.
García PérezJ. I.Rebollo SanzY.2005 “Wage Changes Through Job Mobility in Europe: A Multinomial Endogenous Switching Approach.” Labour Economics12:531–55.
29.
GibbonsR.KatzL. F.1991 “Layoffs and Lemons.” Journal of Labor Economics9:351–80.
30.
GiusM.2014 “The Impact of Job Mobility on Earnings: Using Occupational and Industrial Classifications to Identify Job Changes.” International Review of Applied Economics28:181–90.
31.
GranatoN.KalterF.2001 “Die Persistenz Ethnischer Ungleichheit auf dem Deutschen Arbeitsmarkt: Diskriminierung Oder Unterinvestition in Humankapital?” Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie53:497–520.
32.
JovanovicB.1979a “Firm-Specific Capital and Turnover.” Journal of Political Economy87:1246–60.
33.
JovanovicB.1979b “Job Matching and the Theory of Turnover.” Journal of Political Economy87:972–90.
34.
KeithK.McWilliamsA.1999 “The Returns to Mobility and Job Search by Gender.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review52:460–77.
35.
KleinertC.MatthesB.AntoniM.DraschK.RulandM.TrahmsA.2011 “ALWA – New Life Course Data for Germany.” Schmollers Jahrbuch. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts-und Sozialwissenschaften131:625–34.
36.
LehmerF.LudsteckJ.2011 “The Immigrant Wage Gap in Germany: Are East Europeans Worse Off?” International Migration Review45:872–906.
37.
LehmerF.LudsteckJ.2014 “Wage Assimilation of Foreigners: Which Factors Close the Gap? Evidence From Germany.” Review of Income and Wealth61:677–701.
38.
MortensenD. T.1988 “Wages, Separations, and Job Tenure: On-the-Job Specific Training or Matching?” Journal of Labor Economics6:445–71.
39.
NielsenH. S.RosholmM.SmithN.HustedL.2004 “Qualifications, Discrimination, or Assimilation? An Extended Framework for Analysing Immigrant Wage Gaps.” Empirical Economics29:855–83.
PhelpsE. S.1972 “The Statistical Theory of Racism and Sexism.” The American Economic Review62:659–61.
42.
ReicheltM.2015Using Longitudinal Wage Information in Linked Data Sets. FDZ-Methodenbericht 01/2015, Nürnberg, 14 S.
43.
SchmelzerP.2012 “The Consequences of Job Mobility for Future Earnings in Early Working Life in Germany-Placing Indirect and Direct Job Mobility Into Institutional Context.” European Sociological Review28:82–95.
44.
SeifertW.1997 “Occupational and Economic Mobility and Social Integration of Mediterranean Migrants in Germany.” European Journal of Population13:1–16.
45.
TopelR. H.WardM. P.1992 “Job Mobility and the Careers of Young Men.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics107:439–79.
46.
VellingJ.1995Wage Discrimination and Occupational Segregation of Foreign Male Workers in Germany. ZEW Discussion Paper 95-04. Mannheim: Universität Mannheim, ZEW.
47.
WegenerB.1991 “Job Mobility and Social Ties: Social Resources, Prior Job, and Status Attainment.” American Sociological Review56:60–71.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
