Foundational theories of international migration rest on the assumption that immigrants maintain reference groups in their country of origin even after settling in a new place, while the transnationalism perspective suggests that immigrants maintain a dual frame of reference. This article uses the nationally representative National Latino and Asian American Survey to test the location of immigrants’ reference groups. I find that the relationship between various measures of subjective social standing and subjective well-being suggests that immigrants maintain simultaneous reference groups in both the United States and the country of origin, supporting transnational theories, and refuting earlier theories.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdlerN. E.EpelE. S.CastellazzoG., and IckovicsJ. R.2000“Relationship of Subjective and Objective Social Status with Psychological and Physiological Functioning: Preliminary Data in Healthy White Women.”Health Psychology19: 586–592.
2.
AlegriaM.JacksonJ. S.KesslerR. C., and TakeuchiD.2004Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiology Surveys (CPES), 2001–2003, User Guide.Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
3.
BallR., and ChernovaK.2008“Absolute Income, Relative Income, and Happiness.”Social Indicators Research88: 497–529.
4.
BaschL.Glick SchillerN., and Szanton BlancC.1993Nations Unbound: Transnational Projects, Postcolonial Predicaments and Deterritorialized Nation-States.London: Routledge.
5.
ClarkA. E.FrijtersP., and ShieldsM. A.2008“Relative Income, Happiness, and Utility: An Explanation for the Easterlin Paradox and Other Puzzles.”Journal of Economic Literature46: 95–144.
6.
ClarkA. E.FrijtersP.ShieldsM. A., and OswaldA. J.1996“Satisfaction and Comparison Income.”Journal of Public Economics61: 359–381.
7.
CutlerD.DeatonA., and Lleras-MuneyA.2006“The Determinants of Mortality.”Journal of Economic Perspectives20: 97–120.
8.
DienerE.SuhE. M.LucasR. E., and SmithH. L.1999“Subjective Weil-Being: Three Decades of Progress.”Psychological Bulletin125: 276–302.
9.
EasterlinR. A.1974“Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence.” In Nations and Households in Economic Growth. Ed. DavidP. A., and RederM. W.New York: Academic Press, Pp. 89–125.
10.
FanC. S., and StarkO.2007“A Social Proximity Explanation of the Reluctance to Assimilate.”Kyklos60: 55–63.
11.
Ferrer-i-CarbonellA.2005“Income and Weil-Being: An Empirical Analysis of the Comparison Income Effect.”Journal of Public Economics89: 997–1019.
12.
FranziniL., and Fernandez-EsquerM.2006“The Association of Subjective Social Status and Health in Low-Income Mexican-Origin Individuals in Texas.”Social Sciences & Medicine63: 788–804.
13.
FreyB. S., and StutzerA.2002Happiness and Economics: How the Economy and Institutions Affect Well-Being.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
GrasmuckS., and PessarP. R.1991Between Two Islands: Dominican International Migration.Berkeley: University of California Press.
15.
GuarnizoL. E.1997“The Emergence of a Transnational Social Formation and the Mirage of Return Migration Among Dominican Transmigrants.”Identities4(2): 281.
16.
HughesM., and ThomasM. E.1998“The Continuing Significance of Race Revisited: A Study of Race, Class, and Quality of Life in America, 1972 to 1996.”American Sociological Review63: 785–795.
17.
KelleyJ., and EvansM. D. R.1995“Class and Class Conflict in Six Western Nations.”American Sociological Review60: 157–178.
18.
LeeT. L., and FiskeS. T.2006“Not an Out-Group, Not Yet an In-Group: Immigrants in the Stereotype Content Model.”International Journal of Intercultural Relations30: 751–768.
19.
LeuJ.2008“The Association between Subjective Social Status and Mental Health Among Asian Immigrants: Investigating the Influence of Age at Immigration.”Social Sciences & Medicine66: 1152–1164.
20.
LuttmerE. F. P.2005“Neighbors as Negatives: Relative Earnings and Weil-Being.”The Quarterly Journal of Economics120: 963–1002.
21.
MasseyD. S.1999Worlds in Motion: Understanding International Migration at the End of the Millennium.New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
PioreM. J.1979Birds of Passage: Migrant Labor and Industrial Society.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
RoggE.1971“The Influence of a Strong Refugee Community on the Economic Adjustment of Its Members.”International Migration Review5: 474–481.
24.
SeemanT.1997“Price of Adaptation–Allostatic Load and Its Health Consequences.”Archives of Internal Medicine157: 2259–2268.
25.
SeguraD. A.1989“Chicana and Mexican Immigrant Women at Work: The Impact of Class, Race, and Gender on Occupational Mobility.”Gender and Society3: 37–52.
26.
StarkO.1991The Migration of Labor.Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
27.
StewartQ. T.2006“Reinvigorating Relative Deprivation: A New Measure for a Classic Concept.”Social Science Research35: 779–802.
28.
StichnothH.2010The Optimal Choice of a Reference Standard for Income Comparisons: Indirect Evidence from Immigrants’ Return Visits.Working Paper. Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.
29.
VertovecS.2006“Migrant Transnationalism and Modes of Transformation.”International Migration Review38(3): 970–1001.
30.
WallersteinI.2011The Modern World-System I: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century, With a New Prologue, 1st edn. Berkeley: University of California Press.
31.
ZhouM.1995“Low-Wage Employment and Social Mobility: The Experience of Immigrant Chinese Women in New York City.”National Journal of Sociology9: 1–30.
