The Cochrane Stroke Group was one of the first specialist review groups set up within The Cochrane Collaboration and has been in existence for 20 years. Its key outputs include a number of high profile reviews in the area of the management of stroke, which have become one of the most important sources of information for clinical practice guidelines. The work of the group is only possible through a collaborative network of staff, editors, and authors.
DickersinKManheimerE. The Cochrane Collaboration: evaluation of health care and services using systematic reviews of the results of randomized controlled trials. Clin Obstet Gynecol1998; 41:315–31.
3.
CochraneAL. Effectiveness and Efficiency. Random Reflections on Health Services. London, Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust, 1972.
GibsonLMBrazzelliMThomasBMSandercockPA. A systematic review of clinical trials of pharmacological interventions for acute ischaemic stroke (1955–2008) that were completed, but not published in full. Trials2010; 11:43.
6.
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidlines Network. Management of Patients with Stroke or TIA: Assessment, Investigation, Immediate Management and Secondary Prevention. Edinburgh, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidlines Network, 2008.
7.
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidlines Network. Management of Patients with Stroke: Rehabilitation, Prevention, and Management of Complications, and Discharge Planning. London, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidlines Network, 2010.
8.
The Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. National Clinical Guideline for Stroke, 4th edn.London, Royal College of Physicians, 2012.
9.
The European Stroke Organisation (ESO) Executive Committee and the ESO Writing Committee. Guidelines for management of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack 2008. Cerebrovasc Dis2008; 25:457–507.
10.
PrasadKKaulSPadmaMVGorthiSPKhuranaDBakshiA. Stroke management. Ann Indian Acad. Neurol2011; 14(Suppl. 1):S82–96.
11.
National Stroke Foundation. Clinical Guidelines for Stroke Management 2010. Melbourne, National Stroke Foundation, 2010.
12.
PollockASt GeorgeBFentonMFirkinsL. Top 10 research priorities relating to life after stroke – consensus from stroke survivors, caregivers, and health professionals. Int J Stroke2012. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00942.x.
13.
Database of Research in Stroke. Available at http://www.askdoris.org (accessed 27 November 2013).
14.
CounsellCEClarkeMJSlatteryJSandercockPA. The miracle of DICE therapy for acute stroke: fact or fictional product of subgroup analysis?BMJ1994; 309:1677–81.
15.
BereczkiDGesztelyiG. A Hungarian example for handsearching specialized national healthcare journals of small countries for controlled trials. Is it worth the trouble?Health Libr Rev2000; 17:144–7.
16.
BathFJOwenVEBathPM. Quality of full and final publications reporting acute stroke trials: a systematic review. Stroke1998; 29:2203–10.
17.
CampbellMFitzpatrickRHainesA. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ2000; 321:694–6.
18.
JosephsonCBWhitePMKrishanAAl-Shahi SalmanR. Computed tomography angiography or magnetic resonance angiography for detection of intracranial vascular malformations in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage (Protocol). Cochrane Database Syst Rev2011; (10): CD009372. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009372.
