New digital technologies have transformed the nature of uncertainty inherent in entrepreneurial processes and outcomes as well as the ways of dealing with such uncertainty. This has raised important questions at the intersection of digital technologies and entrepreneurship—on digital entrepreneurship. We consider two broad implications—less bounded entrepreneurial processes and outcomes and less predefined locus of entrepreneurial agency—and advance a research agenda that calls for the explicit theorizing of concepts related to digital technologies. In articulating the promise and value of such a digital technology perspective, we consider how it would build on and enrich existing entrepreneurship theories.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AldrichH. (2014). The democratization of entrepreneurship? Hackers, makerspaces, and crowdfunding. Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Philadelphia, August 2014.
2.
AldrichH.E. & KimP.H. (2007). Small worlds, infinite possibilities? How social networks affect entrepreneurial team formation and search. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1–2), 147–165.
3.
AlvarezS.A., BarneyJ.B., & AndersonP. (2013). Forming and exploiting opportunities: The implications of discovery and creation processes for entrepreneurial and organizational research. Organization Science, 24(1), 301–317.
4.
Arriaga–AzkarateT. & CroasdellD. (2013). NASF in Twitter: An entrepreneur's community of practice using electronic networks of practice. In Proceedings of the 46th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Information Systems, Wailea, HI (pp. 3488–3493). Washington, DC: IEEE Society Computer Society.
5.
BaileyD.E., LeonardiP.M., & BarleyS.R. (2012). The lure of the virtual. Organization Science, 23(5), 1485–1504.
6.
BaronR.A. (2006). Opportunity recognition as pattern recognition: How entrepreneurs “connect the dots” to identify new business opportunities. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(1), 104–119.
BelleflammeP., LambertT., & SchwienbacherA. (2013). Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(5), 585–609.
9.
BinghamC.B. & HaleblianJ. (2012). How firms learn heuristics: Uncovering missing components of organizational learning. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6, 152–177.
10.
BoekerW. & KarichalilR. (2002). Entrepreneurial transitions: Factors influencing founder departure. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 818–826.
11.
BolandR.J.Jr., LyytinenK., & YooY. (2007). Wakes of innovation in project networks: The case of digital 3–D representations in architecture, engineering, and construction. Organization Science, 18(4), 631–647.
12.
BresnahanT. & GreensteinS. (2014). Mobile computing: The next platform rivalry. American Economic Review, 104(5), 475–480.
13.
BrinckmannJ., GrichnikD., & KapsaD. (2010). Should entrepreneurs plan or just storm the castle? A meta–analysis on contextual factors impacting the business planning–performance relationship in small firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 24–40.
14.
BrynjolfssonE. & SaundersA. (2009). Wired for innovation: How information technology is reshaping the economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15.
ChandlerG.N. & HanksS.H. (1994). Founder competence, the environment, and venture performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(3), 77–90.
16.
ChandraY. & CovielloN. (2010). Broadening the concept of international entrepreneurship: ‘Consumers as international entrepreneurs.’ Journal of World Business, 45, 228–236.
17.
DavidsonE. & VaastE. (2010). Digital entrepreneurship and its sociomaterial enactment. In Proceedings of the 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1–10). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
18.
DavidssonP. (2015). Entrepreneurial opportunities and the entrepreneurship nexus: A re–conceptualization. Journal of Business Venturing, 30, 674–695.
19.
DimovD. (in press). Towards a design science of entrepreneurship. In CorbettA. C. & KatzJ. A. (Eds.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth (Vol. 18). Bingley, UK: Emerald Press.
20.
DoughertyD. & DunneD.D. (2012). Digital science and knowledge boundaries in complex innovation. Organization Science, 23(5), 1467–1484.
21.
EkbiaH.R. (2009). Digital artifacts as quasi–objects: Qualification, mediation, and materiality. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(12), 2554–2566.
FauchartE. & GruberM. (2011). Darwinians, communitarians, and missionaries: The role of founder identity in entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Journal, 54(5), 935–957.
24.
FaulknerP. & RundeJ. (2009). On the identity of technological objects and user innovations in function. Academy of Management Review, 34(3), 442–462.
25.
FischerE. & ReuberA.R. (2011). Social interaction via new social media: (How) can interactions on Twitter affect effectual thinking and behavior?Journal of Business Venturing, 26(1), 1–18.
26.
FoerdererJ., KudeT., SchuetzS., & HeinzlA. (2014). Control vs. generativity: A complex adaptive systems perspective on service platforms. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Auckland, NZ.
27.
ForbesD.P., BorchertP.S., Zellmer–BruhnM.E., & SapienzaH.J. (2006). Entrepreneurial team formation: An exploration of new member addition. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(2), 225–248.
28.
GaglioC.M. & KatzJ. (2001). The psychological basis of opportunity identification: Entrepreneurial alertness. Journal of Small Business Economics, 12(2), 95–111.
29.
GaoL.S. & IyerB. (2006). Analyzing complementarities using software stacks for software industry acquisitions. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(2), 119–147.
30.
GartnerW.B. (2007). Entrepreneurial narrative and a science of the imagination. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(5), 613–627.
31.
GarudR., GehmanJ., & GiulianiA.P. (2014). Contextualizing entrepreneurial innovation: A narrative perspective. Research Policy, 43(7), 1177–1188.
32.
GarudR. & GiulianiA. (2013). A narrative perspective on entrepreneurial opportunities. Academy of Management Review, 38(1), 157–160.
33.
GarudR., JainS., & TuertscherP. (2008). Incomplete by design and designing for incompleteness. Organization Studies, 29(3), 351–371.
34.
GarudR. & KarnoeP. (2003). Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 32(2), 277–300.
35.
GaskinJ., BerenteN., LyytinenK., & YooY. (2014). Toward generalizable sociomaterial inquiry: A computational approach for zooming in and out of sociomaterial routines. MIS Quarterly, 38(3), 849–871.
36.
GawerA. & CusumanoM.A. (2002). Platform leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco drive industry innovation. Cambridge, MA: HBS Press.
37.
GentnerD. (1983). Structure–mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155–170.
38.
GibsonJ.J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
39.
GrégoireD.A., BarrP.S., & ShepherdD.A. (2010). Cognitive processes of opportunity recognition: The role of structural alignment. Organization Science, 21(2), 413–431.
40.
GregoireD., CorbettA.C., & McMullenJ.S. (2011). The cognitive perspective in entrepreneurship: An agenda for future research. Journal of Management Studies, 48(6), 1443–1477.
41.
GruberM. (2007). Uncovering the value of planning in new venture creation: A process and contingency perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(6), 782–807.
42.
HarperD.A. (2008). Towards a theory of entrepreneurial teams. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(6), 613–626.
43.
HatchM. (2013). The maker movement manifesto: Rules for innovation in the new world of crafters, hackers, and tinkerers. New York: McGraw–Hill.
44.
HendersonR.M. & ClarkK.B. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 9–30.
45.
HevnerA.R., MarchS.T., ParkJ., & RamS. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105.
46.
HmieleskiK.M. & BaronR.A. (2009). Entrepreneurs’ optimism and new venture performance: A social cognitive perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 473–488.
47.
HonigB. & KarlssonT. (2004). Institutional forces and the written business plan. Journal of Management, 30(1), 29–48.
48.
HuangP., CeccagnoliM., FormanC., & WuD.J. (2013). Participation in a platform ecosystem: Appropriability, competition, and access to the installed base. Management Science, 59(1), 102–121.
49.
HuangJ., HenfridssonO., LiuM., & NewellS. (in press). Growing on steroids: Rapidly scaling the user base through digital innovation. MIS Quarterly.
50.
IansitiM. & LevienR. (2004). The keystone advantage. Boston: HBS Press.
51.
IngramC., TeiglandR., & VaastE. (2014). Solving the puzzle of crowdfunding: Where technology affordances and institutional entrepreneurship collide. In Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 56–67). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
52.
KallinikosJ., AaltonenA., & MartonA. (2013). The ambivalent ontology of digital artifacts. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 357–370.
53.
KaneG.C., JohnsonJ., & MajchrzakA. (2014). Emergent life cycle: The tension between knowledge change and knowledge retention in open online coproduction communities. Management Science, 60(12), 3026–3048.
54.
KelestynB. & HenfridssonO. (2014). Everyday digital entrepreneurship: The inception, shifts, and scaling of future shaping practices. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, Auckland, NZ.
55.
KerrW.R., NandaR., & Rhodes–KropfM. (2014). Entrepreneurship as experimentation. The Journal of Economic Perspectives,28(3), 25–48.
56.
KimK., & HannI. (2013). Does crowdfunding democratize access to capital? A geographical analysis. INFORMS Conference on Information Systems and Technology (CIST), Arlington, Virginia.
57.
KirznerI.M. (1979). Perception, opportunity, and profit: Studies in the theory of entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
58.
KlotzA.C., HmieleskiK.M., BradleyB.H., & BusenitzL.W. (2014). New venture teams a review of the literature and roadmap for future research. Journal of Management, 40(1), 226–255.
59.
KnightF.H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Washington, DC: Beard Books.
60.
LeeJ. & BerenteN. (2012). Digital innovation and the division of innovative labor: Digital controls in the automotive industry. Organization Science, 23(5), 1428–1447.
61.
LeonardiP.M. (2011). When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 147–167.
62.
LuschR.F. & NambisanS. (2015). Service innovation: A service–dominant logic perspective. MIS Quarterly, 39(1), 155–175.
63.
LyytinenK., YooY., & BolandR.J.Jr. (2016). Digital product innovation within four classes of innovation networks. Information Systems Journal, 26(1), 47–75.
64.
MajchrzakA., FarajS., KaneG.C., & AzadB. (2013). The contradictory influence of social media affordances on online communal knowledge sharing. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 19(1), 38–55.
65.
MajchrzakA. & MalhotraA. (2013). Towards an information systems perspective and research agenda on crowdsourcing for innovation. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 22, 257–268.
66.
MajchrzakA. & MarkusM. (2013). Technology affordances and constraints theory (of MIS). In KesslerE. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of management theory (pp. 832–836). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
67.
MarchS.T. & StoreyV.C. (2008). Design science in the information systems discipline: An introduction to the special issue on design science research. MIS Quarterly, 32, 725–730.
68.
McKelvieA., HaynieJ.M., & GustavssonV. (2011). Unpacking the uncertainty construct: Implications for entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(3), 273–292.
69.
McMullenJ.S. & ShepherdD.A. (2006). Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 132–152.
70.
MischelW. (2004). Toward an integrative science of the person. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 1–22.
71.
MollickE. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 1–16.
72.
MortaraL. & ParisotN.G. (in press). How do fab–spaces enable entrepreneurship? Case studies of ‘makers’ entrepreneurs. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology & Management.
73.
MüllerA.P. & BeckerL. (2013). Narrative and innovation: New ideas for business administration, strategic management and entrepreneurship. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS.
74.
NambisanS. & BaronR.A. (2013). Entrepreneurship in innovation ecosystems: Entrepreneurs’ self–regulatory processes and their implications for new venture success. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(5), 1071–1097.
75.
NambisanS. & NambisanP. (2013). Engaging citizens in co–creation in public services: Lessons learned and best practices. Research Report. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.
76.
NambisanS. & SawhneyM.S. (2011). Orchestration processes in network–centric innovation: Evidence from the field. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(3), 40–57.
77.
NambisanS. & ZahraS.A. (2016). The role of demand–side narratives in opportunity formation and enactment. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 5, 70–75.
OrlikowskiW.J. & ScottS.V. (2008). Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 433–474.
80.
ParkerG., Van AlstyneM., & ChoudaryS.P. (2016). Platform revolution: How networked markets are transforming the economy–and how to make them work for you. New York: W.W. Norton Publishing.
81.
PeffersK., TuunanenT., RothenbergerM.A., & ChatterjeeS. (2008). A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 45–77.
82.
PentlandB.T., HaeremT., & HillisonD. (2010). Comparing organizational routines as recurrent patterns of action. Organization Studies, 31(7), 917–940.
83.
PorterM.E. & HeppelmannJ.E. (2014). How smart, connected products are transforming competition. Harvard Business Review, 92(11), 64–88.
RaginC.C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy set and beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
86.
RaynaT., StriukovaL., & DarlingtonJ. (2015). Co–creation and user innovation: The role of online 3D printing platforms. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 37, 90–102.
87.
ReadS., SongM., & SmitW. (2009). A meta–analytic review of effectuation and venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 24, 573–587.
88.
RiesE. (2011). The lean startup: How today's entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. New York: Crown Publishing.
89.
SarasonY., DeanT., & DillardJ.F. (2006). Entrepreneurship as the nexus of individual and opportunity: A structuration view. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(3), 286–305.
90.
SarasvathyS.D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243–263.
91.
SarasvathyS.D. & DewN. (2005). New market creation through transformation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 15(5), 533–565.
92.
SchjoedtL., MonsenE., PearsonA., BarnettT., & ChrismanJ.J. (2013). New venture and family business teams: Understanding team formation, composition, behaviors, and performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(1), 1–15.
93.
SchumpeterJ.A. (1934). The theory of economic development. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
94.
SeldenP.D. & FletcherD.E. (2015). The entrepreneurial journey as an emergent hierarchical system of artifact–creating processes. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(4), 603–615.
95.
ShahS.K. & TripsasM. (2007). The accidental entrepreneur: The emergent and collective process of user entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1, 123–140.
96.
ShaneS. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11, 448–469.
97.
ShaneS. & EckhardtJ. (2003). The individual opportunity nexus. In AcsZ. J. & AudretschD. B. (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship research: An interdisciplinary survey and introduction. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
98.
ShepherdD.A. (2011). Multilevel entrepreneurship research: Opportunities for studying entrepreneurial decision making. Journal of Management, 37(2), 412–420.
99.
ShortJ.C., KetchenD.J.Jr., ShookC.L., & IrelandR.D. (2010). The concept of “opportunity” in entrepreneurship research: Past accomplishments and future challenges. Journal of Management, 36(1), 40–65.
100.
SmithA., SabineH., SaschaD., JohanS., & van OostE. (2013). Grassroots digital fabrication and makerspaces: Reconfiguring, relocating and recalibrating innovation? SPRU Working Paper. University of Sussex, Brighton, Sussex.
101.
SrinivasanA. & VenkatramanN. (2013). Dynamics of platform–based networks during periods of architectural shifts in videogames. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management Proceedings, August.
102.
SvahnF., MathiassenL., & LindgrenR. (in press). Embracing digital innovation in incumbent firms: How Volvo cars managed competing concerns. MIS Quarterly.
103.
TilsonD., LyytinenK., & SørensenC. (2010). Digital infrastructures: The missing IS research agenda. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 748–759.
104.
TiwanaA., KonsynskiB., & BushA.A. (2010). Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 675–687.
UmS., YooY., WattalS., KulathinalR.J., & ZhangB. (2013). The architecture of generativity in a digital ecosystem: A network biology perspective. Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Information Systems, Milan, Italy.
107.
UtterbackJ. (1994). Mastering the dynamics of innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
108.
VenkatramanS., SarasvathyS.D., DewN., & ForsterW.R. (2012). Reflections on the 2010 AMR Decade Award: Whither the promise? Moving forward with entrepreneurship as a science of the artificial. Academy of Management Review, 37, 21–33.
109.
VissaB. & BhagavatulaS. (2012). The causes and consequences of churn in entrepreneurs’ personal networks. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6(3), 273–289.
110.
WoodardC.J., NarayanR., TschangF.T., & SambamurthyV. (2013). Design capital and design moves: The logic of digital business strategy. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 537–564.
111.
WuytsS., ColomboM.G., DuttaS., & NooteboomB. (2005). Empirical test of optimal cognitive distance. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 28, 277–302.
112.
YooY., HenfridssonO., & LyytinenK. (2010). The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 724–735.
113.
ZahraS. & NambisanS. (2011). Entrepreneurship in global innovation ecosystems. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 2011(1), 4–17.
114.
ZhaoH., SeibertS.E., & LumpkinG.T. (2010). The relationship of personality to entrepreneurial intentions and performance: A meta–analytic review. Journal of Management, 36(2), 381–404.
115.
ZittrainJ. (2006). The generative Internet. Harvard Law Review, 119(7), 1975–2040.
116.
ZittrainJ. (2008). The future of the Internet and how to stop it. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
117.
ZupicI. (2014). The knowledge base of technology entrepreneurship. In TherinF. (Ed.), Handbook of research on techno–entrepreneurship (2nd ed.; pp. 1–16). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
