This paper develops and tests a model of an individual's intention to reenter entrepreneurship following business exit. Two long–standing theories, prospect theory and self–efficacy, seem to develop opposite predictions in this context. To reconcile these conflicting predictions, we theorize a moderating model and test the boundary conditions of both theories. Relying on two experimental studies, we find that prospect theory explains reentry intentions of entrepreneurs who have lost money when their self–efficacy is moderate or low. Thereby, we provide an explanation for the puzzling empirical finding that so many failed entrepreneurs reenter entrepreneurship even if failure has undermined their self–efficacy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AiA.L., CascioT., SantangeloL.K., & Evans–CampbellT. (2005). Hope, meaning, and growth following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(5), 523–548.
2.
AjzenI. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
3.
AronsonE., EllsworthP.C., CarlsmithJ.M., & GonzalesM.H. (1990). Methods of research in social psychology (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw–Hill.
4.
AronsonE., WilsonT.D., & BrewerM.B. (1998). Experimentation in social psychology. In GilbertD.T., FiskeS.T., & LindzeyG. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 99–142). New York: McGraw–Hill.
5.
ArrowK.J. (1971). Essays in the theory of risk–bearing. Chicago, IL: Markham Publishing Company.
6.
BanduraA. (1977). Self–efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.
7.
BanduraA. (1978). The self system in reciprocal determinism. American Psychologist, 33(4), 344–358.
8.
BanduraA. (1982). Self–efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147.
9.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice–Hall.
10.
BanduraA. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self–regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248–287.
11.
BanduraA. (1997). Self–efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman & Company.
12.
BanduraA. (2002). Growing primacy of human agency in adaptation and change in the electronic era. European Psychologist, 7(1), 2–16.
13.
BanduraA. (2012). On the functional properties of perceived self–efficacy revisited. Journal of Management, 38(1), 9–44.
14.
BarbosaS.D., GerhardtM.W., & KickulJ.R. (2007). The role of cognitive style and risk preference on entrepreneurial self–efficacy and entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 13(4), 86–104.
15.
BaronR.A. (2004). The cognitive perspective: A valuable tool for answering entrepreneurship's basic. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 221–239.
16.
BaronR.A., ZhaoH., & MiaoQ. (2012). Personal motives, moral disengagement, and unethical decisions by entrepreneurs: Potential dangers of the desire for financial success. Paper presented at the Babson College Entrepreneurship Research Conference.
17.
BaumJ.R. & LockeE.A. (2004). The relationship of entrepreneurial traits, skill, and motivation to subsequent venture growth. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(4), 587–598.
18.
BertiniM. & WathieuL. (2008). Research note—Attention arousal through price partitioning. Marketing Science, 27(2), 236–246.
19.
BlockL.G. & KellerP.A. (1995). When to accentuate the negative: The effects of perceived efficacy and message framing on intentions to perform a health–related behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 32(2), 192–203.
20.
BoydN.G. & VozikisG.S. (1994). The influence of self–efficacy on the development of entrepreneurial intentions and actions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(4), 63–77.
21.
BusenitzL.W. & BarneyJ.B. (1997). Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision–making. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(1), 9–30.
22.
CamererC.F. (2004). Prospect theory in the wild: Evidence from the field. In CamererC.F., LoewensteinG., & RabiM. (Eds.), Advances in behavioral economics (pp. 148–161). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
23.
ChenC.C., GreeneP.G., & CrickA. (1998). Does entrepreneurial self–efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers?Journal of Business Venturing, 13(4), 295–316.
24.
CheungG.W. & LauR.S. (2008). Testing mediation and suppression effects of latent variables bootstrapping with structural equation models. Organizational Research Methods, 11(2), 296–325.
25.
CohenJ., CohenP., WestS.G., & AikenL.S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, Vol. 1. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26.
ColquittJ.A. (2008). From the editors publishing laboratory research in AMJ: A question of when, not if. Academy of Management Journal, 51(4), 616–620.
27.
CongerA.J. (1974). A revised definition for suppressor variables: A guide to their identification and interpretation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34(1), 35–46.
28.
CooperA.C., Gimeno–GasconF.J., & WooC.Y. (1994). Initial human and financial capital as predictors of new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 9(5), 371–395.
29.
CorbettA.C. (2007). Learning asymmetries and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 97–118.
30.
DasT. & TengB.S. (1997). Time and entrepreneurial risk behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 22(2), 69–88.
31.
DavidssonP. & HonigB. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 301–331.
32.
De NobleA., JungD., & EhrlichB. (1999). Enntrepreneurial self–efficacy: The development of a measure and its relationship to entrepreneurial intentions and actions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(4), 63–77.
33.
DouglasE.J. (2013). Reconstructing entrepreneurial intentions to identify predisposition for growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(5), 633–651.
34.
EdwardsJ.R. (2009). Seven deadly myths of testing moderation in organizational research. In LanceC.E. & VandenbergR.J. (Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity and fable in the organizational and social sciences (pp. 143–164). New York: Routledge.
35.
ErezA. & IsenA.M. (2002). The influence of positive affect on the components of expectancy motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(6), 1055–1067.
36.
FitzsimmonsJ.R. & DouglasE.J. (2011). Interaction between feasibility and desirability in the formation of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(4), 431–440.
37.
FooM.D., UyM.A., & BaronR.A. (2009). How do feelings influence effort? An empirical study of entrepreneurs’ affect and venture effort. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 1086–1094.
38.
ForlaniD. & MullinsJ.W. (2000). Perceived risks and choices in entrepreneurs’ new venture decisions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(4), 305–322.
39.
GimenoJ., FoltaT.B., CooperA.C., & WooC.Y. (1997). Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial human capital and the persistence of underperforming firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(4), 750–783.
40.
GistM.E. (1987). Self–efficacy: Implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 12(3), 472–485.
41.
GistM.E. & MitchellT.R. (1992). Self–efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 183–211.
42.
GompersP., KovnerA., LernerJ., & ScharfsteinD. (2006). Skill vs. luck in entrepreneurship and venture capital: Evidence from serial entrepreneurs [Electronic Version]. Available at http://www.nber.org/papers/w12592, accessed 25 October 2013.
43.
GompersP., KovnerA., LernerJ., & ScharfsteinD. (2010). Performance persistence in entrepreneurship. Journal of Financial Economics, 96(1), 18–32.
44.
GuptaV.K., TurbanD.B., & BhaweN.M. (2008). The effect of gender stereotype activation on entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 1053–1061.
45.
HallahanK. (1999). Seven models of framing: Implications for public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 11(3), 205–242.
46.
HarrisonG.W. & ListJ.A. (2004). Field experiments. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(4), 1009–1055.
47.
HigginsE.T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 1–46.
48.
HigginsE.T., FriedmanR.S., HarlowR.E., IdsonL.C., AydukO.N., & TaylorA. (2001). Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(1), 3–23.
49.
HsuD.K., HaynieJ.M., SimmonsS.A., & McKelvieA. (2014). What matters, matters differently: A conjoint analysis of the decision policies of angel and venture capital investors. Venture Capital, 16(1), 1–25.
50.
JacobsonP. (Writer). (2005). Ben & Jerry's. In A. Martinez (Producer): The Biography Channel.
51.
JenkinsA.S., WiklundJ., & BrundinE. (2014). Individual responses to firm failure: Appraisals, grief, and the influence of prior failure experience. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 17–33.
52.
KahnemanD. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. American Economic Review, 93, 1449–1475.
53.
KahnemanD. & TverskyA. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 47(2), 263–291.
54.
KahnemanD. & TverskyA. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39(4), 341–350.
55.
KatzJ. & GartnerW.B. (1988). Properties of emerging organizations. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 429–441.
56.
KnightF.H. (2002). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Washington, DC: Beard Books.
57.
KoellingerP., MinnitiM., & SchadeC. (2007). “I think I can, I think I can”: Overconfidence and entrepreneurial behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28(4), 502–527.
58.
KruegerN.F. (1993). The impact of prior entrepreneurial exposure on perceptions of new venture feasibility and desirability. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(1), 5–21.
59.
KruegerN.F. & DicksonP.R. (1994). How believing in ourselves increases risk taking: Perceived self efficacy and opportunity recognition. Decision Sciences, 25(3), 385–400.
60.
KruegerN.F., ReillyM.D., & CarsrudA.L. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5), 411–432.
61.
KühbergerA. (1998). The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta–analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75(1), 23–55.
62.
LeeJ.H. & VenkataramanS. (2006). Aspirations, market offerings, and the pursuit of entrepreneurial opportunities. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(1), 107–123.
63.
LevinI.P. & GaethG.J. (1988). How consumers are affected by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(3), 374–378.
64.
LevyJ.S. (1994). Introduction to prospect theory. In FarnhamB. (Ed.), Avoiding losses/taking risks: Prospect theory and international conflict (pp. 7–22). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
65.
LiñánF. & ChenY.W. (2009). Development and cross cultural application of a specific instrument to measure entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 593–617.
66.
LyubomirskyS. & LepperH.S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46(2), 137–155.
67.
McGeeJ.E., PetersonM., MuellerS.L., & SequeiraJ.M. (2009). Entrepreneurial self–efficacy: Refining the measure. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(4), 965–988.
68.
MullinsJ.W. & ForlaniD. (2005). Missing the boat or sinking the boat: A study of new venture decision making. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(1), 47–69.
69.
PajaresF. (2008). Motivational role of self–efficacy beliefs in self–regulated learning. In SchunkD.H. & ZimmermanB.J. (Eds.), Motivation and self–regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 111–139). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
70.
PalichL.E. & BagbyD.R. (1995). Using cognitive theory to explain entrepreneurial risk–taking: Challenging conventional wisdom. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(6), 425–438.
71.
PandeyS. & ElliottW. (2010). Suppressor variables in social work research: Ways to identify in multiple regression models. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 1(1), 28–40.
72.
PedhazurE.J. (1997). Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction (3rd ed.). San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace College.
73.
PenningsJ.M. & SmidtsA. (2003). The shape of utility functions and organizational behavior. Management Science, 49(9), 1251–1263.
74.
RauchA. & FreseM. (2007). Let's put the person back into entrepreneurship research: A meta–analysis on the relationship between business owners’ personality traits, business creation, and success. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 16(4), 353–385.
75.
RogoffE.G., LeeM.S., & SuhD.C. (2004). “Who done it?” Attributions by entrepreneurs and experts of the factors that cause and impede small business success. Journal of Small Business Management, 42(4), 364–376.
76.
ShadishW.R., CookT.D., & CampbellD.T. (2002). Experimental and quasi–experimental designs for generalized causal inference. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
77.
ShaneS.A. (2008). The illusions of entrepreneurship: The costly myths that entrepreneurs, investors, and policy makers live by. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
78.
ShaneS.A. & VenkataramanS. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.
79.
SilverW.S., MitchellT.R., & GistM.E. (1995). Responses to successful and unsuccessful performance: The moderating effect of self–efficacy on the relationship between performance and attributions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62(3), 286–299.
80.
SimmonsS.A., WiklundJ., & LevieJ. (2014). Stigma and business failure: Implications for entrepreneurs’ career choices. Small Business Economics, 42(3), 485–505.
81.
SimonM., HoughtonS.M., & SavelliS. (2003). Out of the frying pan …?: Why small business managers introduce high–risk products. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 419–440.
82.
SitkinS.B. & PabloA.L. (1992). Reconceptualizing the determinants of risk behavior. Academy of Management Review, 17(1), 9–38.
83.
SouitarisV., ZerbinatiS., & Al–LahamA. (2007). Do entrepreneurship programmes raise entrepreneurial intention of science and engineering students? The effect of learning, inspiration and resources. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 566–591.
84.
SpivackA.J., McKelvieA., & HaynieJ.M. (2014). Habitual entrepreneurs: Possible cases of entrepreneurship addiction?Journal of Business Venturing, 29, 651–667.
85.
StajkovicA.D. & SommerS.M. (2006). Self–efficacy and causal attributions: Direct and reciprocal links. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(4), 707–737.
86.
StamW. & ElfringT. (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation and new venture performance: The moderating role of intra–and extraindustry social capital. Academy of Management Journal, 51(1), 97–111.
87.
StewartW.H. & RothP.L. (2001). Risk propensity differences between entrepreneurs and managers: A meta–analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 145–153.
88.
StoneD.N. (1994). Overconfidence in initial self–efficacy judgments: Effects on decision processes and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 59(3), 452–474.
ThalerR.H. & JohnsonE.J. (1990). Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Science, 36(6), 643–660.
91.
ThompsonE.R. (2009). Individual entrepreneurial intent: Construct clarification and development of an internationally reliable metric. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 669–694.
92.
TumasjanA., WelpeI., & SpörrleM. (2013). Easy now, desirable later: The moderating role of temporal distance in opportunity evaluation and exploitation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(4), 859–888.
93.
TverskyA. & KahnemanD. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458.
94.
TverskyA. & KahnemanD. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business, 59(4), 251–278.
95.
UcbasaranD., ShepherdD.A., LockettA., & LyonS.J. (2013). Life after business failure: The process and consequences of business failure for entrepreneurs. Journal of Management, 39, 163–202.
96.
UcbasaranD., WestheadP., WrightM., & BinksM. (2003). Does entrepreneurial experience influence opportunity identification?The Journal of Private Equity, 7(1), 7–14.
97.
UcbasaranD., WestheadP., WrightM., & FloresM. (2010). The nature of entrepreneurial experience, business failure and comparative optimism. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(6), 541–555.
98.
van't RietJ., RuiterR.A., WerrijM.Q., & de VriesH. (2008). The influence of self–efficacy on the effects of framed health messages. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(5), 800–809.
99.
van't RietJ., RuiterR.A., WerrijM.Q., & de VriesH. (2010). Self–efficacy moderates message–framing effects: The case of skin–cancer detection. Psychology and Health, 25(3), 339–349.
100.
WangX.T., SimonsF., & BrédartS. (2001). Social cues and verbal framing in risky choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 14(1), 1–15.
101.
WennbergK., WiklundJ., DeTienneD.R., & CardonM.S. (2010). Reconceptualizing entrepreneurial exit: Divergent exit routes and their drivers. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(4), 361–375.
102.
WerrijM.Q., RuiterR.A., RietJ.V.T., & de VriesH. (2011). Self–efficacy as a potential moderator of the effects of framed health messages. Journal of Health Psychology, 16(2), 199–207.
103.
WestheadP. & WrightM. (1998). Novice, portfolio, and serial founders: Are they different?Journal of Business Venturing, 13(3), 173–204.
104.
WoodR. & BanduraA. (1989). Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 361–384.
105.
WrightM., RobbieK., & EnnewC. (1997). Venture capitalists and serial entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(3), 227–249.
106.
ZhaoH., SeibertS.E., & HillsG.E. (2005). The mediating role of self–efficacy in the development of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1265–1272.
