Family firms’ decisions to hire nonfamily managers are influenced by agency costs, socioemotional wealth concerns, and the availability of high–quality nonfamily managers in the labor pool. We hypothesize that owing to these factors, family ownership and intrafamily succession intentions will be negatively associated with the proportion of nonfamily managers in private small– and medium–sized (SME) family firms. However, firm size is hypothesized to positively moderate those relationships because as family firm size increases, the benefits of hiring nonfamily managers rise faster than the costs. Tobit regression analyses of 7,299 private SMEs support our hypotheses.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AstrachanJ.H. & KolenkoT.A. (1994). A neglected factor explaining family business success: Human resource practices. Family Business Review, 7, 251–262.
2.
BarberA.E., WessonM.J., RobersonQ.M., & TaylorM.S. (1999). A tale of two job markets: Organizational size and its effects on hiring practices and job search behavior. Personnel Psychology, 52, 841–868.
3.
BarnettT. & KellermannsF.W. (2006). Are we family and are we treated as family? Non–family employees’ perceptions of justice in the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 837–854.
4.
BarnettT., LongR.G., & MarlerL.E. (2012). Vision and exchange in intra–family succession: Effects on procedural justice climate among non–family managers. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, 1207–1225.
5.
BennedsenM., NielsenK.M., Pérez–GonzálezF., & WolfenzonD. (2007). Inside the family firm: The role of families in succession decisions and performance. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122, 647–691.
6.
BerroneP., CruzC., & Gómez–MejíaL.R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25, 258–279.
7.
BlockJ.H. (2011). How to pay non–family managers in large family firms: A principal–agent model. Family Business Review, 24, 9–27.
8.
BlumentrittT.P., KeytA.D., & AstrachanJ.H. (2007). Creating an environment for successful non–family CEOs: An exploratory study of good principals. Family Business Review, 20, 321–335.
9.
CarlsonD., UptonN., & SeamanS. (2006). The impact of human resource practices and compensation design on performance: An analysis of family–owned SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 44, 531–543.
10.
CarneyM. (2005). Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family–controlled firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 249–265.
11.
ChangE.P., ChrismanJ.J., ChuaJ.H., & KellermannsF.K. (2008). Regional economy as a determinant of the prevalence of family firms in the United States: A preliminary report. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 559–573.
12.
ChiricoF. & NordqvistM. (2010). Dynamic capabilities and trans–generational value creation in family firms: The role of organizational culture. International Small Business Journal, 28, 487–504.
13.
ChittoorR. & DasR. (2007). Professionalization of management and succession performance: A vital linkage. Family Business Review, 20, 65–79.
14.
ChrismanJ.J., ChuaJ.H., & LitzR. (2004). Comparing the agency costs of family and non–family firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28, 335–354.
15.
ChrismanJ.J., ChuaJ.H., PearsonA.W., & BarnettT. (2012). Family involvement, family influence, and family–centered non–economic goals in small firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, 267–293.
16.
ChrismanJ.J., MemiliE., & MisraK. (2014). Non–family managers, family firms, and the winner's curse: The influence of non–economic goals and bounded rationality. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38, 1103–1127.
17.
ChuaJ.H., ChrismanJ.J., & BergielE.B. (2009). An agency theoretic analysis of the professionalized family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 355–372.
18.
ChuaJ.H., ChrismanJ.J., & ChangE.P.C. (2004). Are family firms born or made? An exploratory investigation. Family Business Review, 17, 37–54.
19.
ChuaJ.H., ChrismanJ.J., KellermannsF., & WuZ. (2011). Family involvement and new venture debt financing. Journal of Business Venturing, 26, 472–488.
20.
ChuaJ.H., ChrismanJ.J., & SharmaP. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(4), 19–40.
21.
ChuaJ.H., ChrismanJ.J., & SharmaP. (2003). Succession and non–succession concerns of family firms and agency relationship with non–family managers. Family Business Review, 16, 89–107.
22.
ChuaJ.H., ChrismanJ.J., SteierL.P., & RauS.B. (2012). Sources of heterogeneity in family firms: An introduction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, 1103–1113.
23.
ColomboM.G., De MassisA., PivaE., Rossi–LamastraC., & WrightM. (2014). Sales and employment changes in entrepreneurial ventures with family ownership: Empirical evidence from high–tech industries. Journal of Small Business Management, 52, 226–245.
24.
CorbettaG. & SalvatoC. (2004). Self–serving or self–actualizing? Models of man and agency costs in different types of family firms: A commentary on “Comparing the agency costs of family and non–family firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence.”Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28, 355–362.
25.
CromieS., StephensonB., & MonteithD. (1995). The management of family firms: An empirical investigation. International Small Business Journal, 13, 11–34.
26.
CruzC., Gómez–MejíaL., & BecerraM. (2010). Perceptions of benevolence and the design of agency contracts: CEO–TMT relationships in family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 69–89.
27.
De MassisA. (2012). Family involvement and procedural justice climate among non–family managers: The effects of affect, social identities, trust, and risk of non–reciprocity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, 1227–1234.
28.
De MassisA., ChuaJ.H., & ChrismanJ.J. (2008). Factors preventing intra–family succession. Family Business Review, 21, 183–199.
29.
De MassisA., KotlarJ., ChuaJ.H., & ChrismanJ.J. (2014). Ability and willingness as sufficiency conditions for family–oriented particularistic behavior: Implications for theory and empirical studies. Journal of Small Business Management, 52, 344–364.
30.
DeshpandeS.P. & GolharD.Y. (1994). HRM practices in large and small manufacturing firms: A comparative study. Journal of Small Business Management, 32, 49–56.
31.
EddlestonK.A. (2008). Commentary: The prequel to family firm culture and stewardship: The leadership perspective of the founder. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 1055–1061.
32.
EddlestonK.A., OtondoR.F., & KellermannsF.W. (2008). Conflict, participative decision–making, and generational ownership dispersion: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Small Business Management, 46, 456–484.
33.
EisenhardtK.M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. The Academy of Management Review, 14, 57–74.
34.
EnsleyM.D. (2006). Family businesses can out–compete: As long as they are willing to question the chosen path. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 747–754.
FamaE.F. & JensenM.C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301–325.
37.
FangH., MemiliE., ChrismanJ.J., & PenneyC. (Forthcoming). Industry and information asymmetry: The case of the employment of non–family managers in small and medium–sized family firms. To appear in Journal of Small Business Management.
38.
GersickK.E., DavisJ.A., HamptonM.M., & LansbergI. (1997). Generation to generation: Life cycles of the family business. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
39.
Gómez–MejíaL.R., CruzC., BerroneP., & De CastroJ. (2011). The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. The Academy of Management Annals, 5, 653–707.
40.
Gómez–MejíaL.R., HaynesK.T., Núñez–NickelM., JacobsonK.J., & Monyano–FuentesH. (2007). Socio–emotional wealth and business risk in family–controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 106–137.
41.
GrandoriA. (Ed.). (2004). Corporate governance and firm organization: Microfoundations and structural forms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42.
GubittaP. & GianecchiniM. (2002). Governance and flexibility in family–owned SMEs. Family Business Review, 15, 277–297.
43.
HallA. & NordqvistM. (2008). Professional management in family businesses: Toward an extended understanding. Family Business Review, 21, 51–69.
44.
HamiltonB.H. & NickersonJ.A. (2003). Correcting for endogeneity in strategic management research. Strategic Organization, 1, 51–78.
45.
HenemanR.L., TanskyJ.W., & CampS.M. (2000). Human resource management practices in small and medium–sized enterprises: Unanswered questions and future research perspectives. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25, 11–26.
46.
IliasN. (2006). Families and firms: Agency costs and labor market imperfections in Sialkot's surgical industry. Journal of Development Economics, 80, 329–349.
47.
JamesH.S. (1999). Owner as manager, extended horizons and the family firm. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 6, 41–55.
48.
JensenM.C. & MecklingW.H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and economic organization. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–350.
49.
JensenM.C. & MecklingW.H. (1994). Self–interest, altruism, incentives, and agency theory. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 7, 40–45.
50.
KanukL. & BerensonC. (1975). Mail surveys and response rate: A literature review. Journal of Marketing Research, 22, 440–453.
51.
KarraN., TraceyP., & PhillipsN. (2006). Altruism and agency in the family firm: Exploring the role of family, kinship, and ethnicity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 861–877.
52.
KingA.A. & LenoxM.J. (2000). Industry self–regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry's 33 responsible care program. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 698–716.
53.
KoteyB. (2005). Goals, management practices, and performance of family SMEs. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 11, 3–24.
54.
KoteyB. & FolkerC. (2007). Employee training in SMEs: Effect of size and firm type—Family and non–family. Journal of Small Business Management, 45, 214–238.
55.
KotlarJ., De MassisA., FangH., & FrattiniF. (2013). Strategic reference points in family firms. Small Business Economics, 43, 597–619.
56.
KotlarJ., FangH., De MassisA., & FrattiniF. (2014). Profitability goals, control goals, and the R&D investment decisions of family and non–family firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31, 1128–1145.
57.
Le Breton–MillerL. & MillerD. (2006). Why do some family businesses out–compete? Governance, long–term orientations, and sustainable capability. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 731–746.
58.
Le Breton–MillerI., MillerD., & LesterR.H. (2011). Stewardship or agency? A social embeddedness reconciliation of conduct and performance in public family businesses. Organization Science, 22, 704–721.
59.
LeeK.S., LimG.H., & LimW.S. (2003). Family business succession: Appropriation risk and choice of successor. Academy of Management Review, 28, 657–666.
60.
LepoutreJ. & HeeneA. (2006). Investigating the impact of firm size on small business social responsibility: A critical review. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 257–273.
61.
LesterR.H. & CannellaA.A. (2006). Interorganizational familiness: How family firms use interlocking directorates to build community–level social capital. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 755–775.
62.
LumpkinG.T. & BrighamK.H. (2011). Long–term orientation and intertemporal choice in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35, 1149–1169.
63.
MartínezJ.I., StöhrB.S., & QuirogaB.F. (2007). Family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from public companies in Chile. Family Business Review, 20, 83–94.
64.
MelinL. & NordqvistM. (2007). The reflexive dynamics of institutionalization: The case of the family business. Strategic Organization, 5, 321–333.
65.
MemiliE., MisraK., ChangE.P.C., & ChrismanJ.J. (2013). The propensity to use non–family managers’ incentive compensation in small and medium size family firms. Journal of Family Business Management, 3, 62–80.
66.
MitchellR.K., MorseE.A., & SharmaP. (2003). The transacting cognitions of non–family employees in the family businesses setting. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 533–551.
67.
OppenheimA.N. (1966). Questionnaire design and attitude measurement. New York: Free Press.
68.
ParadaM.J., NordqvistM., & GimenoA. (2010). Institutionalizing the family business: The role of professional associations in fostering a change of values. Family Business Review, 26, 1–18.
69.
PollakR.A. (1985). A transaction cost approach to families and households. Journal of Economic Literature, 23, 581–608.
70.
RobertsI., SawbridgeD., & BamberG. (1992). Employee relations in small firms. In TowersB.A. (Ed.), Handbook of industrial relations practice (pp. 240–257). London: Kogan.
71.
SchulzeW.S., LubatkinM.H., DinoR.N., & BuchholtzA.K. (2001). Agency relationship in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12, 99–116.
72.
SharmaP. (2004). An overview of the field of family business studies: Current status and directions for the future. Family Business Review, 17, 1–36.
73.
SharmaP., ChrismanJ.J., & ChuaJ.H. (2003). Predictors of satisfaction with the succession process in family firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 667–687.
74.
SharmaP., SalvatoC., & ReayT. (2014). Temporal dimensions of family enterprise research. Family Business Review, 27, 10–19.
75.
ShepherdD. & HaynieJ.M. (2009). Family business, identity conflict, and an expedited entrepreneurial process: A process of resolving identity conflict. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 1245–1264.
SonfieldM.C. & LussierR.N. (2009). Non–family–members in the family business management team: A multinational investigation. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 5, 395–415.
78.
StewartA. & HittM. (2012). Why can't a family business be more like a non–family business? Modes of professionalization in family firms. Family Business Review, 25, 58–86.
79.
VandekerkhofP., SteijversT., HendriksW., & VoordeckersW. (2014). The effect of organizational characteristics on the appointment of non–family managers in private family firms: The moderating role of socioemotional wealth. Family Business Review. doi: 10.1177/0894486513514274.
80.
VerbekeA. & KanoL. (2012). The transaction cost economics theory of the family firm: Family–based human asset specificity and the bifurcation bias. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, 1183–1205.
81.
WestheadP. & HoworthC. (2007). Types of private family firms: An exploratory conceptual and empirical analysis. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 19, 405–431.
82.
WhiteH. (1980). A heteroskedasticity–consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48, 817–838.
83.
WrightM., ChrismanJ.J., ChuaJ.H., & SteierL. (2014). Family enterprise and context. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38, 1247–1260.
84.
WuS., JamesM.X., WangB., & JungJ.Y. (2012). An agency approach to family business success in different economic conditions. International Journal of Management Practice, 5, 25–36.
85.
ZellwegerT.M., KellermannsF.W., ChrismanJ.J., & ChuaJ.H. (2012). Family control and family firm valuation by family CEOs: The importance of intentions for trans–generational control. Organization Science, 23, 851–868.
