The nascent crowdfunding literature has highlighted the existence of a self–reinforcing pattern whereby contributions received in the early days of a campaign accelerate its success. After discussing what sustains this pattern, we maintain that the internal social capital that proponents may develop inside the crowdfunding community provides crucial assistance in igniting a self–reinforcing mechanism. Results of an econometric analysis of a sample of 669 Kickstarter projects are consistent with this view. Moreover, the effect of internal social capital on the success of a campaign is fully mediated by the capital and backers collected in the campaign's early days.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdlerP.S. & KwonS. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40.
2.
AfuahA. & TucciC. (2012). Crowdsourcing as a solution to distant search. Academy of Management Review, 37(3), 355–375.
3.
AgrawalA., CataliniC., & GoldfarbA. (2011). The geography of crowdfunding. NBER Working Paper No. w16820. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1770375, accessed July 6 2014.
4.
AgrawalA., CataliniC., & GoldfarbA. (2014). Some simple economics of crowdfunding. In LernerJ., & SternS. (Eds.), NBER book series: Innovation policy and the economy (Vol. 14). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
ArndtJ. (1967). The role of product–related conversations in the diffusion of a new product. Journal of Marketing Research, 4(3), 291–295.
7.
BanerjeeA.V. (1992). A simple model of herd behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(3), 797–817.
8.
BelleflammeP., LambertT., & SchwienbacherA. (2014). Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(5), 585–609.
9.
BikhchandaniS., HirshleiferD., & WelchI. (1998). Learning from the behavior of others: Conformity, fads, and informational cascades. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(3), 151–170.
10.
BolinoM.C., TurnleyW.H., & BlooddgoodJ.M. (2002). Citizenship behavior and the creation of social capital in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 27(4), 505–522.
11.
BurtR.S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349–399.
12.
CaiH., ChenY., & FangH. (2009). Observational learning: Evidence from a randomized natural field experiment. American Economic Review, 99(3), 864–882.
13.
ChengY.Q., WangQ., & XieJ. (2011). Online social interactions: A natural experiment on word of mouth versus observational learning. Journal Marketing Research,48(2), 238–254.
14.
ColemanJ.S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
DellarocasC. (2003). The digitization of word of mouth: Promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Management Science, 49(10), 1407–1424.
16.
DuanW., GuB., & WhinstonH.B. (2009). Information cascades and software adoption on the Internet: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 33(1), 23–48.
GedajlovicE., HonigB., MooreB., CurtC.B., PayneT.G., & WrightM. (2013). Social capital and entrepreneurship: A schema and a research agenda. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(3), 455–478.
20.
GerberE.M., HuiJ.S., & KuoP.Y. (2012). Crowdfunding: Why people are motivated to post and fund projects on crowdfunding platforms. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Design, Influence, and Social Technologies: Techniques, Impacts and Ethics.
HallB.H. (2002). The financing of research and development. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18(1), 35–51.
23.
HanJ.Y. & AnatH. (2013). To bridge or to bond? Diverse social connections in an IS project team. International Journal of Project Management, 31(1), 378–390.
24.
HartiganJ. & HartiganP. (1985). The dip test of unimodality. Annals of Statistics, 13, 70–84.
HildebrandT., PuriM., & RochollJ. (2013). Adverse incentives in crowdfunding. SSRN Working Paper. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1615483, accessed 7 July 2014.
27.
KaleP., SinghH., & PerlmutterH. (1990). Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: Building relational capital. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 217–237.
28.
KappelT. (2009). Ex ante crowdfunding and the recording industry: A model for the U.S. Loyola of Los Angeles. Entertainment Law Review, 3(3), 375–385.
29.
KauffmanR.J., LaiH., & LinH. (2011). Consumer adoption of group–buying auctions: An experimental study. Information Technology and Management, 11(4), 191–211.
30.
KothaR. & GeorgeG. (2012). Friends, family, or fools: Entrepreneur experience and its implications for equity distribution and resource mobilization. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(5), 525–543.
LeanaC.R. & PilF.K. (2006). Social capital and organizational performance: Evidence from urban public schools. Organization Science, 17(3), 353–366.
33.
LeanaC.R. & Van BurenH.J. (1999). Organizational social capital and employment. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 538–555.
34.
LinM., PrabhalaN.R., & ViswanathanS. (2013). Judging borrowers by the company they keep: Friendship networks and information asymmetry in online peer–to–peer lending. Management Science, 59(1), 17–35.
MarkusL. (1990). Toward a “critical mass” theory of interactive media. In FulkC.S.J. (Ed.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 194–218). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
37.
MaurerI., BartschV., & EbersM. (2011). The value of intra–organizational social capital: How it fosters knowledge transfer, innovation performance, and growth. Organization Studies, 32(2), 157–185.
38.
McDonaldJ.F. & MoffitR.A. (1980). The uses of Tobit analysis. Review of Economics and Statistics, 62(2), 318–321.
39.
MetiuA. & KogutB. (2001). Open–source software development and distributed innovation. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 17(2), 248–264.
NahapietJ. & GhoshalS. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.
42.
OhW. & JeonS. (2007). Membership herding and network stability in the open source community: The Ising perspective. Management Science, 53(7), 1086–1101.
43.
OrdaniniA., MiceliL., PizzettiM., & ParasuramanA. (2011). Crowd–funding: Transforming customers into investors through innovative service platforms. Journal of Service Management, 22(4), 443–470.
44.
PayneG.T., MooreB.C., GriffisS.E., & AutryC.W. (2011). Multilevel challenges and opportunities in social capital research. Journal of Management, 37(2), 491–520.
45.
PortesA. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 4, 1–24.
46.
PutnamR.D. (1995). Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65–78.
47.
RowleyT.B. (2000). Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 369–386.
48.
SalganikM.J., DoddsP.S., & WattsD.J. (2006). Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science, 311, 854–856.
49.
SchellingT.C. (1978). Micromotives and macrobehavior. New York: W.W. Norton.
50.
ShaneS. & CableD. (2002). Network ties, reputation, and the financing of new ventures. Management Science, 48(3), 364–381.
51.
ShaneS. & StuartT. (2002). Organizational Endowments and the Performance of University Start–ups. Management Science, 48(1), 154–170.
52.
ShaneS.A. (2009). Fool's gold?New York: Oxford University Press.
53.
SimonsohnU. & ArielyD. (2008). When rational sellers face nonrational buyers: Evidence from herding on eBay. Management Science, 54(9), 1624–1637.
54.
SobelM.E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290–312.
55.
SpenceM. (2002). Signaling in retrospect and the informational structure of markets. American Economic Review, 92(3), 434–459.
TsaiW. & GhoshalS. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. The Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464–476.
58.
von KroghG., Rossi–LamastraC., & HaefligerS. (2012). Phenomenon–based research in management and organization science: When is it rigorous and does it matter. Long Range Planning, 45(4), 277–298.
59.
WaskoM.M. & FarajS. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic network of practice. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35–57.
60.
WestlundH., RuttenR., & BoekemaF. (2010). Social capital, distance, borders and levels of space: Conclusions and further issues. European Planning Studies, 18(6), 965–969.
