BarberisD. S., (2003), ‘In search of an object: Organicist sociology and the reality of society in finde-siècle France’, History of the Human Sciences, 16 (3): 51–72.
3.
BearmanP., (2008), ‘Introduction: Exploring genetics and social structure’, American Journal of Sociology, 114 (S1): v–x.
4.
BearmanP.MartinM.ShostakS. (eds), (2008), ‘Exploring genetics and social structure’, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 114, No. S1.
5.
BentonT., (1991), ‘Biology and social science: Why the return of the repressed should be given a (cautious) welcome’, Sociology, 25 (1): 1–29.
6.
BoneJ., (2009), ‘Beyond biophobia: A response to Jackson and Rees’, Sociology, 41 (5): 917–930.
7.
ConnollyW., (2002), Neuropolitics, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
8.
CrombyJ., (2004), ‘Between constructionism and neuroscience, the societal co-constitution of embodied subjectivity’, Theory & Psychology, 14: 797–821.
9.
CrombyJ., (2005), ‘Theorizing embodied subjectivity’, International Journal of Critical Psychology, 15: 133–150.
10.
CrombyJ., (2007), ‘Integrating social science with neuroscience: Potentials and problems’, BioSocieties, 2: 149–169.
11.
de WaalF., (1996), Good-Natured: The Origins of Right and Wrong in Human and Other Animals, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
de WaalF., (2006), Primates and Philosophers: How Morality Evolved, ed. MacedoS.OberJ.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13.
de WaalF., (2009), The Age of Empathy: Nature's Lessons for a Kinder Society, New York: Three Rivers Press.
14.
DupréJ., (2012), Processes of Life: Essays in the Philosophy of Biology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
DusterT., (2015), ‘A post-genomic surprise: The molecular re-inscription of race in science, law, and medicine’, British Journal of Sociology, 66 (1): 1–27.
FranklinS.LuryC.StaceyJ., (2000), Global Nature, Global Culture, London: Sage.
18.
FranklinS., (2003), ‘Re-thinking nature–culture anthropology and the new genetics’, Anthropological Theory, 3 (1): 65–85.
19.
FranksD. D., (2010), Neurosociology: The Nexus between Neuroscience and Social Psychology, New York: Springer.
20.
FranksD. D.SmithT. S. (eds), (1999), Mind, Brain, and Society: Toward a Neurosociology of Emotion, Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
21.
FranksD. D.TurnerJ. H., (2013), Handbook of Neurosociology, New York: Springer.
22.
FreeseJ.AllenLiJ. C.WadeL. D., (2003), ‘The potential relevance of biology to social inquiry’, Annual Review of Sociology, 29: 233–256.
23.
FreeseJ.ShostakS., (2009), ‘Genetics and social inquiry’, Annual Review of Sociology, 35: 107–128.
24.
FreundP. E. S., (1988), ‘Bringing society into the body: Understanding socialized human nature’, Theory and Society, 17: 839–864.
25.
FrostS., (2016), Biocultural Creatures: Toward a New Theory of the Human, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
26.
FullerS., (2007), Science v. Religion? Intelligent Design and the Problem of Evolution, Cambridge: Polity Press.
27.
GilbertS. F., (2003), ‘The reactive genome’, in MullerG. B.NewmanS. A. (eds), Origination of Organismal Form: Beyond the Gene in Developmental and Evolutionary Biology, 87–101, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28.
GilbertS. F.SappJ.TauberA. I., (2012), ‘A symbiotic view of life: We have never been individuals’, The Quarterly Review of Biology, 87 (4): 325–341.
29.
GissisS., (2002), ‘Late nineteenth century Lamarckism and French sociology’, Perspectives on Science, 10 (1): 69–122.
30.
GoodmanA., (2013), ‘Bringing culture into human biology and biology back into anthropology’, American Anthropologist, 115 (3): 359–373.
31.
GravleeC., (2009), ‘How race becomes biology: Embodiment of social inequality’, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 139: 47–57.
32.
GravleeC. C.DresslerW. W.BernardH. R., (2005), ‘Skin color, social classification, and blood pressure in Southeastern Puerto Rico’, American Journal of Public Health, 95 (12): 2191–2197.
33.
GreeneJ. D., (2003), ‘From neural “is” to moral “ought”: What are the moral implications of neuroscientific moral psychology?’, Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4: 847–850.
34.
GreeneJ.HaidtJ., (2002), ‘How (and where) does moral judgment work?’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6: 517–523.
35.
GriffithsP.StotzK., (2013), Genetics and Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
GuoG., (2006), ‘The linking of sociology and biology’, Social Forces, 85: 145–149.
37.
GuoG.RoettgerM. E.CaiT., (2008), ‘The integration of genetic propensities into socialcontrol models of delinquency and violence among male youths’, American Sociological Review, 73 (4): 543–568.
38.
GuthmanJ.MansfieldB., (2013), ‘The implications of environmental epigenetics: A new direction for geographic inquiry on health, space, and nature-society relations’, Progress in Human Geography, 27 (4): 486–504.
39.
HaidtJ., (2001), ‘The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment’, Psychological Review, 108: 814–834.
40.
HaidtJ., (2007), ‘The new synthesis in moral psychology’, Science, 316: 998–1002.
41.
HancockA.-M., (2013), ‘Neurobiology, intersectionality, and politics: Paradigm warriors in arms?’Perspectives on Politics, 2: 504–507.
42.
HarawayD., (1991), ‘A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology and socialist feminism in the late twentieth century’, in HarawayD. (ed.), Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, 149–181, London: Free Association Books.
HirstP. Q., (1973), ‘Morphology and pathology: Biological analogies and metaphors in Durkheim's The Rules of Sociological Method’, Economy and Society, 2 (1): 1–34.
45.
HolmwoodJ.ScottS., (2007), ‘Editorial foreword: Sociology and its public face(s)’, Sociology, 41 (5): 779–783.
IngoldT.PalssonG. (eds), (2013), Biosocial Becomings: Integrating Social and Biological Anthropology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48.
KatzM., (2013), ‘The biological inferiority of the undeserving poor’, Social Work and Society International, online journal, 11 (1). Available at: http://www.socwork.net/sws/article/view/359/709 (accessed November 2014).
KellerE. F., (2014), ‘From gene action to reactive genomes’, Journal of Physiology, 592 (11): 2423–2429.
51.
KriegerN., (2001), ‘Theories for social epidemiology in the 21st century: An ecosocial perspective’, International Journal of Epidemiology, 30: 668–677.
52.
KriegerN., (2005), ‘Embodiment: A conceptual glossary for epidemiology’, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59: 350–355.
53.
KriegerN., (2011), Epidemiology and People's Health: Theory and Context, New York: Oxford University Press.
54.
KriegerN.SmithG. Davey, (2004), ‘Bodies count and body counts: Social epidemiology and embodying inequality’, Epidemiology Review, 26: 92–103.
55.
KronfeldnerM., (2009), ‘“If there is nothing beyond the organic …”: Heredity and culture at the boundaries of anthropology in the work of Alfred L. Kroeber's NTM’, Zeitschrift fiir Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin, 17: 107–133.
56.
KuzawaC.SweetE., (2009), ‘Epigenetics and the embodiment of race: Developmental origins of US racial disparities in cardiovascular health’, American Journal of Human Biology, 21 (1): 2–15.
57.
LandeckerH.PanofskyA., (2013), ‘From social structure to gene regulation, and back: A critical introduction to environmental epigenetics for sociology’, Annual Review of Sociology, 39: 18–25.
58.
LappéM.LandeckerH., (2015), ‘How the genome got a life span’, New Genetics and Society, 34 (2): 152–176.
59.
LatourB., (1988), Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
60.
LatourB., (1993), We Have Never Been Modern, trans. C. Porter, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
61.
LockM., (1993), Encounters with Aging: Mythologies of Menopause in Japan and North America, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
62.
LockM., (2015), ‘Comprehending the body in the era of the epigenome’, Current Anthropology, 56 (2): 151–177.
63.
LockM.NguyenV-K., (2010), An Anthropology of Biomedicine, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
64.
LorimerJ., (2012), ‘Multinatural geographies for the Anthropocene’, Progress in Human Geography, 36 (5): 593–612.
65.
MansfieldB.GuthmanJ., (2015), ‘Epigenetic life: Biological plasticity, abnormality, and new configurations of race and reproduction’, Cultural Geographies, 22 (1): 3–20.
66.
MarcelJ.-C.GuilloD., (2006), ‘Durkheimian sociology, biology and the theory of social conflict’, International Social Science Journal, 58 (s1): 83–100.
67.
MasseyD., (2002), ‘A brief history of human society: The origin and role of emotion in social life’, American Sociological Review, 67 (1): 1–29.
68.
MasseyD., (2004), ‘Segregation and stratification: A biosocial perspective’, Du Bois Review, 1 (1): 7–25.
69.
MeloniM., (2013), ‘Moralizing biology: The appeal and limits of the new compassionate view of nature’, History of the Human Sciences, 26 (3): 82–106.
70.
MeloniM., (2014), ‘How biology became social, and what it means for social theory’, The Sociological Review, 62 (3): 593–614.
71.
MeloniM., (2015a), ‘Heredity 2.0: The Epigenetics Effect’ [Editorial] New Genetics and Society, 2/2015.
72.
MeloniM., (2015b), ‘Epigenetics for the social sciences: Justice, embodiment, and inheritance in the postgenomic age’, New Genetics and Society, 2/2015.
73.
MeloniM., (2016), Political Biology: Science and Social Values in Human Heredity from Eugenics to Epigenetics, London/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
74.
MollJ.de Oliveira-SouzaR.ZahnR., (2008a), ‘The neural basis of moral cognition: Sentiments, concepts, and values’, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124: 161–180.
75.
MollJ.de Oliveira-SouzaR.ZahnR.GrafmanJ., (2008b), ‘The cognitive neuroscience of moral emotions’, in Sinnott-ArmstrongW., Moral Psychology, vol. 3, The Neuroscience of Morality: Emotion, Brain Disorders and Development, 1–17, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
76.
NewtonT., (2003), ‘Truly embodied sociology: Marrying the social and the biological?’, The Sociological Review, 51 (1): 20–42.
77.
NewtonT., (2007), Nature and Sociology, London: Routledge.
78.
NiewöhnerJ., (2011), ‘Epigenetics: Embedded bodies and the molecularisation of biography and milieu’, BioSocieties, 6 (3): 279–298.
79.
O'MalleyM., (2014), Philosophy of Microbiology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
80.
O'ReillyK., (2009), ‘For interdisciplinarity and a disciplined, professional sociology’, The European Journal of Social Science Research, 22 (2): 219–232.
81.
PaxsonH.HelmreichS., (2014), ‘The perils and promises of microbial abundance: Novel natures and model ecosystems, from artisanal cheese to alien seas’, Social Studies of Science, 44 (2): 165–193.
82.
PescosolidoB., (2006), ‘Of pride and prejudice: The role of sociology and social networks in integrating the health sciences’, Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 47: 189–208.
83.
PescosolidoB.PerryB. L.LongJ. S.MartinJ. K.NurnbergerJ. I.HesselbrockV., (2008), ‘Under the influence of genetics: How transdisciplinarity leads us to rethink social pathways to illness’, American Journal of Sociology, 114: S171–201.
84.
RabinowP., (1996), Essays on the Anthropology of Reason, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
85.
RappR., (1999), Testing Women, Testing the Fetus: The Social Impact of Amniocentesis in America, New York and London: Routledge.
RenwickC., (2012), British Sociology's Lost Biological Roots: A History of Futures Past, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
88.
RheinbergerH. J., (2010), On Historicizing Epistemology: An Essay, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
89.
RoseN., (2013), ‘The human sciences in a biological age’, Theory, Culture & Society, 30 (1): 3–34.
90.
ShillingC., (1997), ‘The undersocialized conception of the embodied agent in modern sociology’, Sociology, 31 (4): 737–754.
91.
ShillingC., (1999), ‘Towards an embodied understanding of the structure/agency relationship’, British Journal of Sociology, 4: 543–562.
92.
ShillingC., (2001), ‘The embodied foundations of social theory’, in RitzerG.SmartB. (eds), Handbook of Social Theory, 439–457, London: Sage.
93.
ShillingC., (2003), The Body and Social Theory, London: Sage.
94.
ShillingC., (2005), ‘The rise of the body and the development of sociology’, Sociology, 39 (4): 761–767.
95.
SteffenW.GrinevaldJ.CrutzenP.McNeillJ., (2011), ‘The Anthropocene: Conceptual and historical perspectives’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 369: 842–867.
96.
StotzK.GriffithsP. E., (2008), ‘Biohumanities: Rethinking the relationship between biosciences, philosophy and history of science, and society’, Quarterly Review of Biology, 83 (1): 37–45.
97.
TenHoutenW., (1997), ‘Neurosociology’, Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems, 20: 7–37.
98.
TurnerB. S., (1984), The Body and Society, Cambridge: Blackwell.
99.
WaggonerM. R.UllerT., (2015), ‘Epigenetic determinism in science and society’, New Genetics and Society, 37 (2): 177–195.
100.
WilliamsC., (2007), ‘Thinking the political in the wake of Spinoza: Power, affect, and imagination in the ethics’, Contemporary Political Theory, 6: 349–369.
101.
WilliamsS. J., (1999), ‘Is anybody there? Critical realism, chronic illness and the disability debate’, Sociology of Health & Illness, 21: 797–819.
102.
WilliamsS. J., (2004), ‘Marrying the biological and the social? A reply to Newton’, The Sociological Review, 51: 450–461.
103.
WilliamsS. J., (2011), ‘Review of Neurosociology: The nexus between neuroscience and social psychology, by Franks, D.’, British Journal of Sociology, 62 (4): 744–745.
104.
WilliamsS. J.BendelowG., (1998), The Lived Body, London: Routledge.
105.
WilliamsS. J.BirkeL.BendelowG. A. (eds), (2003), Debating Biology, London: Routledge.
106.
YoungA., (2012), ‘The social brain and the myth of empathy’, Science in Context, 25: 401–424.