This research note tests whether extraordinary high growth (e.g., sales growth rates of 500 percent to 31,000 percent over five years) is correlated to firm profitability. Using longitudinal data from three separate cohorts of Inc. 500 firms (from 1992 to 1996; 1993 to 1997; and 1994 to 1998), firm growth was operationalized in terms of sales and number of employees. Controlling for industry sector and ranking on the Inc. 500 lists, analyses found that extraordinary high growth—in terms of sales and number of employees—was not related to firm profitability. Firm age, however, was significantly, and inversely, related to profitability; younger firms experience slightly higher profitability rates. Implications for management and future study of extraordinary high–growth firms are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsJ.D. (1990).Fundamental stocks of knowledge and productivity growth.Journal of Political Economy, 98(4), 673–702.
2.
AldrichH. & AusterE.R. (1986).Even dwarfs started small: Liabilities of age and size and their strategic implications.Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 165–198.
3.
ArdishviliA., CardozoR.N., HarmonB. & VadakathS. (1998).Towards a theory of new venture growth. In P.D. Reynolds, W.D. Bygrave, N.M. Carter, S. Manigart, C.M. Mason, G.D. Meyer, & K.S. Shaver (eds.) Frontiers of entrepreneurship research. Wellesley, MA: Babson College.
4.
BakerD.D. & CullenJ.B. (1993).Administrative reorganization and configurational context: The contingent effects of age, size, and change in size.Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1251–1277.
5.
BalkinD.B., MarkmanG.D. & Gomez–MejiaL. (2000).Is CEO pay in high technology firms related to innovation?Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 1118–1129.
6.
BarrP.S. (1998).Adapting to unfamiliar environment events: A look at the evolution of interpretation and its role in strategic change.Organization Science, 9(6), 644–669.
7.
BirchD.L. (1987).Job creations in America. New York: The Free Press.
8.
BoyerK.K. (1999).Evolutionary patterns of flexible automation and performance: A longitudinal study.Management Science, 45(6), 824–842.
9.
BrushC.G. & VanderwerfP.A. (1992).A comparison of methods and sources for obtaining estimates of new venture performance.Journal of Business Venturing, 7, 157–170.
10.
BrushC.G. & ChagantiR. (1999).Businesses without glamour? An analysis of resources on performance by size and age in small service and retail firms.Journal of Business Venturing, 14(3), 233–257.
11.
CampS.M., NenideB., PricerR.W. & SextonD.L. (1999). Predicting financial performance in firm growth: Problems associated with and recommendations for using large databases. Paper presented at the Babson Entrepreneurship Research Conference, Columbia, SC: May.
12.
ChandlerG.N. & HanksS.H. (1993).Measuring the performance of emerging businesses: A validation study.Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 391–408.
13.
ChandlerG.N. & JansenE. (1992).The founder's self–assessed competence and venture performance.Journal of Business Venturing, 7, 223–236.
14.
ChristensenC.M. (1997).The Innovator's Dilemma. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.
15.
ChurchillN.C. & LewisV.L. (1983).The five stages of small business growth.Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 30–50.
16.
CovinJ.G. & SlevinD.P. (1997).High growth transitions: Theoretical perspectives and suggested directions. In D.L. Sexton and R.W. Smilor (eds.) Entrepreneurship 2000, 99–126. Chicago: Upstart Publishing Company.
17.
DavidssonP. (1991).Continued entrepreneurship: Ability, need, and opportunity as determinants of small firm growth.Journal of Business Venturing, 6(6), 405–430.
18.
DavidssonP. & DelmarF. (1997). High–Growth Firms: Characteristics, Job Contribution and Method Observations. Paper presented at RENT XI, Mannheim, Germany, November 27–28.
19.
DavidssonP. & WiklundJ. (2000).Conceptual and empirical challenges in the study of firm growth. In D. Sexton & H. Landstrom (eds.) The Blackwell Handbook of Entrepreneurship, 26–44. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
20.
DelmarF. (1997).Measuring growth: Methodological considerations and empirical results. In Donckels R. & Miettinen (eds.) Entrepreneurship and SME research: On its way to the next millennium, 199–216. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
21.
FischerM., ReuberE., HababouR. & JohnsonLee S., (1997).The role of socially constructed temporal perspectives in the Emergence of rapid growth firmsEntrepreneurship Theory and Practice22(2): 1330.
22.
GaneshJ. & KumarV. (1996).Capturing the cross–national learning effect: An analysis of an industrial technology diffusion.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24(4), 328–337.
23.
GartnerW.B. (1997).When growth is the problem, not the solution.Journal of Management Inquiry, 6(1), 62–68.
24.
GreinerL.E. (1972).Evolution and revolution as organizations grow.Harvard Business Review, 50(4): 37–46.
25.
HambrickD.C. & CrozierL.M. (1985).Stumblers and stars in the management of rapid growth.Journal of Business Venturing, 1(1), 31–45.
26.
HoyF., McDougallP.P. & D'SouzaD.E. (1992).Strategies and environments of high–growth firms. In D.L. Sexton and J.D. Kasarda (eds.) The state of the art of entrepreneurship. Boston: PWS–Kent, 341–357.
27.
KaleP., SinghH. & PerlmutterH. (2000).Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: Building relational capital.Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 217–237.
28.
KazanjianR.K. (1988).Relation of dominant problems to stages of growth in technology–based new ventures.Academy of Management Journal, 31(2), 257–279.
29.
LeeH., SmithK.G., GrimmC.M. & SchomburgA. (2000).Timing, order and durability of new product advantages with imitation.Strategic Management Journal, 21(1), 23–30.
30.
LumpkinG.T. & DessG.G. (1995).Simplicity as a strategy–making process: The effects of stage of organizational development and environment on performance.Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1386–1407.
31.
MacMillanI.C. & DayD.L. (1987).Corporate ventures into industrial markets: Dynamics of aggressive entry.Journal of Business Venturing, 2(1), 29–39.
32.
ManuF.A. (1993).Innovation, marketing and performance in European consumer markets: An exploratory investigation.Journal of Euromarketing, 2(3), 73–99.
33.
MataJ. (1994).Firm growth during infancy.Small Business Economics, 6, 27–39.
34.
MurrayA.I. (1989).Top Management Group Heterogeneity and Firm Performance.Strategic Management Journal, 10, 125–141.
35.
PenroseE. (1959).The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
36.
PorterM.E. (1985).Competitive advantage. New York: The Free Press.
37.
PorterM.E. (2001).Strategy and the Internet.Harvard Business Review, 79(3), 62–78.
38.
RiezebosJ. & GaalmanG.J.C. (1998).Time lag size in multiple operations flow shop scheduling heuristics.European Journal of Operational Research, 105(1), 72–90.
39.
SextonD.L., PricerR.W. & NenideB. (2000). Measuring performance in high growth firms. Paper presented at the Babson Entrepreneurship Research Conference, Wellesley, MA: June.
ShumanJ.C. & SeegerJ.A. (1986).The theory and practice of strategic management in smaller rapid growth firms.American Journal of Small Business, 11(1), 7–18.
42.
SmithK.G., MitchellT.R. & SummerC.E. (1985).Top level management priorities in different stages of the organizational life cycle.Academy of Management Journal, 28(4), 799–820.
43.
SpectorR. (2000).Amazon.com: Get big fast. New York: HarperBusiness.
44.
WeinzimmerL., NystromP.C. & FreemanS. (1998).Measuring organizational growth: issues, consequences and guidelines.Journal of Management, 24(2), 235–262.
45.
WeisbordE.S. (1994).Growth strategy in corporate law firms: Internal influences and performance outcomes.Journal of Managerial Issues, 6(3), 350–365.
46.
WiklundJ. (1999).The sustainability of the entrepreneurial–orientation performance relationship.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24(1), 37–48.
