Effective competitive analysis (CA) is important for success in today's marketplace. CA may be particularly important to new ventures that may lack experience in their industries and knowledge of their rivals. Using survey data from 228 new ventures, this study concludes that the formality, comprehensiveness, and user orientation of CA activities are positively associated with new venture performance. Strategic uncertainty and venture origin also significantly moderate the relationship between CA and new venture performance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BantelK.A. (1998).Technology–based “adolescent” firm configurations: Strategy identification, context, and performance.Journal of Business Venturing, 13(3), 205–230.
BarneyJ. (1991).Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage.Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–121.
4.
BaronR.M. & KennyD.A. (1986).The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.
5.
BellC. & McNamaraJ. (1991).High–tech ventures: The guide for entrepreneurial success, Reading, MA: Addison–Wesley Publishing Company.
6.
BernhardtD. (1994).Perfectly legal competitor intelligence: How to get it, use it and profit from it. Financial Times, London: Pitman Publishing.
7.
BirleyS. & WestheadP. (1994).A taxonomy of business start–up reasons and their impact on firm growth and size.Journal of Business Venturing, 9(9), 7–31.
8.
BlockZ. & MacMillanI. (1993).Corporate venturing: Creating new businesses within the firm, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
9.
BluedornA.C., JohnsonR.A., CartwrightD.K. & BarringerB.R. (1994).The interface and convergence of the strategic management and organizational environment domains.Journal of Management, 20(2), 201–262.
10.
BoydB.K., DessG.G. & RasheedA.M.A. (1993).Divergence between archival & perceptual measures of the environment.Academy of Management Review, 18, 204–226.
11.
BoydB.K. & FulkJ. (1996).Executive scanning and perceived uncertainty: A multidimensional model.Journal of Management, 22, 1–21.
12.
BrushC. (1992).Marketplace information scanning activities of new manufacturing ventures.Journal of Small Business Management, 30, 41–53.
13.
BrushC. & VanderWerfP. (1992).Comparison of methods and sources for obtaining estimates of new venture performance.Journal of Business Venturing, 7, 157–170.
14.
BurgelmanR. & SaylesL. (1986).Inside corporate innovation, New York: Free Press.
15.
ChandlerG. & HanksS. (1993).Measuring the performance of emerging businesses: A validation study.Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 391–408.
16.
ChandlerG.N. & HanksS.H. (1994).Founder competence, the environment, and venture performance.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18, 77–89.
17.
ChenM–J. (1996) Competitor analysis and inter–firm rivalry: Toward a theoretical integration.Academy of Management Review, 21, 100–134.
18.
ChrismanJ.J. & LeslieJ. (1989).Strategic, administrative, and operating problems: The impact of outsiders on firm performance.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 13(3), 37–61.
19.
CooperA. (1993).Challenges in predicting new firm performance.Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 241–253.
20.
CooperA C., WooC.Y. & DunkelbergW.C. (1989).Entrepreneurship and the initial size of firms.Journal of Business Venturing, 4(5), 317–322.
21.
CovinJ.G. & SlevinD.P. (1990).New venture strategic posture, structure, and performance: An industry life cycle analysis.Journal of Business Venturing, 5(2), 123–125.
22.
CovinJ.G., SlevinD.P. & CovinT.J. (1990).Content and performance of growth–seeking strategies: A comparison of small firms in high– and low–technology industries.Journal of Business Venturing, 5, 391–412.
23.
DaftR.L., BettenhausenK.L. & TylerB.B. (1993).Top manager's communication choices for strategic decision making: Organization design implications. In G.P. Huber and W.H. Glick (eds.)Organizational Change, Redesign, and Effectiveness, 112–146. New York: Oxford Press.
24.
DaftR.L. & LengelR.H. (1986).Organizational information requirements. Media richness and structural design.Management Science, 32, 554–571.
25.
DaftR.L., SormunenJ. & ParksD. (1988).Chief executive scanning, environmental characteristics, and company performance: An empirical study.Strategic Management Journal, 9, 123–129.
DessG.G. & RobinsonR.B.Jr. (1984).Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately–held firm and conglomerate business unit.Strategic Management Journal, 5(3), 265–273.
28.
DuncanR. (1972).Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty.Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 313–327.
29.
EisenhardtK. (1989).Making fast strategic decisions in high–velocity environments.Academy of Management Journal, 32, 543–576.
30.
ElenkovD.S. (1997).Strategic uncertainty and environmental scanning: The case for institutional influences on scanning behavior.Strategic Management Journal, 18, 287–302.
HarmonH.H. (1967).Modern factor analysis, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
37.
HittM. & IrelandR. (1984).Corporate distinctive competence and performance: Effects of perceived environmental uncertainty (PEU), size, and technology.Decision Sciences, 15, 324–349.
38.
HoferC.W. & SandbergW.R. (1987).Improving new venture performance: Some guidelines for success.American Journal of Small Management, 12(1), 11–25.
39.
HuberG.P. (1991).Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures.Organization Science, 2, 88–115.
40.
LenzR. & EngledowJ. (1988).Environmental analysis units and strategic decision–making analysis: A field study of selected ‘leading–edge’ corporations.Strategic Management Journal, 7, 69–89.
41.
McDougallP. & RobinsonR.B. (1990).New venture strategies: An empirical identification of eight archetypes of competitive strategies for entry.Strategic Management Journal, 14, 447–467.
42.
McDougallP., CovinJ., RobinsonR. & HerronL. (1994).The effects of industry growth & strategic breadth on new venture performance and strategy content.Strategic Management Journal, 15, 537–553.
43.
MillerD. & ChenM.J. (1996).The simplicity of competitive repertoires: An empirical analysis.Strategic Management Journal, 17, 419–439.
44.
MillerD. & FriesenP.H. (1983).Strategy making and environment: The third link.Strategic Management Journal, 4, 221–235.
45.
Mohan–NeillS.I. (1995).The influence of firm's age and size on its environmental scanning activities.Journal of Small Business Management, 33, 10–21.
46.
OsterS. (1994).Modern competitive analysis, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
47.
PenroseE.T. (1959).The theory of the growth of the firm, New York: Oxford University Press.
48.
PeterafM.A. (1993).The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource–based view.Strategic Management Journal, 14, 179–191.
49.
PetersM.P. & BrushC.G. (1996).Market information scanning activities and growth in new ventures: A comparison of service and manufacturing business.Journal of Business Research, 36(1), 81–89.
50.
PorterM.E. (1980).Competitive strategy, New York: Free Press.
51.
PorterM.E. (1985).Competitive advantage, New York: Free Press.
52.
PrescottJ.E. & BhardwajG. (1995).Competitive intelligence practices: A survey.Competitive Intelligence Review, June 7, 1–11.
PriemR.L. & ButlerJ.E. (2001).Is the resource–based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management Research?Academy of Management Review, 26, 22–40.
55.
PriemR.L., RasheedA.M.A. & KotulicA.G. (1995).Rationality in strategic decision processes, environmental dynamism and firm performance.Journal of Management, 21, 913–929.
56.
ReedR. & DeFillippiR.J. (1990).Casual ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage.Academy of Management Review, 15(1), 88–102.
57.
RiceG.H.Jr. & HamiltonR.E. (1979).Decision theory and the small businessman.American Journal of Small Business, 4(1), 1–9.
58.
RobinsonK.C. (1999).An examination of the influence of industry structure on eight alternative measures of new venture performance for high potential independent new ventures.Journal of Business Venturing, 14(2), 165–187.
59.
RueL.W. & IbrahimN.A. (1998).The relationship between planning sophistication and performance in small businesses. Journal of Small Business Management, 36(4), 24–32.
60.
RumeltR.P. (1991).How much does industry matter?Strategic Management Journal, 12(3), 167–175.
61.
SandbergW.R. (1986).New venture performance: The role of strategy and industry structure, Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
62.
SapienzaH.J. (1992).When do venture capitalists add value?Journal of Business Venturing, 7(1), 9–28.
63.
SawyerrO. (1993).Environmental uncertainty and environmental scanning activities of Nigerian manufacturing executives: A Comparative Analysis.Strategic Management Journal, 14, 287–299.
64.
SchwenkC.R. & ShraderC.B. (1993).Effects of formal strategic planning on financial performance in small firms: A meta–analysis.Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 17(3), 53–64.
65.
ShanW. (1990).An empirical analysis of organizational strategies by entrepreneurial high–technology firms.Strategic Management Journal, 11(2), 129–139.
66.
SharfmanM.P. & DeanJ.W.Jr. (1991).Conceptualizing and measuring the organizational environment: A multidimensional approach.Journal of Management, 17, 681–700.
67.
SmithK.G., GannonM.J. & SapienzaH. (1989).Selecting methodologies for entrepreneurial research: Tradeoffs and guidelines.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 14(1), 39–50.
68.
SmithK.G., GrimmC.M. & GannonM.J. (1992).Dynamics of competitive strategy, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
69.
StoneM.M. & BrushC.G. (1996).Planning in ambiguous contexts: The dilemma of meeting needs for commitment and demands for legitimacy.Strategic Management Journal, 17, 633–652.
70.
StuartR. & AbettiP. (1987).Start–up ventures: Towards the prediction of early success.Journal of Business Venturing, 2, 151–230.
71.
SubramanianR. & IshakS.T. (1998).Competitor analysis practices of US companies: An empirical investigation.Management International Review, 38(1), 7–23.
72.
SuttonH. (1988).Competitive intelligence. New York: The Conference Board, Report No. 913.
73.
TeeceJ.D. (1991).Dynamic capabilities and strategic management.Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509–533.
74.
TsaiW.M–H., MacMillanI.C. & LowM.B. (1991).Effects of strategy and environment on corporate venture success in industrial markets.Journal of Business Venturing, 6, 9–28.
75.
VellaC.M. & McGonagleJ.Jr. (1988).Improved business planning using competitive intelligence, New York: Quorum Books.
76.
Yasai–ArdekaniM. & NystromP.C. (1996).Designs for environmental scanning systems: Tests of a contingency theory.Management Science, 42, 187–204.
ZahraS.A. (1996a).Goverance, ownership, and corporate entrepreneurship: The moderating impact of industry technological opportunities.Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1713–1735.
79.
ZahraS.A. (1996b).Technology strategy and new venture performance: A study of corporate sponsored and independent biotechnology ventures.Journal of Business Venturing, 11(4), 289–321.
80.
ZahraS.A. (1996c).Technology strategy and financial performance: Examining the moderating role of the firm's competitive environment.Journal of Business Venturing, 11(3), 189–219.
81.
ZahraS.A. & BognerW.C. (2000).Technology strategy and software new ventures’ performance: Exploring the moderating effect of the competitive environment. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(2), 135–173.
82.
ZahraS. & ChaplesS. (1993).Blind spots in competitive analysis.Academy of Management Executive, 7(2), 7–28.
83.
ZajacE.J. & BazermanM.H. (1991).Blind spots in industry and competitor analysis: Implications of interfirm (mis)perception for strategic decisions.Academy of Management Review, 16, 37–56.
