In this commentary, the received definitions of kin–based business are expanded in a way that allows application of the concept to a wider variety of cultures. Three types of kin–based enterprise are discussed: blood and marriage, spiritual, and community–based enterprises.
DupuisJ. (1994). International research in the domain of family business: Theoretical and methodological problems. International Sociological Association.
3.
GeertzG. (1963).Peddlers and princes: Social change and economic modernization in two Indonesian towns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
GranovetterM.S. (1985).Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.
5.
HittM. (2001). Commentary presented at Theories Of Family Enterprise: Establishing A Paradigm For The Field. Edmonton, Alberta; September 27–28, 2001.
6.
International Labour Organization (2001). Annual Report 2001, Geneva, Switzerland.
7.
JohannissonB. & MonstedM. (1997).Contextualizing entrepreneurial networking. International Studies of Management and Organizations, 27(3), 109–136.
8.
MooreM. (1997).Societies, polities and capitalists in developing countries: A literature survey. The Journal of Developmental Studies, 33(3), 287–363.
9.
PeredoA.M. (1989). Ritual, credit and social networks in Anccaca indigenous community. Unpublished paper, Catholic University of Peru.
10.
PeredoA.M. (2001). Communal enterprises, sustainable development and the alleviation of poverty in rural Andean communities. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Calgary, Calgary.
11.
SwedbergR. (1997).New economic sociology: What has been accomplished, what is ahead?Acta Sociologica, 40(2), 161–182.
12.
ZhaoL. & AramJ. (1995).Networking and growth of young technology–intensive ventures in China. Journal of Business Venturing, 10, 349–370.
