Few studies in the mainstream management literature have included the family as a variable. The focus of this article is to describe (1) why there is a dearth of research using family as a variable; (2) how failing to use the family as a variable in organizational research can lead to incomplete or misleading findings; (3) the issues and concerns related to using the family as a variable in organizational research; and (4) options in research design for using the family as a variable. Given that the vast majority of organizations can be classified as “family firms,” including the family as a variable in research designs will provide researchers with theories that are more robust and that can be generalized to a larger population of organizations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AstrachanJ.H. & KolenkoT.A. (1994).A neglected factor explaining family business success: Human resource practices. Family Business Review, 7(3), 251–262.
2.
BirleyS. (2001).Owner–manager attitudes to family and business issues: A 16 country study. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 26(2), 63–76.
3.
BoydJ., UptonN. & WircenskiM. (1999). Mentoring in family firms: A reflective analysis of senior executives’ perceptions. Family Business Review, 12(4), 299–309.
4.
BurtR.S. (1992).Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
CarlockR.S. & WardJ.L. (2001).Strategic planning for family business: Parallel planning to unify the family and the business. New York: Palgrave.
6.
CummingsT.G. & WorleyC.G. (2001).Organization development and change, 7th ed. Cincinnati, OH: South–Western.
7.
DavisJ.A. & TagiuriR. (1989).The influence of life stage on father–son work relationships in family companies. Family Business Review, 2(1), 47–74.
8.
DumasC. (1989).Understanding father–daughter and father–son dyads in family–owned businesses. Family Business Review, 2(1), 31–46.
9.
DyerW.G., Jr., (1986).Cultural change in family firms. San Francisco: Jossey–Bass.
10.
DyerW.G., Jr., (1988).Culture and continuity in family firms. Family Business Review, 1(1), 37–50.
11.
DyerW.G., Jr., (1992).The entrepreneurial experience. San Francisco: Jossey–Bass.
12.
DyerW.G., Jr., (1994).Toward a theory of entrepreneurial careers. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 19(2), 7–21.
13.
DyerW.G. Jr. & HandlerW. (1994).Entrepreneurship and family business: Exploring the connections. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 19(1), 71–83.
FamaE. & JensenM.C. (1983).Agency problems and residual claims. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 325–344.
16.
FilbeckG. & SmithL.L. (1997).Team building and conflict management strategies for family businesses. Family Business Review, 10(4), 339–352.
17.
FukuyamaF. (1995).Trust. New York: Free Press.
18.
GersickK.E., LansbergI., DesjardinsM. & DunnB. (1999).Stages and transitions: Managing change in the family business. Family Business Review, 12(4), 287–297.
19.
Gomez–MejiaL.R., BalkinD.B. & CardyR.L. (1998).Managing human resources, 2nd ed. Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice–Hall.
20.
Gomez–MejiaL.R., Nuñez–NickelM. & GutierrezI. (2001).The role of family ties in agency contracts. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 81–95.
21.
GranovetterM.S. (1973).The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.
22.
GranovetterM.S. (1985).Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510.
23.
HabbershonT.G. & WilliamsM.L. (1999).A resource–based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review, 12(1), 1–25.
24.
HandlerW.C. (1994).Succession in family business: A review of the research. Family Business Review, 7(2), 133–157.
25.
HandlerW.C. & KramK.E. (1988).Succession in family firms: The problem of resistance. Family Business Review, 1(4), 361–381.
26.
HarrisR., MartinezJ. & WardJ.L. (1994).Is strategy different for the family–owned business?Family Business Review, 7(2), 159–174.
27.
HarveyD. & BrownD.R. (2001).An experiential approach to organization development, 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice–Hall.
28.
HaynesJ.M. & UsdinT.M. (1997).Resolving family business disputes through mediation. Family Business Review, 10(2), 115–121.
29.
Hilburt–DavisJ. & DyerW.G.Jr. (2003) Consulting to family businesses: A practical guide to contracting, assessment, and implementation. New York: Wiley.
HodgeB.J., AnthonyW.P. & GalesL.M. (1996).Organization theory, 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice–Hall.
32.
HollanderB.S. & ElmanN.S. (1988).Family–owned businesses: An emerging field of inquiry. Family Business Review, 1(2), 145–164.
33.
JensenM. & MecklingO. (1976).Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and Ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(2), 305–360.
34.
KahnJ.A. & HendersonD.A. (1992).Location preferences of family firms: Strategic decision of “home sweet home”? Family Business Review, 5(3), 271–282.
35.
KaslowF.W. (1998).Handling transitions from mother to son in the family business: The knotty issues. Family Business Review, 11(3), 229–238.
36.
KayeK. (1991).Penetrating the cycle of sustained conflict. Family Business Review, 4(1), 21–44.
37.
KayeK. (1992).The kid brother. Family Business Review, 5(3), 237–256.
38.
KayeK. (1996).When the family business is sickness. Family Business Review, 9(4), 347–368.
39.
KuhnT.S. (1970).The structure of scientific revolutions, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40.
KuratkoD.F. & HodgettsR.M. (1998).Entrepreneurship: A contemporary approach, 4th ed. Fort Worth, TX: Dryden Press.
41.
LambingP. & KuehlC.R. (2000).Entrepreneurship, 2nd ed. Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice–Hall.
42.
LaneS.H. (1989).An organizational development/team–building approach to consultation with family businesses. Family Business Review, 2(1), 5–16.
43.
LansbergI. (1988).The succession conspiracy. Family Business Review, 1(2), 119–144.
44.
LansbergI. (1999).Succeeding generations. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
45.
LansbergI., PerrowE.L. & RogolskyS. (1988).Family business as an emerging field. Family Business Review, 1(1), 1–8.
46.
LitzR.A. (1997).The family firm's exclusion from business school research: Explaining the void; addressing the opportunity. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 21(3), 55–71.
47.
LundbergC.C. (1994).Unraveling communications among family members. Family Business Review, 7(1), 29–37.
48.
LymanA.R. (1991).Customer service: Does family ownership make a difference?Family Business Review, 4(3), 303–324.
McCollomM.E. (1988).Integration in the family firm: When the family system replaces controls and culture. Family Business Review, 1(4), 399–417.
51.
McConaughyD.L. (2000).Family CEOs vs. nonfamily CEOs in the family controlled firm: An examination of the level and sensitivity of Pay to Performance. Family Business Review, 13(2), 131–19.
52.
McConaughyD L., WalkerM., HendersonG. & MishraC. (1998).Founding family controlled firms: Efficiency and value. Review of Financial Economics, 7(1), 1–19.
53.
MendozaD. & KroneS. (1997).An interview with Judy Barber: Prenuptial agreements, intimacy, trust and control. Family Business Review, 10(2), 173–178.
54.
MintzbergH. (1990).Postscript. Family Business Review, 3(3), 314–315.
55.
MintzbergH. & WatersJ.A. (1982).Tracking strategy in an entrepreneurial firm. Academy of Management Journal, 25(3), 465–499.
56.
MishraC.S. & McConaughyD.L. (1999).Founding family control and capital structure: The risk of loss of control and the aversion to debt. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 23(4), 53–64.
57.
PerrowC. (1972).Complex organizations. Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman, and Company.
58.
PozaE., JohnsonS. & AlfredT. (1998).Changing the family business through action research. Family Business Review, 11(4), 311–323.
59.
PrinceR.A. (1990).Family business mediation: A conflict resolution model. Family Business Review, 3(3), 209–223.
60.
RobbinsS.P. (2001).Organizational behavior, 9th ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice–Hall.
61.
RogalK.H. (1989).Obligation or opportunity: How can could–be heirs assess their position?Family Business Review, 2(3), 237–255.
62.
SchermerhornJ.R., HuntJ.G. & OsbornR.N. (2000).Organizational behavior, 7th ed. New York: John Wiley.
63.
SchulzeW.G., LubatkinM.H., DinoR.N. & BuchholtzA.K. (2001).Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12(2), 99–116.
64.
SeibertS.E., KraimerM.L. & LidenR.C. (2001).A social capital theory of career success. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 219–237.
65.
ShankerM.C. & AstrachanJ.H. (1996). Myths and realities: Family businesses’ contribution to the U.S. economy. Family Business Review, 9(2), 107–119.
66.
SharmaP., ChrismanJ.J. & ChuaJ.H. (1997).Strategic management of the family business: Past research and future challenges. Family Business Review, 10(1), 1–35.
67.
StavrouE.T. & SwierzP.A. (1998).Securing the future of the family enterprise: A model of offspring intentions to join the business. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 23(2), 19–39.
68.
SteierL. (2001).Next–generation entrepreneurs and succession: An exploratory study of modes and means of managing social capital. Family Business Review, 14(3), 259–276.
69.
SwartzM.A. & BarnesL.B. (1991) Outsides boards and family business: Another look. Family Business Review, 4(3), 269–285.
70.
TagiuriR. & DavisJ.A. (1992).On the goals of successful family companies. Family Business Review, 5(1), 43–62.
71.
ThompsonA.A. & StricklandA.J. (2001).Strategic management: Concepts and cases, 12th ed. New York: McGraw–Hill.
72.
WardJ.L. (1987).Keeping the family business healthy. San Francisco: Jossey–Bass.
73.
WardJ.L. (1988).The special role of strategic planning for family businesses. Family Business Review, 1(2), 105–118.
74.
WestheadP. & CowlingM. (1998).Family firm research: The need for a methodological rethink. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 23(1), 31–56.
75.
WongB., McReynoldsB.S. & WongW. (1992).Chinese family firms in the San Francisco Bay area. Family Business Review, 5(4), 355–372.
