Stereotypes,Archetypes,and Prototypes: Three Uses of Superlatives in Contemporary Urban Studies

Abu‐Lughod J. 1999. New York, Chicago, Los Angeles: America's Global Cities. Minneapolis , MN : University of Minnesota Press.

Arendt H. 1982. Lectures on Kant's Political Philosophy. Chicago , IL : University of Chicago Press.

Beall J. Crankshaw O. Parnall S. 2002. Uniting a Divided City: Governance and Social Exclusion in Johannesburg. London : Earthscan Publications.

Benjamin W. 1978. Illuminations. New York : Schocken Books.

Bourdieu P. 1985. Distinction: Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. Cambridge , MA : Harvard University Press.

Burgess R. 1925 1967. “ The Growth of the City: An Introduction to a Research Project,”in R. Park, E. Burgess 1, and R. McKenzie 1, The City, pp.47–62. Chicago , IL : University of Chicago Press.

Dear M. 2000. The Postmodern Urban Condition. Oxford : Blackwell.

Dear M. (ed.).2002a. From Chicago to L.A. Making Sense of Urban Theory. Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage.

Dear M. 2002b. “Los Angeles and the Chicago School: Invitation to a Debate,” City & Community 1(1),5–32.

Dear M. Flusty S. 1998. “Postmodern Urbanism,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 88(1),50–72.

Erlich B. Dreier P. 1999. “ The New Boston Discovers the Old Tourism and the Struggle for a Livable City,”in D. R. Judd 1and S. Fainstein 1(eds.), The Tourist City, pp.155–178. New Haven , CT : Yale University Press.

Friedmann J. 1995. “ Where We Stand: A Decade of World City Research,”in P. Knox 1and P. Taylor 1(eds.), World Cities in a World‐System,p.21–47. New York : Cambridge University Press.

Garreau J. 1991. Edge City. New York : Doubleday.

Gottdiener M. 2002. “ Urban Analysis as Merchandizing: The ‘LA School’ and the Understanding of Metropolitan Development,”in J. Eade 1and C. Mele 1(eds.), Understanding the City, pp.159–180. Oxford : Blackwell.

Gottdiener M. Collins C. C. Dickens D. R. 1999. Las Vegas: The Social Production of an All‐American City. Malden , MA : Blackwell.

Gottdiener M. Kephart G. 1991. “ A Multinucleated Metropolitan Region: A Comparative Analysis,”in R. Kling 1(eds.), Postsuburban California, pp.31–54. Berkeley , CA : University of California Press.

Marcuse P. Van Kempen R. (eds.).2002. Globalizing Cities. Boston/Oxford : Blackwell.

Nijman J. 1997. “ Globalization to a Latin Beat: The Miami Growth Machine,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 551,164–177.

Nijman J. 2000. “The Paradigmatic City,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 90(1),135–145.

Park R. Burgess E. McKenzie R. (eds.).1925 1967. The City. Chicago , IL : University of Chicago Press.

Scott A. J. (ed.).2001. Global City Regions. New York/London : Oxford University Press.

Scott A. J. Soja E. 1986. “Los Angeles: Capital of the Late 20th Century,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 4,249–254.

Scott A. J. Soja E. (eds.).1996. The City: Los Angeles and Urban Theory at the End of the Twentieth Century. Berkeley , CA : University of California Press.

Soja E. 1989. Postmodern Geographies. London : Verso.

Soja E. 1992. “ The Stimulus of a Little Confusion: A Contemporary Comparison of Amsterdam and Los Angeles,”in M. P. Smith 1(ed.), After Modernism: Global Restructuring and the Changing Boundaries of City Life, pp.17–38. New Brunswick , NJ : Transaction Publishers.

Soja E. 1996. Thirdspace. Cambridge , MA : Blackwell.

Soja E. 2000. Postmetropolis. Cambridge , MA : Blackwell.

Weinstein R. 1996. “ The First American City,”in A. J. Scott 1and E. Soja 1(eds.), The City: Los Angeles and Urban Theory at the End of the Twentieth Century, pp.22–46. Berkeley , CA : University of California Press.