Children with spelling deficits demonstrate significant difficulty using inflectional morphology in their writing. This study investigated whether phonological deficits account for these pronounced difficulties or if they are more accurately explained by limitations in morphological or orthographic awareness. Twenty–six 11—13–year–old children with spelling deficits, 31 younger spelling–level–matched children, and 31 age–matched children were asked to spell a series of verbs with past tense and progressive markers in dictated sentences and in list form. Performance on spelling tasks was compared to performance on phonological, morphological, and orthographic awareness tasks. Results suggest that children with spelling deficits have significant difficulty including inflections as well as spelling inflections and base words. Difficulty was most pronounced in a sentence context. Ability to spell inflectional forms was related to variation in morphological awareness in children with spelling deficits and to variation in orthographic awareness in spelling–level–matched children.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllalL. (1997). Learning to spell in the classroom. In PerfettiC. A., RiebenL., & FayolM. (eds.), Learning to spell (pp. 129–150). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
ArnbakE., & ElbroC. (2000). The effects of morphological awareness training on the reading and spelling skills of young dyslexics. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 44(3), 229–251.
3.
BeersC. S., & BeersJ. W. (1992). Children's spelling of English inflection morphology. In TempletonS. & BearD. R. (eds.), Development of orthographic knowledge and the foundations of literacy: A memorial festchrift for Edmund H. Henderson (pp. 231–252). Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
BerkoJ. (1958). The child's learning of English morphology. Word, 14, 150–177.
5.
BruckM. (1993). Component spelling skills of college students with childhood dyslexia. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 16, 171–184.
6.
BruckM., & TreimanR. (1990). Phonological awareness and spelling in normal children and dyslexics: The case of initial consonant clusters. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 50, 156–178.
7.
BryantP. E., NunesT., & BindmanM. (1997). Children's understanding of the connection between grammar and spelling. In BlachmanB. A. (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia (pp. 219–240). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
BryantP., NunesT., & BindmanM. (1998). Awareness of language in children who have reading difficulties: Historical comparisons in a longitudinal study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39(4), 501–510.
9.
CarlisleJ. (1987). The use of morphological knowledge in spelling derived forms by learning–disabled and normal students. Annals of Dyslexia, 37, 90–108.
10.
CarlisleJ. (1988). Knowledge of derivational morphology and spelling ability in fourth, sixth, and eighth graders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 247–266.
11.
CarlisleJ. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. In FeldmanL. (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 189–209). Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
CarlisleJ. (1996). An exploratory study of morphological errors in children's written stories. Reading and Writing, 8(1), 61–72.
13.
CarrollJ. B., DaviesP., & RichmanB. (1971). Word frequency book. New York : Harper & Row.
14.
CattsH. W., FeyM. E., ZhangX., & TomblinJ. B. (1999). Language basis of reading and reading disabilities: Evidence from longitudinal investigation. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(3), 331–361.
15.
DeaconS. H., & BryantP. E. (2001). Children's use of base words to spell derived and inflected words: Beyond phonological and orthographic similarity. Poster presented at Scientific Studies in Reading. Boulder, CO.
16.
DerwingB. L., SmithM. L., & WiebeG. (1995). On the role of spelling in morpheme recognition: Experimental studies with children and adults. In FeldmanL. (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 3–28). Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
DunnL., & DunnL. (1997). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test–III. Circle Pines, MN : American Guidance Service.
18.
ElbroC. (1989). Morphological awareness in dyslexia. In von EulerC. (Ed.), Wenner–Gren international symposium series: Brain and reading. Hampshire, England : Macmillan.
19.
FischerF. W., ShankweilerD., & LibermanI. Y. (1985). Spelling proficiency and sensitivity to word structure. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 282–295.
20.
FowlerA. E., & LibermanI. Y. (1995). The role of phonology and orthography in morphological awareness. In FeldmanL. (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 189–209). Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
GrahamS. (2000). Should the natural learning approach replace spelling instruction?Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 235–247.
22.
JoanisseM., ManisF., KeetingP., & SeidenbergM. (2000). Language deficits in dyslexic children: Speech perception, phonology, and morphology. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 30–60.
23.
KibelM., & MilesT. R. (1994). Phonological errors in the spelling of taught dyslexic children. In HulmeC. & SnowlingM. (eds.), Reading development and dyslexia (pp. 105–127). London : Whurr.
24.
LennoxC., & SiegalL. (1998). Phonological and orthographic processes in good and poor spellers. In HulmeC. & JoshiR. M. (eds.), Reading and spelling development and disorders (pp. 395–404). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
LeonardL. (1998). Children with specific language impairment. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
26.
LeongC. K. (1999). Phonological coding and children's spelling. Annals of Dyslexia, 49, 195–220.
27.
MahonyD., SingsonM., & MannV. (2000). Reading ability and sensitivity to morphological relations. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 191–218.
28.
MarchmanV., WulfeckB., & WeismerS. E. (1999). Morphological productivity in children with normal language and SLI: A study of English past tense. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing, 42(1), 206–220.
29.
MorrisR. D., StuebingK. K., FletcherJ. M., ShaywitzS. E., LyonR. G., ShankweilerD. P., . (1998). Subtypes of reading disability: Variability around a phonological core. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 347–373.
30.
NunesT., BryantP., & BindmanM. (1997a). Spelling and grammar—The necsed move. In PerfettiC. A., RiebanL., & FayolM. (eds.), Learning to spell (pp. 151–170). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
PenningtonB. F., McCabeL. L., SmithS. D., LeflyD. L., BookmanM. O., KimberlingW. H., . (1986). Spelling errors in adults with a form of familial dyslexia. Child Development, 57(4), 1001–1113.
33.
RiceM., WexlerK., & CleaveP. (1995). Specific language impairment as a period of extended optional infinitive. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 850–863.
34.
RiceM., WexlerK., MarguisJ., & HershbergerS. (2000). Acquisition of irregular past tense by children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 43(5), 1126–1146.
35.
RubinH. (1988). Morphological knowledge and early writing ability. Language and Speech, 31, 337–355.
36.
RubinH., PattersonP. A., & KantorM. (1991). Morphological development and writing ability in children and adults. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 22, 228–235.
37.
SawyerD. J., WadeS., & KimJ. K. (1999). Spelling error as a window on variations in phonological deficits among children with dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 49, 137–159.
38.
ScottC. (2002). A fork in the road less traveled: Writing intervention based on language profile. In ButlerK. & SillimanE. (eds.), Speaking, reading and writing in children with language learning disabilities. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
39.
SénéchalM. (2000). Morphological effects in children's spelling of French words. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54(2), 76–85.
40.
ShankweilerD., CrainS., KateL., FowlerA. E., LibermanA. M., BradyS. A., . (1995). Cognitive profiles of reading–disabled children: Comparisons of language skills in phonology, morphology, and syntax. Psychological Science, 6, 149–156.
41.
SiegalL. S. (1998). Phonological processing deficits and reading disabilities. In MetsalaJ. & EhriL. (eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 141–160). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
42.
SiegalL. S., ShareD., & GevaE. (1995). Evidence for superior orthographic skills in dyslexics. Psychological Science, 6(4), 250–254.
43.
SingsonM., MahoneyD., & MannV. (2000). The relationship between reading ability and morphological skills: Evidence from derivational suffixes. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 219–253.
44.
Smith–LockK. M. (1991). Errors of inflection in the writing of normal and poor readers. Language and Speech, 34(4), 341–350.
45.
TorgesenJ. K., WagnerR. K., RashotteC. A., RoseE., LindamoodP., ConwayT., & GarvanC. (1999). Preventing reading failure in young children with phonological processing disabilities: Group and individual responses to instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 579–593.
46.
TreimanR. (1993). Beginning to spell: A study of first–grade children. New York : Oxford University Press.
47.
TreimanR. (1997). Spelling in normal children and dyslexics. In BlachmanB. A. (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention (pp. 191–218). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
48.
TreimanR., & BourassaD. C. (2000). The development in spelling skill. Topics in Language Disorders, 20(3), 1–8.
49.
TreimanR., & CassarM. (1996). Effects of morphology on children's spelling of final consonant clusters. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63(1), 141–170.
50.
TreimanR., & CassarM. (1997). Spelling acquisition in English. In PerfettiC., RiebanL., & FayolM. (eds.), Learning to spell: Research, theory, and practice across the languages (pp. 61–80). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
51.
TreimanR., CassarM., & ZukowskiA. (1994). What types of linguistic information do children use in spelling? The case of flaps. Child Development, 65, 1310–1329.
52.
WagnerR., TorgesenJ., & RashotteC. A. (1999). Comprehensive test of phonological processing. Austin, TX : Pro–ED.
53.
WindsorJ. (2000). The role of phonological opacity in reading achievement. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 50–61.
54.
WindsorJ., ScottC., & StreetR. (2000). Verb and noun morphology in the spoken and written language of children with language learning disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 1322–1336.
55.
WilkinsonG. (1993). Wide Range Achievement Test 3. Wilmington, DE : Wide Range, Inc.
56.
WorthyJ., & ViiseN. M. (1996). Morphological, phonological, and orthographic differences between the spelling of normally achieving children and basic literacy adults. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 8(1), 139–159.
