AchillesC. (1999). Let's Put Kids First, Finally: Getting Class Size Right. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
2.
AkerhielmK. (1995). Does class size matter?Economics of Education Review, 14, 229-241.
3.
AngristJ.LevyV. (1999). Using Maimondides' Rule to estimate the effect of class size on scholastic achievement. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 533-575.
4.
ArgysL.M.ReesD.I.BrewerD.J. (1996). Detracking America's schools: Equity at zero cost?Journal of Policy Analyis and Management, 15, 623-645.
5.
BallouD.PodgurskyM. (1997). Teacher Pay and Teacher Quality (chap. 4) Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
6.
BarrR. (1975). How children are taught to read: Grouping and pacing. School Review, 84, 479-498.
7.
BarrR. (1987). Classroom interaction and curricular content. In BloomeD. (Ed.), Literacy and Schooling (pp. 150-168). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
8.
BarrR.DreebenR. (1983). How Schools Work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
BarrR.SadowM. (1989). Influence of basal programs on fourth-grade reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 44-71.
10.
BeatonA.E.MullisI.V.S.MartinM.O.GonzalezE.J.KellyD.L. (1996). Mathematics Achievement in the Middle School Years: IEA's Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
11.
Berrueta-ClementJ.SchweinhartL.BarnettW.EpsteinA.WeikartD. (1984). Changed Lives: The Effects of the Perry Preschool Program on Youths Through Age 19. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Publishers.
12.
BettsJ. (1995). Does school quality matter: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. Review of Economics and Statistics, 77, 231-250.
13.
BettsJ. (1996). Is there a link between school inputs and earnings? Fresh scrutiny of an old literature. In BurtlessG. (Ed.), Does Money Matter? The Effect of School Resources on Student Achievement and Adult Success (pp. 141-191). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
14.
BettsJ.R.ShkolnikJ.L. (1999). The behavioral effects of variations in class size: The case of math teachers. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 193-215.
15.
BishopJ.J. (1998). The effect of curriculum-based external exit exam systems on student achievement. Journal of Economic Education, 29, 171-182.
16.
BohrnstedtG.W.StecherB.M., (Eds.) (1999). Class Size Reduction in California: Early Evaluation Findings, 1996-98. Palo Alto, CA: American Institutes for Research.
17.
BokD. (1993). The Cost of Talent (pp. 141-191). New York: The Free Press.
18.
BourkeS. (1986). How small is better: Some relationships between class size, teaching practices, and student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 558-571.
19.
BowlesS.LevinH. (1968). The determinants of school achievement: An appraisal of some recent evidence. Journal of Human Resources, 3, 3-24.
20.
BrewerD.J.KropC.GillB.P.ReichardtR. (1999). Estimating the cost of national class size reductions under different policy alternatives. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 179-192.
21.
BrykA.S.RaudenbushS.W. (1992). Hierarchical Linear Models for Social and Behavioural Research: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
22.
CahenL.S.FilbyN.McCutcheonG.KyleD.W. (1983). Class Size and Instruction. New York: Longman.
23.
CainG.WattsH. (1970). Problems in making policy inferences from the Coleman report. American Sociological Review, 35, 228-242.
24.
CampbellD.T.StanleyJ.C. (1966). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
25.
CampbellR.HomboC.M.MazzeoJ. (2000). NAEP 1999 Trends in Academic Progress: Three Decades of Student Performance. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
26.
CardD.KruegerA.B. (1992). Does school quality matter? Returns to education and the characteristics of public schools in the United States. Journal of Political Economy, 100, 1-40.
27.
CardD.KruegerA.B. (1996). Labor market effects of school quality: Theory and evidence. In BurtlessG. (Ed.), Does Money Matter? The Effect of School Resources on Student Achievement and Adult Success (pp. 97-141). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
28.
CaseA.YogiM. (1999). Does school quality matter? Returns to education and the characteristics of school in South Africa. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper W7399.
29.
ColemanJ.S. (1966). Equality of Educational Opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
30.
CookT.D.CampbellD.T. (1979). Design and Analysis for Field Settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.
CSR Research Consortium. (1999). Class Size Reduction in California 1996-98: Early Findings Signal Promise and Concerns. Palo Alto, CA: CSR Research Consortium.
33.
CynaderM.S.FrostB.J. (1999). Mechanisms of brain development: Neuronal sculpting by the physical and social environment. In KeatingD.P.HertzmanC. (Eds.), Developmental Health and the Wealth of Nations (chap. 8). New York: The Guilford Press.
34.
DreebenR. (1970). The Nature of Teaching: Schools and the Work of Teachers. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
35.
Educational Research Services. (1978). Class Size: A Summary of Research. Arlington, VA: Educational Research Services.
36.
Educational Research Services. (1980). Class Size Research: A Critique of Recent Meta-Analyses. Arlington, VA: Educational Research Services.
37.
EhrenbergR.G.BrewerD.J. (1995). Did teachers' verbal ability and race matter in the 1960s? Coleman revisited. Economics of Education Review, 14, 1-21, 291-299.
38.
EhrenbergR.G.ChaykowksiR.P.EhrenbergR.A. (1988). Determinants of the compensation and mobility of school superintendents. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 41, 386-401.
39.
EhrenbergR.G.EhrenbergR.A.ReesD.EhrenbergE.L. (1991). School district leave policies, teacher absenteeism, and student achievement. Journal of Human Resources, 26, 72-105.
40.
EhrenbergR.G.GoldhaberD.BrewerD.J. (1995). Did teachers race, gender, and ethnicity matter: Evidence from NEL888. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48, 547-561.
41.
EvertsonC.M.RandolphC.H. (1989). Teaching practices and class size: A new look at an old issue. Peabody Journal of Education, 67, 85-105.
42.
FergusonR.F. (1991). Paying for public education: New evidence on how and why money matters. Harvard Journal of Legislation, 28, 465-497.
43.
FergusonR.F.LaddH.F. (1996). How and why money matters: An analysis of Alabama schools. In LaddH.F. (Ed.), Holding Schools Accountable: Performance Based Reform in Education (pp. 265-298). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
44.
FinnJ.D.FultonD.ZahariasJ.NyeB.A. (1989). Carry-over effects of small classes. Peabody Journal of Education, 67, 75-84.
45.
FinnJ.D.GerberS.B.AchillesC.M.Boyd-ZahariasJ.The enduring effects of small classes. Teachers College Record., In press.
46.
FinnJ.P.AchillesC.M. (1990). Answers and questions about class size: A statewide experiment. American Education Research Journal, 27, 557-577.
47.
FinnJ.P.AchillesC.M. (1999). Tennessee's class size study: Findings, implications and misconceptions. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 97-110.
48.
FirestoneW.A.MayrowetzD.FairmanJ. (1998). Performance based assessment and instructional change: The effect of testing in Maine and Maryland. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20, 95-113.
49.
FrempongG.WillmsJ.D.The importance of quality schools. In WillmsJ. D. (Ed.), Vulnerable Children: Findings from Canada's National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth. Edmonton: University of Alberta Press., In press.
50.
GamoranA.NystrandM.BerendsM.LePoreP.C. (1995). An organizational analysis of the effects of ability grouping. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 687-715.
51.
GlassG.V.CahenL.S.SmithM.L.FilbyN.N. (1982). School Class Size: Research and Policy. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
52.
GlassG.V.SmithM.L. (1979). Meta-analysis of research on class size and achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1, 2-16.
53.
GoldhaberD.D.BrewerD.J. (1997). Why don't schools and teachers seem to matter? Assessing the impact of unobservables on educational productivity. Journal of Human Resources, 32, 505-523.
GoldsteinH.BlatchfordP. (1998). Class size and educational achievement: A review of methodology with special reference to study design. British Educational Research Journal, 24, 255-268.
56.
GoodladJ.I. (1984). A Place Called School. New York: McGraw-Hill.
57.
GrissmerD. (1999). Conclusions: Class size effects: Assessing the evidence, its policy implications and future research agenda. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 179-192.
58.
GrissmerD., (1994). Student Achievement and the Changing American Family. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
59.
HabermanM.LarsonR. (1968). Would cutting class size change instruction?The National Elementary Principal, 47, 18-19.
60.
HanushekE. (1986). The economics of schooling: Production and efficiency in public schools. Journal of Economic Literature, 24, 1141-1177.
61.
HanushekE. (1989). The impact of differential expenditures on school performance. Educational Research, 18, 45-51.
62.
HanushekE. (1996). School resources and student performance. In BurtlessG. (Ed.), Does Money Matter? The Effect of School Resources on Student Achievement and Adult Success. (pp. 74-92). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
63.
HanushekE. (1997). Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: An update. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 141-164.
64.
HanushekE. (1999a). The evidence on class size. In MayerS.PetersonP. (Eds.), Earning and Learning: How Schools Matter (pp. 131-168). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
65.
HanushekE.A. (1999b). Some findings from an independent investigation of the Tennessee STAR experiment and from other investigations of class size effects. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 143-164.
66.
HanushekE.A.KainJ.F.RivkinS.G. (1998). Teacher, schools and academic achievement. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper 6691.
67.
HanushekE.A.KainJ.F.RivkinS.G. (1999). Do higher salaries buy better teachers?National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 7082.
68.
HanushekE.A.RivkinS.G. (1997). Understanding the twentieth-century growth in school spending. Journal of Human Resources, Winter, 1997, 35-68.
69.
HargreavesL.GaltonM.PellA. (1997). The effects of major changes in class size on teacher-pupil interaction in elementary school classes in England: Does research merely confirm the obvious?Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
70.
HargreavesL.GaltonM.PellA. (1998). The effects of changes in class size on teacher-pupil interaction. International Journal of Educational Research, 29, 779-795.
71.
HeckmanJ.Layne-FarrarA.PetraT. (1996). Does measured school quality really matter? An examination of the earnings-quality relationship. In BurtlessG. (Ed.), Does Money Matter? The Effect of School Resources on Student Achievement and Adult Success (pp. 192-289). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
72.
HedgesL.V.GreenwaldR. (1996). Have times changed? The relationship between school resources and student performance. In BurtlessG. (Ed.), Does Money Matter? The Effect of School Resources on Student Achievement and Adult Success (pp. 41-92). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
73.
HedgesL.LaineR.GreenwaldR. (1994). Does money matter: A meta-analysis of studies of differential schooling spending on school performance. Educational Researcher, 23, 5-14.
74.
HedgesL.V.OlkinI. (1985). Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
75.
HoxbyC. (1998). The effects of class size and composition on students' achievement: New evidence from natural population variation. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 6869.
76.
HoxbyC. (2000). The effects of class size and composition on students' achievement: New evidence from natural population variation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 1287-1315.
77.
JacksonP.W. (1968). Life in Classrooms. New York: Rinehart and Winston.
78.
JohnsonG.E.StaffordF.P. (1973). Social returns to the quantity and quality of schooling. Journal of Human Resources, 8, 139-155.
79.
JohnsonS.M. (1990). Teachers at Work. New York: Basic Books.
80.
JohnstonJ.M. (1989). Teacher perceptions of changes in teaching when they have a small class or an aide. Peabody Journal of Education, 67, 106-122.
81.
KruegerA.B. (1999). Experimental estimates of education production functions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 497-532.
82.
KruegerA.HanushekE. (2000). The class size policy debate, Economic Policy Institute, Working Paper, 121. Washington, DC. Available: http://epinet.org.
83.
KruegerA.WhitmoreD. (2001). The effect of attending a small class in the early grades on college-test taking and middle school test results: Evidence from Project STAR. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper W7656. The Economic Journal, 111, 1-28.
84.
LazearE.P. (1999). Educational production. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 7349.
85.
LindbloomD.H. (1970). Class Size as It Affects Instructional Procedures and Educational Outcomes. Minneapolis, MN: Educational Research and Development Council of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. ERIC document no. ED 059 532.
86.
LortieD.C. (1975). Schoolteacher. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
87.
McCainH.M.MustardF. (1999). Reversing the Real Brain Drain: Early Years Study. Toronto, CA: Children's Secretariate.
88.
McPhersonM.S.ShapiroM.O. (1998), The Student Aid Game. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
89.
MeyerJ.W.RowanB. (1983). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony & the structure of educational organizations. In MeyerJ.W.ScottW.R. (Eds.), Organizational Environments (pp. 21-44, 71-97). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
90.
MolnarA.SmithP.ZahorikJ.PalmerA.HalbachA. (1999). Evaluating the SAGE Programml: A pilot program in targeted pupil-teacher reduction in Wisconsin. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 165-178.
91.
MonkD.H. (1994). Subject area preparation of secondary mathematics and science teachers and student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 13, 125-145.
92.
MonkD.H.KingJ.A. (1995). Multilevel teacher resource effects on pupil performance in secondary mathematics and science: The case of teacher subject matter preparation. In EhrenbergR.G. (Ed.), Choices and Consequences: Contemporary Policy Issues In Education. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
93.
MostellerF. (1995). The Tennessee study of class size in the early school grades: The future of children, vol. 5, 113-127.
94.
MostellerF.LightR.SachsJ. (1996). Sustained inquiry in education: Lessons from skill grouping and class size. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 797-842.
95.
MostellerF.MoynihanD.P. (Eds.). (1970). On Equality of Educational Opportunity. New York: Random House.
96.
NewellC.A. (1943). Class Size and Adaptability. New York: New York Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University.
97.
NyeB.HedgesL.V.KonstantopoulosS. (1999). The long-term effects of small classes: A five-year follow-up of the Tennessee class size experiment. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 127-142.
98.
OlsonM.R. (1971). Ways to achieve quality in small classrooms: Some definitive answers. Phi Delta Kappan, 53, (1), 63-65.
99.
OttoH.J.CondonM.L.JamesE.W.OlsonW.WeberR.A. (1954). Class Size Factors in Elementary Schools. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
100.
ParrishT.BrewerD.J. (1998). Class Size Reduction Policies and Rising Enrollments: Cost Implications Over the Next Decade. Palo Alto, CA: American Institutes for Research.
101.
ParsonsT. (1959). The school class as a social system. Harvard Educational Review, 29, 297-328.
102.
PetersonP.L.McCartheyS.J.ElmoreR.F. (1996). Learning from school restructuring. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 149-153.
103.
PughJ.B.Jr. (1965). The Performance of Teachers and Pupils in Small Classes. New York: Institute of Administrative Research, Teachers College, Columbia University.
104.
RaudenbushS.W.BrykA.S. (1986). A hierarchical model for studying school effects. Sociology of Education, 59, 1-17.
105.
RaudenbushS.W.WillmsJ.D. (1995). The estimation of school effects. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 20, 4, 307-355.
106.
ReesD.I.ArgusL.M.BrewerD.J. (1996). Tracking in the United States: Descriptive statistics from NELS. Economics of Education Review, 15, 83-89.
RiceJ.K. (1999). The impact of class size on instructional strategies and the use of time in high school mathematics and science courses. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 215-229.
109.
RichmanH. (1955). Educational Practices as Affected By Class Size. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, unpublished doctoral dissertation.
110.
RitterG.W.BoruchR.F. (1999). The political and institutional origins of a randomized controlled trial on elementary and school class size. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 111-126.
111.
RobinsonG.E. (1990). Synthesis of research on effects of class size. Educational Leadership, 47, 80-90.
112.
RobinsonG.E.Wittebols (1986). Class Size Research: A Related Cluster Analysis for Decision Making. Arlington, VA: Educational Research Services.
113.
RossD.H.McKennaB.H. (1955). Class Size: The Multi-Million Dollar Question. New York: Institute of Administrative Research, Teachers College, Columbia University.
114.
ScottW.R.MeyerJ.W. (1983). The organization of societal sectors. In MeyerJ.W.ScottW.R. (Eds.), Organizational Environments (pp. 129-153). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
115.
SelznickP. (1957). Leadership in Administration (p. 17). New York: Harper & Row.
116.
ShapsonS.M.WrightE.N.EasonG.FitzgeraldJ. (1980). An experimental study of the effects of class size. American Educational Research Journal, 17, 141-152.
117.
SlavinR. (1989). Class size and student achievement: Small effects of small classes. Educational Psychologist, 24, 106.
118.
SlavinR.E. (1989). Achievement effects of substantial reductions in class size. In SlavinR.E. (Ed.), School and Classroom Organization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
119.
SmithM.L.GlassG.V. (1980). Meta-analysis of research on class size and its relation to attitudes and instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 17, 419-433.
120.
StaszC.StecherB.M. (2000). Teaching mathematics and language arts in reduced size and non-reduced size classrooms. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22, 313-329.
121.
StecherB.M.BohrnstedtG.W. (2000). Class Size Reductions in California: The 1998-99 Evaluation Findings. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education.
122.
StraussR.P. (1993). Who Should Teach in Pennsylvania's Public Schools. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University Center for Public Financial Management.
123.
StraussR.P.SawyerE. (1986). Some new evidence on teacher and student competencies. Economics of Education Review, 5, 41-48.
124.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1999). Statistical abstract of the United States: 1999(tables 83, 272, 307, 659, 760, 761). Available: http://www.census.govWashington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
125.
U.S. Department of Education. (1999). The Digest of Education Statistics, 1999 (tables 65, 78, 108). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
126.
WelchF. (1967). Labor market discrimination: An interpretation of income differences in the rural South. Journal of Political Economy, 75, 225-240.
127.
WhitsettR.C. (1955). Comparing the Individualities of Large Secondary School Classes with Small Secondary School Classes through the Use of a Structured Observation Schedule. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, unpublished doctoral dissertation.
128.
WillmsD.KerckhoffA.C. (1995). The challenge of developing new social indicators. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17, 113-131.
129.
WillmsJ.D.RaudenbushS.W. (1992). A longitudinal hierarchical linear model for estimating school effects and their stability. Journal of Educational Measurement, 26, 209-232.
130.
WillmsD.RaudenbushS.W. (1997). Effective schools research: Methodological issues. In SahaL.J. (Ed.), The International Encyclopaedia of the Sociology of Education (1934-1939). New York: Elsevier.
131.
WillmsD.SomersM.A. (2000). Schooling Outcomes in Latin America: Report prepared for UNESCO. Fredricton, NB: Canadian Research Institute for Social Policy.
132.
WordE.R. (1990). The State of Tennessee's Pupil/Teacher Achievement Ratio (STAR) Project. Nashville, TN: Tennessee Department of Education.