Lawrie Balfour, Benjamin Hertzberg, Jack Knight and Cara Wong offer comments on my book, The Imperative of Integration, that raise critically important questions about the ways a pragmatist methodology should treat ideals in non-ideal theory. In this article, I reply to their comments as well as provide some reflections on the proper level of abstraction in non-ideal theory and on what kinds of results we can expect from it.
AndersonE. (2010) The Imperative of Integration. Princteon, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2.
CalhounC. (2007) Nations Matter: Culture, History and the Cosmopolitan Dream. London: Routledge.
3.
CohenG. A. (2003) ‘Facts and Principles’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 31 (3), 211–45.
4.
DeweyJ. (1976 [1915]) ‘The Logic of Judgments of Practice’, in BoydstonJ. A. (ed.), The Middle Works, 1899–1924, volume 8.Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, pp. 14–49.
5.
DeweyJ.TuftsJ. (1981 [1932]) ‘Ethics’, in BoydstonJ. A. (ed.), The Later Works, 1925–1953, volume 7.Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
6.
GilbertD. (2006) Stumbling on Happiness. New York: A. A. Knopf.
7.
HajnalZ. (2001) ‘White Residents, Black Incumbents and a Declining Racial Divide’, American Political Science Review, 95, 603–17.
8.
PildesR. (2002) ‘Is Voting-rights Law Now at War with Itself? Social Science and Voting Rights in the 2000s’, North Carolina Law Review, 80 (5), 1517–73.
