Two related concepts have been used to understand the welfare state – ‘decommodification’ and the ‘workfare’ or the ‘competition’ state, as it relates to processes of ‘recommodification’. I show how these related literatures may be integrated in order to enhance our understanding of current labour market policies. Applying these concepts to an analysis of the ideas and policies of New Labour leads to the conclusion that state welfare services are being reconfigured to serve more effectively the needs of the market, through a process of ‘administrative recommodification’.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BartlettW.PropperC.WilsonD.Le GrandJ. (eds) (1994) Quasi-Markets in the Welfare State: the Emerging Findings. Bristol: SAUS.
2.
BerthoudR. (1998) Disability Benefits: a Review of the Issues and Options for Reform. London: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
BorehamP.HallR.LeetM. (1996) ‘Labour and Citizenship: the Development of Welfare State Regimes’, Journal of Public Policy, 16 (2), 203–27.
5.
BurnhamP. (1997) ‘Globalisation: States, Markets and Class Relations’, Historical Materialism, 1 (1), 150–60.
6.
CernyP. (1990) The Changing Architecture of Politics: Structure, Agency and the Future of the State. London: Sage.
7.
Commission on Social Justice (1994) Social Justice: Strategies for National Renewal. London: Vintage.
8.
Department for Education and Employment (2001) Departmental Report. London: Stationery Office.
9.
Department of Health (1999a) Joint Investment Plans Guidance: Welfare to Work for Disabled People. London: DoH.
10.
Department of Health (1999b) Caring About Carers: a National Strategy for Carers. London: DoH.
11.
Department for Social Security (1998a) A New Contract for Welfare: New Ambitions for Our Country. London: Stationery Office.
12.
Department for Social Security (1998b) A New Contract for Welfare: Support for Disabled People, Cm 4103.London: Stationery Office.
13.
DominelliL.HoogveltA. (1996) ‘Globalization and the Technocratization of Social Work’, Critical Social Policy, 16 (2), 45–62.
14.
Esping-AndersenG. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity.
15.
Esping-AndersenG. (ed.) (1996) Welfare States in Transition: National Adaptations in Global Economies. London: Sage.
16.
EtzioniA. (1995) The Spirit of Community: Rights, Responsibilities and the Communitarian Agenda. London: Fontana.
17.
GinsbergN. (1992) Divisions of Welfare: a Critical Introduction to Comparative Social Policy. London: Sage.
18.
GriffithsG. (2001) Making it Work: Inspection of Welfare to Work for Disabled People. London: Department of Health.
19.
HeldD.McGrewA.GoldblattD.PerratonJ. (1999) Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture. Cambridge: Polity.
20.
HirstP.ThompsonG. (1999) Globalization in Question. Cambridge: Polity.
21.
HoldenC. (1999) ‘Globalisation, Social Exclusion and Labour's New Work Ethic’, Critical Social Policy, 19 (4), 529–38.
22.
HydeM. (2000) ‘From Welfare to Work? Social Policy for Disabled People of Working Age in the United Kingdom in the 1990s’, Disability and Society, 15 (2), 327–41.
23.
JacksonP. M. (2001) ‘Public Expenditure’, in SawyerM. (ed.), The UK Economy: a Manual of Applied Economics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
JessopB. (1993) ‘Towards a Schumpeterian Workfare State? Preliminary Remarks on Post-Fordist Political Economy’, Studies in Political Economy, 40, 7–39.
25.
JessopB. (1994) ‘The Transition to Post-Fordism and the Schumpeterian Workfare State’, in BurrowsR.LoaderB. (eds), Towards a Post-Fordist Welfare State. London: Routledge.
26.
JessopB. (2000) ‘From the KWNS to the SWPR’, in LewisG.GewirtzS.ClarkeJ. (eds), Rethinking Social Policy. London: Sage.
27.
LayardR. (1997) What Labour Can Do. London: Warner.
28.
LayardR.NickellS.JackmanR. (1991) Unemployment: Macroeconomic Performance and the Labour Market. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
LayardR.NickellS.JackmanR. (1994) The Unemployment Crisis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
LevitasR. (1996) ‘The Concept of Social Exclusion and the new Durkheimian Hegemony’, Critical Social Policy, 46 (1), 5–20.
31.
MarshallT. H. (1950) ‘Citizenship and Social Class’, in MarshallT. H. (ed.), Citizenship and Social Class and Other Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
MessnerS. F.RosenfieldR. (1997) ‘Political Restraint of the Market and Levels of Criminal Homocide: a Cross-National Application of Institutional-Anomie Theory’, Social Forces, 75 (4), 1, 393–416.
33.
MishraR. (1999) Globalization and the Welfare State. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
34.
MohanJ. (1991) ‘The Internationalization and Commercialization of Health Care in Britain’, Environment and Planning A (23), 853–67.
35.
MoranM.WoodB. (1996) ‘The Globalization of Health Care Policy’, in GummetP. (ed.), Globalization and Public Policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
36.
O'ConnorJ. (1973) The Fiscal Crisis of the State. New York: St. Martin's Press.
37.
OffeC. (1984) Contradictions of the Welfare State. London: Hutchinson.
38.
PiersonP. (1996) ‘The New Politics of the Welfare State’, World Politics, 48 (January), 143–79.
39.
PiersonP. (1998) ‘Irresistible Forces, Immovable Objects: Post-Industrial Welfare States Confront Permanent Austerity’, Journal of European Public Policy, 5 (4), 539–60.
40.
PolanyiK. (1980) The Great Transformation. New York: Octagon.
41.
PowellM. (ed.) (1999) New Labour, New Welfare State?: The Third Way in British Social Policy. Bristol: Policy.
42.
ReichR. B. (1991) The Work of Nations. London: Simon & Schuster.
43.
RhodesM. (1996) ‘Globalization and West European Welfare States: a Critical Review of Recent Debates’, Journal of European Social Policy, 6 (4), 305–27.
44.
RoomG. (2000) ‘Commodification and Decommodification: a Developmental Critique’, Policy and Politics, 28 (3), 331–51.
45.
RuigrokW.van TulderR. (1995) The Logic of International Restructuring. London: Routledge.
46.
SykesR.PalierB.PriorP. M. (eds) (2001) Globalization and European Welfare States: Challenges and Change. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
47.
Taylor-GoobyP. (1997) ‘In Defence of Second Best Theory: State, Class and Capital in Social Policy’, Journal of Social Policy, 26 (2), 171–92.
48.
WeissL. (1998) The Myth of the Powerless State: Governing the Economy in a Global Era. Cambridge: Polity.
