Ambivalent Sexism and the Dumb Blonde: Men's and Women's Reactions to Sexist Jokes

Abstract

This article examines the relationship between gender, hostile sexism, benevolent sexism and reactions to a seemingly innocuous genre of sexist humor, the dumb blonde joke. After hearing an audiotaped conversation in which two students swapped dumb blonde jokes, participants high in hostile sexism rated the jokes as more amusing and less offensive than those low in hostile sexism. Among individuals low in hostile sexism, however, benevolent sexism interacted with gender. Specifically, men high in benevolent sexism found the jokes significantly more amusing and less offensive than either women in the same group or men low in both hostile and benevolent sexism. This study replicates and extends previous research examining the relationship between hostile sexism and the enjoyment of sexist humor, and underscores the possibility that benevolent sexism may represent qualitatively distinct attitudes for men and women.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ford

T. E.

(2000). Effects of sexist humor on tolerance of sexist events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1094–1107.

Freud

(1960). Jokes and their relation to the unconscious New York: Norton.

Glick

Fiske

S. T.

(1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.

LaFrance

Woodzicka

J. A.

(1998). No laughing matter: Women's verbal and nonverbal reactions to sexist humor. In Swim

Stangor

(Eds.), Prejudice: The target's perspective (pp. 61–80. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Lyman

(1987). The fraternal bond as a joking relationship: A case study of the role of sexist jokes in male group bonding. In Kimmel

M. S.

(Ed.), Changing men: New directions in research on men and masculinity. Sage focus editions, Vol. 88 (pp. 148–163. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

McConahay

J. B.

(1986). Modern racism, ambivalence, and the Modern Racism Scale. In Dovidio

J. F.

Gaertner

S. L.

(Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 91–125. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.

Mitchell

(1977). The sexual perspective in the appreciation and interpretation of jokes. Western Folklore, 36, 303–329.

Moore

Griffiths

Payne

(1987). Gender, attitudes towards women, and the appreciation of sexist humor. Sex Roles, 16, 521–531.

Paludi

M. A.

Barickman

R. B.

(1998). Sexual harassment, work, and education: A resource manual for prevention (2nd ed.). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

10.

Paulus

D. L.

(1988). Assessing self-deception and impression management in self-reports: The balanced inventory of desirable responding. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

11.

Phillips

(2000). The Vogue book of blondes New York: Viking Studio.

12.

Ryan

Kanjorski

(1998). The enjoyment of sexist humor, rape attitudes, and relationship aggression in college students. Sex Roles, 38, 743–756.

13.

Wyer

R. S.

Collins

J. E.

(1992). A theory of humor elicitation. Psychology Review, 99, 663–688.