Ambivalent Sexism and Attitudes Toward Wife Abuse in Turkey and Brazil

Abstract

Men and women in Turkey and Brazil completed the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (Glick & Fiske, 1996) and measures of attitudes about wife abuse. In both nations hostile sexism (HS) and benevolent sexism (BS) positively correlated with attitudes that legitimize abuse. Regression analyses revealed that HS accounted for unique variance, but BS (once HS was controlled) was unrelated to wife abuse attitudes. These results: (a) add to the evidence for the cross-cultural validity of ambivalent sexism, (b) suggest that HS supports the justification of violence against wives, and (c) imply that the ostensible protectiveness of BS is contingent, failing to shield women from abuse if they are deemed to have challenged a husband's authority or violated conventional gender roles.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Briere

(1987). Predicting self-reported likelihood of battering: Attitudes and childhood experiences. Journal of Research in Personality, 21, 61–69.

Cohen

Nisbett

R. E.

Bowdle

B. F.

Schwarz

(1996). Insult, aggression, and the southern culture of honor: An “experimental ethnography.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 945–960.

Glick

Diebold

Bailey-Werner

Zhu

(1997). The two faces of Adam: Ambivalent sexism and polarized attitudes toward women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1323–1334.

Glick

Fiske

S. T.

(1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.

Glick

Fiske

S. T.

(2001). Ambivalent sexism. In Zanna

M. P.

(Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 115–188), Thousand Oaks, CA: Academic Press.

Glick

Fiske

S. T.

Mladinic

Saiz

Abrams

Masser

(2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763–775.

Haj-Yahia

M. M.

(1998). A patriarchal perspective of beliefs about wife beating among Palestinian men from the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. Journal of Family Issues, 19, 595–621.

Lonsway Fitzgerald (1995). Attitudinal antecedents of rape myth acceptance: A theoretical and empirical examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 704–711.

Malamuth

(1986). Predictors of naturalistic sexual aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 953–962.

10.

Rittersberger-Tiliç

Kalaycioglu

(2000). Legitimating and re-production of domestic violence in Turkish families. Zeitschrif für Türkeistudien, 2, 225–239.

11.

Saffiotti

H. I. B.

(1994). Violencia de genero no Brasil contemporaneo (Gender violence in contemporary Brazil). In Saffioti

H. I. B.

Munoz-Vargas

(Eds.), Mulher brasileira é assim [This is the Brazilian woman] (pp. 151–193. Rio de Janeiro: Rosa dos Tempos.

12.

Sakalli

(2001). Beliefs about wife beating among Turkish college students: The effects of patriarchy, sexism, and sex differences. Sex Roles, 42(9/10), 599–611.

13.

Saunders

D. G.

Lynch

A. B.

Grayson

Linz

(1987). The inventory of beliefs about wife beating: The construction and initial validation of a measure of beliefs and attitudes. Violence and Victims, 2, 39–57.

14.

United Nations Development Programme. (1998). Human development report 1998 New York: Oxford University Press.