The beliefs of 356 Jordanian women about wife-beating were investigated, using a self-administered questionnaire. The participants showed a strong tendency to justify wife-beating, to believe that women benefit from violence against them, and to blame women for their beating. Furthermore, the participants expressed clear opposition to formal assistance for battered women from governmental agencies. In this vein, they considered wife abuse a personal problem that should be treated within the family. The results also revealed that while the women showed a weak tendency to blame violent husbands for wife abuse, the prevailing belief was that violent men should not be punished for their behavior. The results are analyzed in light of the patriarchal ideology that typifies Arab culture and predominates in Jordanian society. Finally, the article discusses the implications of the results for future research, prevention, and establishment of appropriate services for combating wife abuse in Jordanian society.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarakatH. (1993). The Arab world: Society, culture, and stateBerkeley, CA: University of California Press.
2.
BurtM. R. (1980). Cultural myths and support for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217–230.
3.
CaldwellJ. (1982). Theory of fertility declineLondon: Academic Press.
4.
DobashR. E.DobashR. P. (1979). Violence against wivesNew York: The Free Press.
5.
DunnM.DeBonisN. J. (1979). Teachers' and counselors' guide to accompany a Marriage Role Expectations InventorySaluda, NC: Family Life Publications Inc.
6.
El-ZanatyF.HusseinE. M.ShawkyG. A.WayA. A.KishorS. (1996). Egypt demographic and health survey 1995Cairo, Egypt: National Population Council.
7.
Finn (1986). The relationship between sex role attitudes and attitudes supporting marital violence. Sex Roles, 14, 235–244.
8.
Haj-YahiaM. M. (1996). Wife abuse in the Arab society in Israel: Challenge for future change. In EdlesonJ. L.EisikovitsZ. C. (Eds.), The future of intervention with battered women and their families (pp. 87–101. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
Haj-YahiaM. M. (1997). Predicting beliefs about wife beating among engaged Arab men in Israel. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 530–545.
10.
Haj-YahiaM. M. (1998a). A patriarchal perspective on beliefs about wife-beating among Arab Palestinian men from the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Journal of Family Issues, 19, 595–621.
11.
Haj-YahiaM. M. (1998b). Beliefs about wife-beating among Palestinian women: The influence of their patriarchal ideology. Violence Against Women, 4, 533–558.
12.
Haj-YahiaM. M. (1998c). Perceptions of abusive and violent husbands by engaged Arab men from Israel. Journal of Social Psychology, 138, 772–786.
13.
Haj-YahiaM. M. (1999). Wife abuse and its psychological consequences as revealed by the First Palestinian National Survey on violence against women. Journal of Family Psychology, 13, 642–662.
14.
Haj-YahiaM. M. (2000a). The incidence of wife abuse and battering and some sociodemographic correlates as revealed by two national surveys in Palestinian society. Journal of Family Violence, 15, 347–374.
15.
Haj-YahiaM. M. (2000b). Implications of wife abuse and battering for self-esteem, depression, and anxiety as revealed by the Second Palestinian National Survey on violence against women. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 435–463.
16.
Haj-YahiaM. M. (2000c). Wife abuse and battering in the sociocultural context of Arab society. Family Process, 39, 237–255.
17.
Haj-YahiaM. M. (2001). The impact of wife abuse on marital relations as revealed by the Second Palestinian National Survey on violence against women. Unpublished manuscript.
18.
Haj-YahiaM. M. (in press). Beliefs about wife beating among Arab men from Israel: The influence of their patriarchal ideology. Journal of Family Violence.
19.
KandiyotiD. A. (1987). Emancipated but unliberated? Reflections on the Turkish case. Feminist Studies, 13, 317–338.
20.
KandiyotiD. A. (1988). Bargaining with patriarchy. Gender & Society, 2, 274–290.
21.
MannM. (1986). A crisis in stratification theory? Persons, households, families, lineages, genders, classes, and nations. In CromptonR.MannM. (Eds.), Gender and stratification (pp. 40–56. London: Polity Press.
22.
MoghadamV M. (1992). Patriarchy and the politics of gender in modernizing societies: Iran, Pakistan and Afghanistan. International Sociology, 7, 35–53.
23.
MuehlenhardC. L.MacNaughtonJ. S. (1988). Women's beliefs about women who “lead men on.”Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 7, 65–79.
24.
SaundersD. G.LynchA. B.GraysonM.LinzD. (1987). The inventory of beliefs about wife beating: The construction and initial validation of a measure of beliefs and attitudes. Violence and Victims, 2, 39–57.
25.
SmithM. D. (1990). Patriarchal ideology and wife beating: A test of a feminist hypothesis. Violence and Victims, 5, 257–274.
26.
Social Studies School Service (April 25, 2001) [On-line]. Available: http://wwwcountrywatch.com/@School/.
27.
SpenceJ. T.HelmreichR. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological correlates and antecedentsAustin, TX: University of Texas Press.
28.
StowasserB. F. (1993). Women's issues in modern Islamic thought. In TuckerJ. E. (Ed.), Arab women (pp. 3–28. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.
29.
The Koran. Rashid Khalifa Translation.
30.
YllöK. A.StrausM. A. (1990). Patriarchy and violence against wives: The impact of structural and normative factors. In StrausM. A.GellesR. J. (Eds.), Physical violence in American families (pp. 383–399. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publications.
