Student evaluations of the quality of their women's and gender studies (WGS) experience and predictors of experience quality were studied in a sample of 326 students from 23 WGS classes. Higher initial appreciation/acceptance of diversity, capacity for interpersonal relationships, and class expectations predicted more positive experience ratings. These relationships were mediated by students' alliance with their teacher and cohesion with classmates. A small proportion of students (11.6%), spread across 14 classes, did not rate their experience positively. Perceptions of teacher and classmate intolerance and bias were assessed in this subset of students. Average ratings of intolerance were slightly positive for teachers and neutral for classmates. Implications of the findings for understanding students' WGS experiences are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaronR.KennyD. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research. Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
2.
BignellK. C. (1996). Building feminist praxis out of feminist pedagogy: The importance of students' perspectives. Women's Studies International Forum, 19, 315–325.
3.
BrokesA. J.TwineF. W. (1999). Inter-racial teaching teams, antiracism, and the politics of white resistance: Teaching introduction to women's studies at a predominantly white research institution. In WinklerB.DiPalmaC. (Eds.), Teaching introduction to women's studies (pp. 123–135). Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
4.
BrushL. R.GoldA. R.WhiteM. G. (1978). The paradox of intention and effect: A women's studies course. Signs, 3, 870–883.
5.
CrawfordM.SuckleJ. A. (1999). Overcoming resistance to feminism in the classroom. In DavisS.CrawfordM.SebrechtsJ. (Eds.), Coming into her own. Educational success in girls and women (pp. 155–170). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
FellmanC. A.WinsteadB. A. (1992). Old Dominion University: Making connections in the classroom. In MusilC. M. (Ed.), The courage to question: Women's studies and student learning (pp. 82–108). Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and National Women's Studies Association.
7.
FinkeL.MaveetyE.ShawC.WardJ. (1992). Lewis and Clark: A single curriculum. In MusilC. M. (Ed.), The courage to question: Women's studies and student learning (pp. 43–81). Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and National Women's Studies Association.
8.
ForrestL.RosenbergF. (1997). A review of the feminist pedagogy literature: The neglected child of feminist psychology. Applied & Preventive Psychology, 6, 179–192.
9.
GarfieldS. (1994). Research on client variables in psychotherapy. In BerginA. E.GarfieldS. L. (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (4th ed., pp. 190–228). New York: Wiley.
10.
HenryW.StruppH. H. (1994). The therapeutic alliance as interpersonal process. In HorvathA. O.GreenbergL. S. (Eds.), The working alliance: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 51–84). New York: Wiley.
11.
HertzR.ReverbyS. (1992). Wellesley College: Counting the meanings. In MusilC. M. (Ed.), The courage to question: Women's studies and student learning (pp. 109–131). Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and National Women's Studies Association.
12.
HobermanH. M.LewinsohnP. M.TilsonM. (1988). Group treatment of depression: Individual predictors of outcome. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 393–398.
13.
HoffmannL.StakeJ. E. (1998). Feminist pedagogy in theory and practice: An empirical investigation. National Women's Studies Association Journal, 10, 71–97.
14.
HorvathA. O. (1994). Empirical validation of Bordin's pantheoretical model of the alliance: The Working Alliance Inventory perspective. In HorvathA. O.GreenbergL. S. (Eds.), The working alliance: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 13–37). New York: Wiley.
15.
HoxJ. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
HughesG. (1999). Revisiting the “men problem” in introductory women's studies classes. In WinklerB.DiPalmaC. (Eds.), Teaching introduction to women's studies (pp. 73–85). Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
17.
JoyceA. S.PiperW. E. (1998). Expectancy, the therapeutic alliance, and treatment outcome in short-term individual psychotherapy. Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 7, 236–248.
18.
KimmelE.WorellJ. (1997). Preaching what we practice: Principles and strategies of feminist pedagogy. In WorellJ.JohnsonN. (Eds.), Shaping the future of feminist psychology (pp. 121–147). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
19.
KleinR. (1987). The dynamics of the women's studies classroom: A review essay of the teaching practice of women's studies in higher education. Women's Studies International Forum, 10, 187–206.
20.
LehrmanK. (1993, September/October). Off course. Mother Jones, 45–68.
21.
LuborskyL. (1994). Therapeutic alliances as predictors of psychotherapy outcomes: Factors explaining the predictive success. In HorvathA. O.GreenbergL. S. (Eds.), The working alliance: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 38–49). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
22.
MalkinC.StakeJ. E. (2002). Changes in social attitudes and self-confidence in the gender studies classroom: The role of teacher alliance and student cohesion. Manuscript submitted for publication.
23.
MayV. (1999). The ideologue, the pervert, and the nurturer, or, negotiating student perceptions in teaching introductory women's studies courses. In WinklerB.DiPalmaC. (Eds.), Teaching introduction to women's studies (pp. 21–35). Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
24.
MillerW. E.KinderD. R.RosenstoneS. J. (1993). American National Election Study, 1992: Pre- and post-election survey. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
25.
NeitzM. J.GadboisM. (1992). University of Missouri-Columbia: For women's sake. In MusilC. M. (Ed.), The courage to question: Women's studies and student learning (pp. 109–131). Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and National Women's Studies Association.
26.
OrlinskyD. E.GraweK.ParksB. K. (1994). Process and outcome in psychotherapy—Nocheinmal. In BerginA. E.GarfieldS. L. (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (4th ed., pp. 270–379). New York: Wiley.
27.
OrrD. J. (1993). Toward a critical rethinking of feminist pedagogical praxis and resistant male students. Canadian Journal of Education, 18, 239–254.
28.
PataiD.KoertgeN. (1994). Professing feminism: Cautionary tales from the strange world of women's studies. New York: Basic Books.
29.
RhoadesK. A. (1999). Border zones: Identification, resistance, and transgressive teaching in introductory women's studies courses. In WinklerB.DiPalmaC. (Eds.), Teaching introduction to women's studies (pp. 225–239). Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
30.
RinehartJ. A. (1999). When things fall apart. In WinklerB.DiPalmaC. (Eds.), Teaching introduction to women's studies (pp. 225–239). Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
31.
RomneyP.TatumB.JonesJ. (1992). Feminist strategies for teaching about oppression: The importance of process. Women's Studies Quarterly, 20, 95–110.
32.
SommersC. (1994). Who stole feminism: How women have betrayed women. New York: Simon & Schuster.
33.
SpenceJ. T.HelmreichR. (1972). The Attitudes Toward Women Scale: An objective instrument to measure attitudes toward the rights and roles of women in contemporary society. Journal Supplement Abstract Service, 2.
34.
StakeJ. E.GernerM. A. (1987). The women's studies experience: Personal and professional gains for women and men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 277–284.
35.
StakeJ. E.HoffmannF. (2001). Changes in student social attitudes, activism, and personal confidence in higher education: The role of women's studies. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 411–436.
36.
StakeJ. E.RoseS. (1994). The long-term impact of women's studies on students' personal lives and political activism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 403–412.
37.
TschuschkeV.DiesR. R. (1994). Intensive analysis of therapeutic factors and outcome in long-term inpatient groups. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 44, 185–208.
38.
WeberR. P. (1990). Basic content analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
39.
WeilerK. (1991). Freire and a feminist pedagogy of difference. Harvard Educational Review, 61, 449–474.
40.
WorellJ.WorellL. (1977). Support and opposition to the women's liberation movement: Some personality and parental correlates. Journal of Research in Personality, 11, 10–20.
