This paper examines personal narratives of struggle with schooling from working-class Latino parents whose children were in an experimental college access program at a diverse, metropolitan high school. The voices of parents of color have traditionally been silenced in schools and muted in educational research, despite their potential to shape student careers and aspirations. Drawing on narrative analysis, critical race theory, and sociocultural theory to inform data from an ethnographic case study, I discuss the role of agency and oppositional voice in parents’ stories. I delineate three narrative types that emerged in interviews and a series of parent meetings around college access issues: life stories of parents’ own struggles as students; stories of bureaucratic rebuff in parents’ encounters with staff in their children's schools; and counterstories that challenge official narratives of schooling. I argue that the sharing of such stories in free spaces is instrumental in the building of parents’ social networks, the negotiation of conflict with the school, and the formation of empowering family identities. If educators join the dialogue, such story exchange can offer insight into students’ multiple worlds and pave the way for improved family-school relations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AuerbachS. (2000). When multiple voices collide: Seeking “free space” in action research with parents of color. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
2.
AuerbachS. (2001). Under co-construction: Parent roles in promoting college access for students of color. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, UCLA Graduate School of Education and Information Studies.
3.
AyersW. (1989). The good preschool teacher: Six teachers reflect on their lives.New York: Teachers College Press.
4.
BloomL. R. (1998). Under the sign of hope: Feminist methodology and narrative interpretation.Albany: State University of New York Press.
5.
BrunerJ. (1991, Autumn). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18, 1–21.
6.
BurbulesN., & RiceS. (1991). Dialogue across difference: Continuing the conversation. Harvard Education Review, 61(4), 393–416.
7.
BurdellP., & SwadenerB. B. (1999). Critical personal narrative and autoethnography in education: Reflections on a genre. Educational Researcher, 28(6), 21–26.
8.
ClandininD. J., & ConnellyF. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9.
ClarkR. M. (1983). Family life and school achievement: Why poor Black children succeed or fail.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
ColemanJ. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 98–120.
11.
ComerJ. (1980). School power: Implications of an intervention project.New York: The Free Press.
12.
DarderA. (1991). Culture and power in the classroom: A critical foundation for bicultural education.Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey.
13.
DavidsonA. L. (1996). Making and molding identity: Student narratives on race, gender, and academic engagement.Albany: State University of New York Press.
14.
DelgadoR. (2000). Storytelling for oppositionists and others: A plea for narrative. In DelgadoR., & StefancicJ. (Eds.), Critical race theory: The cutting edge (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
15.
Delgado-GaitanC. (1991). Involving parents in the schools: A process of empowerment. American Journal of Education, 100(1), 20–46.
16.
Delgado-GaitanC. (1994a). Spanish-speaking families’ involvement in schools. In FagnanoC. L., & WerberB. Z. (Eds.), School, family, and community interaction: A view from the firing lines (pp. 85–96). Boulder, CO: Westview.
17.
Delgado-GaitanC. (1994b). Consejos: The power of cultural narratives. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 25(3), 298–316.
18.
DelpitL. (1988). The silenced dialogue. Harvard Educational Review, 58(3), 280–297.
19.
D'Emidio-CastonM., & BrownJ. H. (1998). The other side of the story: Student narratives on the California Drug, Alcohol, and Tobacco Education Programs. Evaluation Review, 22, 95–117.
20.
DoddA. W., & KonzalJ. (1999). Making our high schools better: How parents and teachers can work together.New York: St. Martin's Press.
21.
DornbuschS., & GlasgowK. (1996). The structural context of family-school relations. In BoothA., & DunnJ. (Eds.), Family-school links: How do they affect educational outcomes? (pp. 35–44). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
22.
EcclesJ., & HaroldR. (1993). Parent-school involvement during the early adolescent years. Teachers College Record, 94(3), 568–587.
23.
FineM. (1991). Framing dropouts: Notes on the politics of an urban public high school.Albany: State University of New York Press.
24.
FineM. (1993). [Ap]parent involvement: Reflections on parents, power, and urban public schools. Teachers College Record, 94(4), 682–709.
25.
FineM., & WeisL. (1998). The unknown city: Lives of poor and working-class adults.Boston: Beacon Press.
26.
FordhamS. (1996). Blacked out: Dilemmas of race, identity, and success at Capital High.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
27.
FullerB., ElmoreR., & OrfieldG. (1996). Policy-making in the dark: Illuminating the school choice debate. In FullerB., ElmoreR., & OrfieldG. (Eds.), Who chooses? Who loses? Culture, institutions, and the unequal effects of school choice (pp. 1–24). New York: Teachers College Press.
28.
GandaraP. (1995). Over the ivy wall: The educational mobility of low-income Chicanos.Albany: State University of New York Press.
29.
GandaraP. (1998). Capturing Latino students in the academic pipeline. California Policy Seminar Policy Brief Series, 10(3). Berkeley: University of California Latino/Latina Policy Research Program.
30.
GandaraP., & BialD. (1999). Paving the way to higher education: K-12 intervention programs for underrepresented youth (draft).Washington, DC: National Postsecondary Education Cooperative, National Center for Education Statistics.
31.
GonzalezN. (1996). Contestation and accommodation in parental narratives. Education and Urban Society, 29(1), 54–70.
32.
GutierrezK., RymesB., & LarsonJ. (1995). Script, counterscript, and underlife in the classroom: James Brown versus Brown v. Board of Education. Harvard Educational Review, 65(3), 445–471.
33.
Hoover-DempseyK., & SandlerH. (1997). Why do parents become involved in their children's education?Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 3–42.
34.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
35.
Ladson-BillingsG., & TateW. (1995). Toward a critical race theory of education. Teachers College Record, 97(1), 47–68.
36.
LamontM., & LareauA. (1988, Fall). Cultural capital: Allusions, gaps and glissandos in recent theoretical developments. Sociological Theory, 6, 153–168.
37.
LareauA. (1989). Home advantage: Social class and parental intervention in elementary education.New York: Falmer.
38.
LareauA., & HorvatE. (1999, January). Moments of social inclusion: Race, class and cultural capital in family school relationships. Sociology of Education, 71, 39–56.
Lawrence-LightfootS. (1978). Worlds apart: Relationships between families and schools.New York: Basic Books.
41.
Lawrence-LightfootS. (1981). Toward conflict and resolution: Relationships between families and schools. Theory into Practice, 20(2), 97–104.
42.
Lawrence LighfootS., & Hoffman DavisJ. (1997). The art and science of portraiture.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
43.
LincolnY. S. (1993). I and thou: Method, voice, and roles in research with the silenced. In TierneyW. G., & McLaughlinD. (Eds.), Naming silenced lives: Personal narratives and processes of educational change (pp. 28–47). New York: Routledge.
44.
LincolnY. S. (1995). In search of students’ voices. Theory into Practice, 34(2), 88–93.
45.
MarrisP. (1990). Witnesses, engineers, or storytellers? Roles of sociologists in social policy. In GansH. J. (Ed.), Sociology in America (pp. 75–87). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
46.
McLarenP. (1993). Border disputes: Multicultural narrative, identity formation, and critical pedagogy in postmodern America. In McLaughlinD., & TierneyW. G. (Eds.), Naming silenced lives: Personal narratives and the process of educational change (pp. 201–236). New York: Routledge.
47.
MehanH., VillanuevaI., HubbardL., & LintzA. (1996). Constructing school success: The consequences of untracking low-achieving students.New York: Cambridge University Press.
48.
MerriamS. (2001). Qualitative research and case study applications in education (rev. ed.) San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
49.
MeyersB., DowdyJ., & PatersonP. (2000). Finding the missing voices: Perspectives of the least visible families and their willingness and capacity for school involvement. Current Issues in Middle Level Education, 7(2), 59–79.
50.
MolesO. (1993). Collaboration between schools and disadvantaged parents: Obstacles and openings. In ChavkinN. (Ed.), Families and schools in a pluralistic society (pp. 21–52). Albany: State University of New York Press.
51.
PhelanP., DavidsonA. L., & CaoH. T. (1991). Students’ multiple worlds: Negotiating the boundaries of family, peer, and school cultures. Anthropology and Education Quarterly22(3), 224–250.
52.
PeshkinA. (1988). In search of subjectivity—one's own. Educational Researcher, 17(7), 17–22.
53.
ReeseL., BalzanoS., GallimoreR., & Goldenberg (1995). The concept of educación: Latino family values and American schooling. International Journal of Educational Research, 23(1), 57–81.
54.
RiessmanC. K. (1993). Narrative analysis. Qualitative Research Methods 30.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
55.
RogersJ. (2000). Navigating Futures: An introduction to emergent understandings. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
56.
RomoH. D., & FalboT. (1996). Latino high school graduation: Defying the odds.Austin: University of Texas Press.
57.
RubinH. J., & RubinI. S. (1995). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
58.
SchneiderA., & IngramH. (1993). Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy. American Political Science Review, 87(2), 334–347.
59.
ShannonS. (1996). Minority parental involvement: A Mexican mother's experience and a teacher's interpretation. Education and Urban Society, 29(1), 71–84.
60.
ShirleyD. (1997). Laboratories of democracy: Community organizing for school reform.Austin: University of Texas Press.
61.
SolorzanoD., & VillalpandoO. (1998). Critical race theory, marginality, and the experience of minority students in higher education. In TorresC., & MitchellT. (Eds.), Emerging issues in the sociology of education: Comparative perspectives (pp. 211–224). New York: State University of New York Press.
62.
SolorzanoD., & YossoT. (2000). Toward a critical race theory of Chicana and Chicano education. In TejedaC., CarilloC., & LeonardoZ. (Eds.), Charting terrains of Chicana(o)/Latina(o) education (pp. 35–65). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
63.
StakeR. (1994). Case studies. In DenzinN. K., & LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 236–247). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
64.
Suarez-OrozcoM., & Suarez-OrozcoC. (1993). Hispanic cultural psychology: Implications for education theory and research. In PhelanP., & DavidsonA. L. (Eds.), Renegotiating cultural diversity in American schools (pp. 108–138). New York: Teachers College Press.
65.
ValdésG. (1996). Con respeto: Bridging the distances between culturally diverse families and schools: An ethnographic portrait.New York: Teachers College Press.
66.
Van GalenJ. (1987). Maintaining control: The structuring of parent involvement. In NoblitG. W., & PinkW. T. (Eds.), Schooling in social context: Qualitative studies (pp. 78–90). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
67.
VillanuevaI. (1996). Change in the educational life of Chicano families across three generations. Education and Urban Society, 29(1), 13–34.
68.
VillanuevaI., & HubbardL. (1994). Toward redefining parent involvement: Making parents’ invisible strategies and cultural practices visible. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
69.
VillenasS., & DeyhleD. (1999). Critical race theory and ethnographies challenging the stereotypes: Latino families, schooling, resilience and resistance. Curriculum Inquiry, 29(4), 413–445.
70.
WeisnerT., GallimoreR., & JordanC. (1988). Unpackaging cultural effects on classroom learning: Native Hawaiian peer assistance and child-generated activity. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 19(4), 327–353.
71.
WengerE. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity.New York: Cambridge University Press.
72.
WintersW. G. (1993). African American mothers and urban schools: The power of participation.New York: Macmillan.
73.
YinR. K. (1993). Applications of case study research.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
74.
YonezawaS. (1997). Making decisions about students’ lives: An interactive study of secondary school students’ academic program selection. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, UCLA Graduate School of Education and Information Studies.
75.
YonezawaS., & OakesJ. (1999, April). Making parents partners in the placement process. Educational Leadership, 33–36.
