The concept of emergence is a central thread uniting Durkheim's theoretical and empirical work, yet this aspect of Durkheim's work has been neglected. I reinterpret Durkheim in light of theories of emergence developed by contemporary philosophers of mind, and I show that Durkheim's writings prefigure many elements of these contemporary theories. Reading Durkheim as an emergentist helps to clarify several difficult and confusing aspects of his work, and reveals a range of unresolved issues. I identify five such issues, and I show how Durkheim's writings on emergence suggest potential responses.
There can be no sociology unless societies exist, and … societies cannot exist if there are only individuals.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlexanderJeffrey C.1982. Theoretical Logic in Sociology, Volume Two: The Antinomies of Classical Thought: Marx and Durkheim.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
2.
AndersenPeter BøghEmmecheClausOleFinnemann NielsChristiansenPeder Voetmann, eds. 2000. Downward Causation: Minds, Bodies, and Matter.Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.
3.
ArcherMargaret S.1982. “Morphogenesis versus Structuration: On Combining Structure and Action.”, British Journal of Sociology33:455–83.
4.
ArcherMargaret S.1995. Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach.New York: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BechtelWilliamRichardsonRobert C.1993. Discovering Complexity: Decomposition and Localization as Strategies in Scientific Research.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
BeckermannAnsgarFlohrHansKimJaegwon, eds. 1992. Emergence or Reduction? Essays on the Prospects of Nonreductive Physicalism.Berlin: de Gruyter.
7.
BerthelotJean-Michel1995. 1895 Durkheim: L'Avènement de la Sociologie Scientifique.Toulouse, France: Presses Universitaires du Mirail.
8.
BhaskarRoy [1979] 1998. The Possibility of Naturalism.3d ed.New York: Routledge.
9.
BlauPeter M.1981. “Introduction: Diverse Views of Social Structure and their Common Denominator.” Pp. 1–23 in Continuity in structural inquiry, edited by BlauPeter M.MertonRobert K.. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
10.
BoutrouxÉmile [1874] 1916. The Contingency of the Laws of Nature. Chicago, IL: Open Court Publishing Company. (Originally published as a dissertation at the Sorbonne in 1874, titled De la Contingence des Lois de la Nature.).
11.
BoutrouxÉmile [1893] 1914. Natural Law in Science and Philosophy.New York: MacMillan Company. (From lectures presented at the Sorbonne 1892–1893.).
12.
BrooksRodney A.MaesPattie, eds. 1994. Artificial Life IV: Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on the Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13.
ChapmanDavid1987. “Planning for Conjunctive Goals.”, Artificial Intelligence32:333–78.
14.
ClarkAndy1997. Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15.
ClarkTerry N.1969. “Introduction to On Communication and Social Influence.”Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
16.
CohenIra J.1989. Structuration Theory: Anthony Giddens and the Constitution of Social Life.New York: St. Martin's Press.
17.
ComteAuguste [1842] 1854. The Positive Philosophy of Auguste Comte.New York: D. Appleton. (Originally published in French in six volumes, from 1830 to 1842.).
18.
ComteAuguste [1854] 1966. System of Positive Polity.New York: B. Franklin. (Originally published in French in four volumes, 1851–1854.).
19.
DavidsonDonald1970. “Mental Events.” Pp. 79–101 in Experience and Theory, edited by FosterLawrenceSwansonJ. W.. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
20.
DurkheimÉmile [1893] 1984. The Division of Labor in Society. New York: The Free Press. (Originally published as De la division du travail social: étude sur l'organisation des sociétés supérieures. Paris: Alcan, 1893.).
21.
DurkheimÉmile [1895] 1964. The Rules of Sociological Method. New York: The Free Press. (Originally published as Les règles de la méthode sociologique, Paris: Alcan, 1895.).
22.
DurkheimÉmile [1897] 1951. Suicide. Glencoe, IL: Free Press. (Originally published as Le Suicide: Étude de sociologie, Paris: Alcan, 1897.).
23.
DurkheimÉmile [1898] 1953. “Individual and Collective Representations.” Pp. 1–34 in Sociology and philosophy. Glencoe, IL: Free Press. (Originally published in Revue de Metaphysique et de Morale, 6, 1898.).
24.
DurkheimÉmile [1898–1899] 1960. “Prefaces to L'Année Sociologique.” Pp. 341–53 in Emile Durkheim, 1858–1917, edited by WolffKurt H.. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
25.
DurkheimÉmile [1900] 1960. “Sociology and its Scientific Field.” Pp. 354–75 in Emile Durkheim, 1858–1917, edited by WolffKurt H.. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
26.
DurkheimÉmile [1901] 1964. “Author's Preface to the Second Edition.” Pp. xli–lx. New York: The Free Press. (Originally published as ‘De la méthode objective en sociologie”, Revue de synthèse historique, 2, 1901, 3–17.).
27.
DurkheimÉmile [1903] 1982. “Sociology and the Social Sciences.” Pp. 175–208 in The Rules of Sociological Method, edited by LukesSteven. New York: Free Press. (Originally published, with Paul Fauconnet, as “Sociologie et sciences sociales,” Revue philosophique, 55, 1903, pp. 465–97).
28.
DurkheimÉmile [1907] 1982. “Letter to the Director.” Pp. 258–60 in The Rules of Sociological Method, edited by LukesSteven. New York: Free Press. (Originally published in Revue neo-scolastique, 14, 1907, 612–14.).
29.
DurkheimÉmile1909–1912. Review of Simon Deploige, Le conflit de la morale et de la sociologie.L'Année Sociologique12:326–28.
30.
DurkheimÉmile [1912] 1915. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. New York: Free Press. (Originally published as Les Formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse: le système totémique en Australie, Paris: Alcan, 1912.).
31.
DurkheimÉmile [1914] 1960. “The Dualism of Human Nature and its Social Conditions.” Pp. 325–40 in Emile Durkheim, 1858–1917, edited by WolffKurt H.. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
32.
EpsteinJoshua M.AxtellRobert1996. Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33.
FentonSteve1984. Durkheim and Modern Sociology.New York: Cambridge University Press.
34.
FodorJerry A.1974. “Special Sciences (Or: The Disunity of Science as a Working Hypothesis).”, Synthese28:97–115.
35.
GaneMike1988. On Durkheim's Rules of Sociological Method.New York: Routledge.
36.
GiddensAnthony1970. “Durkheim as a Review Critic.”, Sociological Review18:171–96.
37.
GiddensAnthony1977. Studies in Social and Political Theory.New York: Basic Books.
GiddensAnthony1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
40.
GilbertNigelConteRosaria, eds. 1995. Artificial Societies: The Computer Simulation of Social Life.London: UCL Press.
41.
GoldsteinL. J. [1958] 1973. “Two Theses of Methodological Individualism.” Pp. 277–86 in Modes of Individualism and Collectivism, edited by O'NeillJohn. Hampshire, UK: Gregg Revivals. (Original work published in The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 9(1958).).
HinkleRoscoe C.1960. “Durkheim in American Sociology.” Pp. 267–95 in Essays on Sociology and Philosophy, edited by WolffK. H.. New York: Harper and Row.
44.
Hoyningen-HuenePaulWuketitsFranz M., eds. 1989. Reductionism and Systems Theory in the Life Sciences.Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
45.
HumphreysPaulRohrlichFritzRosenbergAlexWimsattWilliam C.1996. “Symposium: Emergence and Supervenience: Alternatives to Unity by Reduction.”Philosophy of Science64:S337–S384.
46.
JonesS. G. Stedman1995. “Charles Renouvier and Émile Durkheim: ‘Les Règles de La Méthode Sociologique.’ ”Sociological Perspectives38:27–40.
47.
KimJaegwon1992. “‘Downward Causation’ in Emergentism and Nonreductive Physicalism.” Pp. 119–38 in Emergence or Reduction? Essays on the Prospects of Nonreductive Physicalism, edited by BeckermannAnsgarFlohrHansKimJaegwon. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
48.
KimJaegwon1993. Supervenience and Mind.New York: Cambridge University Press.
49.
LangtonChristopher G., ed. 1994. Artificial Life III: Proceedings Volume XVII, Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
50.
LesserVictor, ed. 1995. ICMAS-95: First International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
51.
LoweE. J.1993. “The Causal Autonomy of the Mental.”, Mind102:629–44.
52.
LukesSteven1973. Émile Durkheim: His Life and Work.London: Penguin Press.
53.
LukesSteven1982. “Introduction.” Pp. 1–27 in The Rules of Sociological Method.New York: Free Press.
MayhewBruce H.1980. “Structuralism versus Individualism, Part 1: Shadowboxing in the Dark.”, Social Forces59:335–75.
56.
McLaughlinBrian P.1992. “The Rise and Fall of British Emergentism.” Pp. 49–93 in Emergence or Reduction? Essays on the Prospects of Nonreductive Physicalism, edited by BeckermannA.FlohrH.KimJ.. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
57.
MeyerD. A.BrownT. A.1998. “Statistical Mechanics of Voting.”, Physical Review Letters81:1718–21.
58.
NémediDénes1995. “Collective Consciousness, Morphology, and Collective Representations: Durkheim's Sociology of Knowledge, 1894–1900.”, Sociological Perspectives38:41–56.
59.
ParsonsTalcott [1937] 1949. The Structure of Social Action.New York: Free Press.
60.
PickeringW. S. F.1984. Durkheim's Sociology of Religion.Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
61.
PorporaDouglas V.1993. “Cultural Rules and Material Relations.”, Sociological Theory11:212–29.
62.
PorterTheodore M.1995. “Statistical and Social Facts from Quetelet to Durkheim.”, Sociological Perspectives38:15–26.
63.
PrietulaMichael J.CarleyKathleen M.GasserLes, eds. 1998. Simulating Organizations: Computational Models of Institutions and Groups.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
64.
RawlsAnne Warfield1996. “Durkheim's Epistemology: The Neglected Argument.”, American Journal of Sociology102:430–82.
65.
ReynoldsCraig W.1987. “Flocks, Herds, and Schools: A Distributed Behavioral Model.”, Computer Graphics21:25–34.
66.
RosenbergAlex1997. “Reductionism Redux: Computing the Embryo.”, Biology and Philosophy12:445–70.
67.
SawyerR. Keith1999. “The Emergence of Creativity.”, Philosophical Psychology12:447–69.
68.
SawyerR. Keith“Nonreductive Individualism: Supervenience, Wild Disjunction, and Social Causation.”Philosophy of the Social Sciences..
69.
SchmausWarren1994. Durkheim's Philosophy of Science and the Sociology of Knowledge.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
70.
SchmausWarren1999. “Functionalism and the Meaning of Social Facts.”, Philosophy of Science66(proceedings): S314–S323.
71.
SteelsLuc1997. “The Synthetic Modeling of Language Origins.”, Evolution of Communication Journal1:1–34.
72.
StoneGregory P.FarbermanHarvey A.1967. “On the Edge of Rapprochement: Was Durkheim Moving toward the Perspective of Symbolic Interaction?”, Sociological Quarterly8:149–64.
73.
de TardeGabriel1969. On Communication and Social Influence: Selected Papers.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
74.
TurnerStephen P.1986. The Search for a Methodology of Social Science: Durkheim, Weber, and the Nineteenth- Century Problem of Cause, Probability, and Action.Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
75.
TurnerStephen P.1995. “Durkheim's The Rules of Sociological Method: Is It a Classic?”, Sociological Perspectives38:1–13.
76.
TurnerStephen P.1996. “Durkheim among the Statisticians.”, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences32:354–78.
77.
WalkerAdamWooldridgeMichael1995. “Understanding the Emergence of Conventions in Multi-Agent Systems.” Pp. 384–89 in ICMAS-95, edited by LesserV.. Cambridge: MIT Press.
