This article examines the difficulty of researching the intangibility of the future. Drawing on recent work on visual and sensory sociology, affect, and futurity, I propose that inventive methodologies provide some ways of grasping, understanding, and attuning to the future. To develop this argument, I pay close attention to the Children of Unquiet (2013–2014) film project by artist Mikhail Karikis, which involved Karikis working with children to probe the possible futures of a site that was once invested with hope and progress, but has since been depopulated. In turning to an art project, my intention is to examine the resonances between the project and some of the concerns of a sensory sociology of the future. In particular, I discuss the participation of children, and a conceptualization of hope as potentiality, open, affective and in the present. In conclusion, I explicate how the article seeks to contribute to a sensory sociology of the future by offering some indicative coordinates for this emerging field of research, including its involvement in creating conditions through which possible futures might be invented.
AdkinsL. (2014). Luc Boltanski and the problem of time: Notes towards a pragmatic sociology of the future. In SusenS.TurnerB.S. (Eds), The Spirit of Luc Boltanski: Essays on the Pragmatic Sociology of Critique (pp. 517–538). London: Athlone Press.
5.
AdkinsL.LuryC. (2009). Introduction: What is the empirical?European Journal of Social Theory, 12, 5–20.
6.
AdkinsL. (2016). Speculative futures in the time of debt. Sociological Review. Epub ahead of print 14December. DOI: 10.1111/1467–954X.12442.
7.
AndersonB. (2010). Preemption, precaution, preparedness: Anticipatory action and future geographies. Progress in Human Geography, 34, 777–798.
BerlantL. (2011). Cruel Optimism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
16.
BlackmanL.VennC. (2010). Affect. Body and Society, 16, 7–28.
17.
BrownN.MichaelM. (2003). A sociology of expectations: Retrospective prospects and prospecting retrospectives. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 15, 3–18.
18.
BurmanE.StaceyJ. (2010). The child and childhood in feminist theory. Feminist Theory, 12, 227–240.
19.
CastanedaC. (2002). Figurations: Child, Bodies, Worlds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
20.
ColemanR. (2012). Transforming Images: Screens, Affect, Futures. London and New York: Routledge.
21.
ColemanR. (2016a). Affect. In HooglandR. C. (Ed.), Gender: Sources, Perspectives, and Methodologies. Macmillan Interdisciplinary Handbooks: Gender (pp.15–26). Farmington Hills, MI: Macmillan.
22.
ColemanR. (2016b). Austerity futures: Debt, temporality and (hopeful) pessimism as an austerity mood. New Formations, 87, 83–101.
23.
ColemanR. (2017). Developing speculative methods to explore speculative shipping: Mail art, futurity, exchange. In RosengartenMarshaSavranskyMartinWilkieAlex (Eds), Speculative Research: The Lure of Possible Futures. London and New York: Routledge.
24.
ColemanR.Moreno FigueroaM. (2010). Past and future perfect? Beauty, affect and hope. Journal for Cultural Research, 14, 357–373.
25.
EdelmanL. (2004). No Future: Queer Theory and the Death Drive. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
26.
HardtM.KarikisM. (2014). In conversation about love. In Children of Unquiet: The Film, catalogue (pp. 8–23). London: future perfect.
27.
Hickey-MoodyA. (2013). Deleuze’s children. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 45, 272–286.
28.
IvinsonG.RenoldE. (2013). Subjectivity, affect and place: Thinking with Deleuze and Guattari’s body without organs to explore a young girl’s becomings in a post-industrial locale. Subjectivity, 6, 369–390.
29.
JamesA.ProutA. (1997). Re-repesenting childhood: Time and transition in the study of childhood. In JamesA.ProutA. (Eds), Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood. London and New York: Routledge.
30.
KarikisM. (2014). Preface. In Children of Unquiet: The Film, catalogue (pp. 4–7). London: future perfect.
31.
LawJ.UrryJ. (2004). Enacting the social. Economy and Society, 33, 390–410.
32.
LeeN. (2001). Childhood and Society. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
33.
LuryC.WakefordN. (2012). Introduction: A perpetual inventory. In LuryC.WakefordN. (Eds), Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social (pp. 1–24). London: Routledge.
34.
LyonD.CarabelliG. (2015). Researching young people’s orientations to the future: The methodological challenges of using arts practice. Qualitative Research, online first: 19May.
35.
ManiL. (2013). The Integral Nature of Things: Critical Reflections on the Present. London and New York: Routledge.
36.
MasonJ.DaviesK. (2009). Coming to our senses? A critical approach to sensory methodology. Qualitative Research, 9, 587–603.
