In this paper, I examine differences in political engagement among an elite segment of the British population: GBCS respondents who are college-educated, non-routine workers making over £100,000a year. I show that even though everyone in this group ought to have more than sufficient skills and resources for political engagement, there are still substantial differences by social position. Specifically, postgraduate degrees and higher incomes still differentiate political engagement, and cultural and social capital (as indicated by cultural activities practised, and the occupations people report knowing) differentiate elite political engagement even more strongly. This indicates that social position qua social position – that is, connection to dominant and legitimated ways of being – contributes to a sense of the ‘right to speak’ that matters as much as or more than costs and resources for facilitating political involvement.
AtkesonL. R., and RapoportR. B., (2003), ‘The more things change the more they stay the same: Examining gender differences in political attitude expression, 1952–2000’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 67 (4): 495–521. doi:10.1086/378961.
2.
BartelsL. M., (2008), Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
BerinskyA. J., (2005), ‘The Perverse Consequences of Electoral Reform in the United States’, American Politics Research, 33 (4): 471–491. doi:10.1177/1532673X04269419.
4.
BerinskyA. J.BurnsN. and TraugottM. W., (2001), ‘Who votes by mail? A dynamic model of the individual-level consequences of voting-by-mail systems’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 65 (2): 178–197. doi:10.1086/322196.
5.
BourdieuP., (1979), ‘Public opinion does not exist’, Communication and Class Struggle, 1: 124–130.
6.
BourdieuP., (1984), Distinction, trans. NiceR., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
BourdieuP., (1991), ‘Political representation: elements for a theory of the political field’, in Language and Symbolic Power, trans. ThompsonJohn B., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
BourdieuP., (1999), ‘Rethinking the state: genesis and structure of the bureaucratic field’, in State/Culture: State Formation after the Cultural Turn, 53–75. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
9.
BourdieuP., (2001), ‘The forms of capital’, The Sociology of Economic Life, 96–111.
10.
ClarkeH. D., and AcockA. C., (1989), ‘National elections and political attitudes: the case of political efficacy’, British Journal of Political Science19 (04): 551–562. doi:10.1017/S0007123400005639.
11.
CroteauD., (1995), Politics and the Class Divide: Working People and the Middle-Class Left, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
12.
DenverD.CarmanC. and JohnsR., (2012), Elections and Voters in Britain, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
13.
DuffB.HanmerM. J.ParkWon-Ho and WhiteI. K., (2007), ‘Good excuses: understanding who votes with an improved turnout question’, Public Opinion Quarterly71 (1): 67–90. doi:10.1093/poq/nfl045.
14.
GallegoA., (2007), ‘Unequal political participation in Europe’, International Journal of Sociology, 37 (4): 10–25. doi:10.2753/IJS0020-7659370401.
15.
GilensM., (2005), ‘Inequality and democratic responsiveness’, Public Opinion Quarterly69 (5): 778–796. doi:10.1093/poq/nfi058.
16.
GilensM., (2012), Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17.
HillK. Q., and HurleyP. A., (1984), ‘Nonvoters in voters’ clothing: the impact of voting behavior misreporting on voting behavior research’, Social Science Quarterly65 (1): 199–206.
18.
JonssonJ. O.GruskyD. B.Di CarloM.PollakR. and BrintonMary C., (2009), ‘Microclass mobility: social reproduction in four countries’, American Journal of Sociology, 114 (4): 977–1036. doi:10.1086/592200.
LaurisonD., (2013), ‘La production des opinions aux États-Unis, trente ans après La Distinction’, in CoulangeonP. and DuvalJ. (eds), Trente ans après La distinction de Pierre Bourdieu, Paris: Éditions la Découverte.
22.
LinN.FuY.-C. and HsungR.-M., (2001), ‘The position generator: measurement techniques for investigations of social capital’, Social Capital: Theory and Research, 57–81, New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
23.
LongJ. S., and FreeseJ., (2006), Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata.StataCorp LP.
24.
MilliganK.MorettiE. and OreopoulosP., (2004), ‘Does education improve citizenship? Evidence from the United States and the United Kingdom’, Journal of Public Economics, 88 (9-10):1667–1695. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2003.10.005.
25.
PattieCSeydP. and WhiteleyP., (2003), ‘Citizenship and civic engagement: attitudes and behaviour in Britain’, Political Studies51 (3): 443–468. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.00435.
26.
PivenF. F., and ClowardR. A., (2000), Why Americans Still Don't Vote: And Why Politicians Want it that Way, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
27.
SavageM.DevineF.CunninghamN.TaylorM.LiY.HjellbrekkeJ.Le RouxB.FriedmanS., and MilesA., (2013), ‘A new model of social class? Findings from the BBC's Great British Class Survey experiment’, Sociology, published online 2 April, http://soc.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/03/12/0038038513481128.
28.
SchlozmanK. L.VerbaS. and BradyH. E., (2012), The Unheavenly Chorus: Unequal Political Voice and the Broken Promise of American Democracy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29.
VerbaS.SchlozmanK. L. and BradyH. E., (1995), Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
WeedenK. A. and GruskyD. B., (2005), ‘The case for a new class map’, American Journal of Sociology, 111 (1): 141–212.
