This paper addresses moderation in the context of an immoderate populist politics and claims that social integration requires inculcation in the values of a dominant culture, especially by those perceived as originating from outside the political community. The paper argues, instead, for a deep pluralism and for the idea of multiculturalism as friendship and the means of securing moderation in public debate. In making these arguments, it draws upon the pragmatist approach of John Dewey and the significance of his idea of a ‘public’ and on the work of Danielle Allen and her idea of political friendship. The paper concludes with the argument that political friendship requires motivation and that this will be secured by an orientation toward social justice.
AllenD. S., (2004), Talking to Strangers: Anxieties of Citizenship since Brown v Board of Education, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
AndersonE., (2011), The Cosmopolitan Canopy: Race and Civility in Everyday Life, New York: W.W. Norton.
3.
BramsonL., (1961), The Political Uses of Sociology, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4.
BrowneJ. and LevellP., (2010), ‘The distributional effect of tax and benefit reforms to be introduced between June 2010 and April 2014: a revised assessment’, Institute of Fiscal Studies Briefing Note 108, Available at: www.ifs.org.uk/bns/bn108.pdf (accessed 1 May 2013).
De LucaT., (1995), Two Faces of Political Apathy, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
7.
DeweyJ., (1954 [1927]), The Public and its Problems, Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.
8.
DeweyJ., (1972 [1896]), ‘The reflex arc concept in psychology’, in BoydstonJ. A. (ed.), John Dewey, The Early Works. Volume 5: 1929. The Quest for Certainty, 96–109, Carbondale and Edwardsville, IL: Southern Illinois Press.
9.
DurkheimE., (1957), Professional Ethics and Civic Morals, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
10.
GoodhartD., (2013), The British Dream: Successes and Failures of Post-war Immigration, London: Atlantic Books.
11.
GuggenheimM. and NowotnyH., (2003), ‘Joy in repetition makes the future disappear: a critical assessment of the present state of STs’, in BernwardJ. and NowotnyH. (eds), Social Studies of Science and Technology: Looking Back, Ahead, 229–258, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
12.
HayC., (2007), Why We Hate Politics, Cambridge: Polity Press.
LivingstonJ., (1994), Pragmatism and the Political Economy of Cultural Revolution, 1850–1940, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
17.
LivingstonJ., (2001), Pragmatism, Feminism and Democracy: Rethinking the Politics of American History, New York: Routledge.
18.
MarshallT. H., (1950), ‘Citizenship and social class’, in MarshallT. H., Citizenship and Social Class and Other Essays, 1–85, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
MeadG. H., (1964 [1913]), ‘The social self’, in ReckA. J. (ed.), Selected Writings: George Herbert Mead, 142–149, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
20.
MuddeC., (2007), Popular Radical Right Parties in Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
NiskanenW. A., (1971), Bureaucracy and Representative Government, Chicago, IL: Aldine-Atherton.
22.
OlsonM., (1982), The Rise and Decline of Nations, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
23.
PoggeT. (ed.), (2001), Global Justice, Oxford: Blackwell.
24.
PolanyiK., (1944), The Great Transformation, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
25.
RawlsJ., (1971), A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
SchulzB., (2009), ‘Obama's political philosophy: pragmatism, politics and the University of Chicago’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 39 (2): 127–173.
27.
TurnerS., (2001), ‘What is the problem with experts?’Social Studies of Science, 31 (1): 123–149.
28.
WallasG., (1936 [1914]), The Great Society: A Psychological Analysis, London: Macmillan.
29.
WestE., (2013), The Diversity Illusion: What We Got Wrong about Immigration and How to Set it Right, London: Gibson Square Books.
