The aim of this paper is to suggest how the material turn in sociology could benefit from a re-theorizing around wider understandings of disposal. The argument is that it is not enough to document how spaces for dwelling are produced and consumed; their building and use also entail a disposal of place that has to account for how the materials that make up a dwelling get arranged and ‘placed’ as moralities. Taking spaces for living and eating as its object of analysis, each section of this paper examines a different aspect of modernity, bringing the kitchen-diner ‘front stage’. Avoiding a ubiquitous conflation of disposal with waste – whereby ‘excess’ is dismissed out of hand as redundant and non-productive to design – the analysis goes on to suggest how modernity advances its orders through our making the ‘belongings’ of collective identity more detachable and by our thinning the ‘stickiness’ of cultural institutions.
AppaduraiA. (ed.), (1986), The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
AshbyR., (1956), An Introduction to Cybernetics, London: Chapman and Hall.
3.
BarnesB., (1988), The Nature of Power, Cambridge: Polity Press.
4.
BarthesR., (1972), Mythologies, trans. LaversAnnette, New York: Noonday Press.
5.
BaumanZ., (2004), Wasted Lives: Modernity and its Outcasts, Cambridge: Polity Press.
6.
BeckerH. S., (1993), ‘How I learned what a crock was’, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 22 (1): 28–35.
7.
BittnerE., (1967), ‘The police on skid-row: A study of peace keeping’, American Sociological Review, 32 (5): 699–717.
8.
BlumA., (2003), The Imaginative Structure of the City. Canada: McGill-Queen's University Press.
9.
BourdieuP., (1986), Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, trans. NiceRichard, London: Blackwell.
10.
CappelliniB., (2010), ‘The culture of the meal: Class, family and time in the everyday consumption of Italian cuisine’, PhD thesis, University of Keele.
11.
CarnegieD., (1936), How to Win Friends and Influence People, New York: Simon and Schuster.
12.
CooperT., (2005), ‘Slower consumption: Reflections on product life spans and the “throwaway society”’, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9 (1–2): 51–67.
13.
CsikzentmihalyiM. and Rochberg-HaltonE., (1981), The Meaning of Things, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
DelantyG., (2012), ‘a cosmopolitan approach to the explanation of social change’, The Sociological Review, 60 (4): 333–354.
15.
DouglasM., (1966), Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo, London: Routledge.
16.
DouglasM., (1975), Implicit Meanings: Essays in Anthropology, London: Routledge.
17.
EliasN., (1969), The Civilizing Process, in Vol. I, The History of Manners, Oxford: Blackwell.
18.
EliasN., (1982), The Civilizing Process, in Vol. II, State Formation and Civilization, Oxford: Blackwell.
19.
GarfinkelH., (1967), Studies in Ethnomethodology, Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
20.
GiddensA., (1984), The Constitution of Society, Cambridge: Polity Press.
21.
GoffmanE., (1959), The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, New York: Doubleday.
22.
GoffmanE., (1972), Relations in Public, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
23.
GregsonN.MetcalfeA. and CreweL., (2007), ‘Identity, mobility, and the throwaway society’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 25 (4): 682–700.
24.
HawkinsG., (2000), ‘Plastic bags: Living with rubbish’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 4: 5–23.
25.
HawkinsG., (2006), The Ethics of Waste: How We Relate to Rubbish, Sydney: UNSW Press.
HetheringtonK., (2004), ‘Secondhandedness: Consumption, disposal, and absent presence’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32: 157–173.
29.
HochschildA., (2012), The Outsourced Self: Intimate Life in Market Times, New York: Metropolitan Books.
30.
HughesJ., (2011), BBC report on the Human Metabolic clinic, University Hospital Coventry and the University of Warwick, available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-15447568.
31.
JamesH., (1960 [1904]), The Ambassadors, New York: Signet.
32.
JefferyR., (1979), ‘Normal rubbish: Deviant patients in casualty departments’, Sociology of Health and Illness, 1 (1): 90–107.
33.
LatimerJ., (2000), The Conduct of Care, Oxford: Blackwell.
34.
LatimerJ. and MunroR., (2006), ‘Driving the social’, in BohmS.JonesC.LandC. and PattersonM. (eds), Against Automobility, Sociological Review Monograph, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35.
LatimerJ. and MunroR., (2009), ‘Keeping and dwelling: Relational extension, the idea of the home, and otherness’, Space and Culture, 12: 317–331.
36.
LeachR., (2002), ‘What happened at home with art: Tracing the experience of consumers?’, in PainterC. (ed.), Contemporary Art and the Home, 153–180, Oxford: Berg.
37.
LennoxC., (1989 [1752]), The Female Quixote (or The Adventures of Arabella), New York: Oxford University Press.
MarshallD., (1990), ‘A study of the behavioural variables influencing consumer acceptability of fish and fish products’, PhD thesis, University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne.
40.
MillerD., (2008), The Comfort of Things: The Objects of our Affection, Cambridge: Polity Press.
41.
MunroR., (1995), ‘Disposal of the meal’, in MarshallD. (ed.), Food Choice and the Food Consumer, 313–325, Glasgow: Blackie.
42.
MunroR., (1996), ‘The consumption view of self’, in EdgellS.HetheringtonK. and WardeA. (eds), Consumption Matters, Sociological Review Monograph, Oxford: Blackwell.
43.
MunroR., (1998), ‘Disposal of the X gap: The production and consumption of accounting research and practical accounting systems’, Advances in Public Interest Accounting, 7: 139–159.
44.
MunroR., (1999), ‘Power and discretion: Membership work in the time of technology’, Organization, 6 (3): 429–450.
45.
MunroR., (2001), ‘Calling for accounts: Numbers, monsters and membership, The Sociological Review, 46 (4): 473–493.
46.
MunroR., (2004), ‘Punctualising identity: Time and the demanding relation’, Sociology, 38 (2): 293–311.
47.
MunroR. (with R. Collins), (2010), ‘Exploring the sociological re-imagining of politics’, The Sociological Review, 58 (4): 548–562.
48.
NaipaulV. S., (1957), The Mystic Masseur, London: Andre Deutsch.
49.
O'BrienM., (1999), ‘Rubbish power: Towards a sociology of the rubbish society’, in HearnJ. and RoseneilS. (eds), Consuming Cultures, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
50.
SahlinsM., (2000), Culture in Practice: Selected Essays, New York: Zone Books.
51.
ShawD. and NewholmT., (2002), ‘Voluntary simplicity and the ethics of consumption’, Psychology and Marketing, 19 (2): 167–185.
52.
ShieldsR. (ed.), (1992), Lifestyle Shopping: The Subject of Consumption. London: Routledge.
53.
ShillingC., (2008), Changing Bodies: Habits, Crisis and Creativity, London: Sage.
54.
ShillingC. and MellorP. A., (2001), ‘Durkheim, morality and modernity: Collective effervescence, homo duplex and the sources of moral action’, reprinted in PickeringW. S. F. (ed.), Emile Durkheim III. Critical Assessments, London: Routledge.
55.
SimmelG., (1972), On Individuality and Social Forms, edited and with an introduction by DLevineOnald, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
56.
StrathernM., (1991), Partial Connections, Savage, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
57.
StrathernM., (1993), ‘Society in drag’, Times Higher Educational Supplement, 2 April.
58.
StrathernM., (1996), ‘Cutting the network’, The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 2 (3): 517–535.
59.
StrathernM., (1999), ‘The aesthetics of substance’, in Property, Substance and Effect, 45–64, London: Athlone.
60.
StrongP., (2010), ‘Open to suggestion: Ordering, risk and invention in community mental health care’, PhD thesis, Goldsmiths College, University of London.
61.
TampubolonG., (2010), ‘Social stratification and cultures hierarchy among the omnivores’, The Sociological Review, 58: 1–25.
62.
TaussigM., (1999), Defacement: Public Secrecy and the Labor of the Negative, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
63.
ThompsonM., (1979), Rubbish Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
64.
UrryJ., (2002), The Tourist Gaze, 2nd edn, London: Sage.
