This paper maps the biography of a new media product as a way of exploring how a network society is emerging. While Castells identifies the importance of the spirit of informationalism, he leaves the ethics of this culture relatively under-developed. Focusing on the development of a computer game for employee training purposes, the paper argues that some of the characteristics of play – its holding or hooking power, its ability to break down the distinction between pretence and belief, and its role in the development of gaming skills – may be relevant here. It further suggests that play has the potential to contribute to divisions as well as to diversions, and in this way contribute to the dis-embedding and re-embedding of individuals, and to changes in relations of power and inequality.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdkinsL., (2000), ‘Objects of innovation; post-occupational reflexivity’ in AhmedS.KilbyJ.LuryC.McNeilM. and SkeggsB. (eds), Transformations: Thinking Through Feminism, London and New York: Routledge: 259–272.
2.
AppaduraiA., (ed.), (1986), The Social Life of Things, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
BeckU., (1992), The Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, London: Sage.
5.
BronsonP., (1999), ‘Fast times in Silicon Valley’, Life. The Observer Magazine, 1 August: 10–18.
6.
CaseyC., (1995), Work, Self and Society: After Industrialization, London: Routledge.
7.
CastellsM., (1996), The Rise of the Network Society, Cambridge, Mass. and Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
8.
de CerteauM., (1988), The Practices of Everyday Life, Berkeley and Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.
9.
du GayP., (1996), Consumption and Identity at Work, London: Sage.
10.
DanetB., (2001), Cyberpl@y. Communicating Online, Oxford and New York: Berg.
11.
GadamerH.-G., (1993), The Relevance of the Beautiful and Other Essays, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
GiddensA., (1991), Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, Cambridge: Polity Press.
13.
GrabherG., (2001), ‘Ecologies of creativity: the Village, the Group and the heterarchic organization of the British advertising industry’, Environment and Planning A, vol. 33: 351–374.
14.
GrabherG.StarkD., (1997), ‘Organizing diversity: evolutionary theory, network analysis and post-socialism’, in GrabherG. and StarkD. (eds), Restructuring Networks in Post-socialism: Legacies, Linkages and Localities, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 1–32.
15.
GoffmanE., (1961), Encounters: Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill Educational Publishing.
16.
HuizingaJ., (1950), Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play Element in Culture, London: The Beacon Press.
17.
KnightsD. and WillmottH., (1999), Management Lives. Power and Identity in Work Organizations, London: Sage.
18.
Knorr CetinaK., (2000), ‘Postsocial theory’ in RitzerG. and SmartB. (eds), Handbook of Social Theory, London: Sage.
19.
LatourB., (1999), ‘On recalling ANT’ in LawJ. and HassardJ. (eds), Actor Network Theory and After, Oxford: Blackwell: 15–25.
20.
ManovichL., (2001), The Language of New Media, New York: The MIT Press.
McDowellL., (1997), Capital Culture: Gender at Work in the City, Oxford: Blackwell.
23.
MillerD., (1986), Material Culture and Mass Consumption, Oxford: Blackwell.
24.
PeirceC.S., (1991), Peirce on Signs, (ed.) HoopesJ., Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
25.
PineJ. and GilmoreJ.H., (1999), The Experience Economy. Work is Theatre and Every Business a Stage, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
26.
SchrageM., (2000), Serious Play. How the World's Best Companies Simulate to Innovate, Boston: Harvard Business School.
27.
SennettR., (1998), The Corrosion of Character. The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism, New York and London: W.W. Norton and Company.
28.
StallabrassJ., (1996), Gargantua: Manufactured Mass Culture, London and New York: Verso.
29.
StarkD., (1999), ‘Heterarchy: distributed authority and organizing of diversity’, in ClippingerJ.H. (ed.), The Biology of Business, San Francisco: Josey-Bass: 153–181.
30.
ThriftN., (1997), ‘The rise of soft capitalism’, Cultural Values, 1: 29–57.
31.
ThriftN., (2000), ‘Performing cultures in the new economy’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90 (4): 674–692.
32.
ThriftN., (2001), ‘“It's the romance, not the finance that makes the business worth pursuing”: disclosing a new market culture’, Economy and Society, vol. 30, no. 4: 412–432.
33.
TurkleS., (1996), Life on the Screen, New York: Wiedenfeld and Nicholson.
34.
WienersB., (1999), ‘Pass it on’, Wired, July: 60.
35.
WilliamsK., (2001), ‘Business as usual’, Economy and Society, vol. 30, no. 4: 399–411.
36.
WittelA.LuryC. and LashS., (in press), ‘Real and virtual connectivity: new media in London’ in WoolgarS. (ed.), Virtual Society? Get Real!, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
