The present study set out to use qualitative interviews in an effort to understand why young people from highly educated groups, especially from ‘non-productive’ sectors of the economy (public services, teaching, etc.), are found to have a relatively strong affinity to the environmental movement. Young people aged 15–20, who were members of organizations associated with the protection of or use of nature, were interviewed. In conclusion, we suggest that to some extent the class differences can be interpreted in the light of forms of symbolic inclusions and exclusions. There are a number of ‘symbolic fences’ that working-class youngsters have to cross in order to become members of an environmental organization. These fences are related to: the style and cultural identity of the members, expectations of a sort of self-enclosure as part of participation in the organization, the somewhat androgynous gender-identity of the members, the perceptions of nature that are dominant among the members and the organization's intellectual image.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeckU., (1992), Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, London: Sage Publications.
2.
NielsenH. BjerrumRudbergM., (1989), Historien om gutter og jenter. Kjønnssosialisering i et utviklingspsykologisk perspektiv, Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
3.
BourdieuP., (1977), Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge: University Press.
4.
BourdieuP., (1984), Distinction. A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, London: Routledge.
5.
BourdieuP., (1990), The Logic of Practice, Cambridge: Polity Press.
6.
BourdieuP., (1993), Den kritiske ettertanke. Grunnlag for samfunnsanalyse, Oslo: Det Norske Samlaget.
7.
BourdieuP., (1997), ‘The forms of capital’, in HalseyLauderBrownWells, Education, Culture, Eeconomy and Society. Oxford: University Press.
DunlapR.MertigA., (1994), ‘Global Environmental Concern: A Challenge to the Post-Materialism Thesis’, in EstetP.SchluterW., (eds) Social Dimensions of Contemporary Environmental Issues, Tilburg: Tilburg University press.
12.
EckersleyR., (1989), Green politics and the new class: Selfishness or virtue?Political studies, 2: 205–223.
13.
EderK., (1993), The New Politics of Class. Social Movements and Cultural Dynamics in Advanced Societies, London: Sage.
14.
EderK., (1996), The Social Construction of Nature, London: Sage.
15.
ElsterJ., (1983), Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
ElsterJ., (1989), The Cement of Society: A Study of Social Order, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
FurlongA.CartmelF., (1997), Young people and social change. Individualisation and risk in late modernity, Buckingham: Open University Press.
18.
GouldnerA., (1979), The Future of Intellectuals and the Rise of the New Class, New York: The Seabury Press.
19.
HaavindH., (1985), Endringer i forholdene mellom kvinner og menn. Materialisten1985, 4.
20.
IsachsenT.ØiaT.VestelV.HeggK., (1999), Ungdomstiltak i større bysamfunn – En evaluering, NOVA Rapport 9/99.
21.
JahnD., (1996), The Colors of the Green Rainbow: Ideology, Strategy and Action of Members of Environmental Organisations in Norway, Bergen: LOS-senter, Notat 9643.
22.
KrangeI., (1996), ‘Hvor edel er jeg egentlig?’: En studie av motivasjon for aktiv deltakelse i Oslo Natur og Ungdom, Hovedoppgave i sosiologi – Universitetet i Oslo.
23.
KriesiH., (1989), ‘New social movements and the new class in the Netherlands’, American Journal of Peasant Studies, 20: 389–419.
MayC.CooperA., (1995), Personal identity and Social change: Some theoretical considerations, Acta Sociologica, 38: 75–85.
26.
MelucciA., (1989), Nomads of the present: Social movements and individual needs in contemporary society, edited by KeaneJohnMierPaul. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
27.
MelucciA., (1996a), Challenging Codes. Collective Action in the Information Age, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
MelucciA., (1996b), ‘Youth, time and social movements’, Young – Nordic Journal of Youth Research, 4 (2): 3–14.
29.
NæssA., (1973), ‘The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement: A summary’, Inquiry, 16: 95–100.
30.
PetersonA.ThörnH., (1994), ‘Social movements as communicative praxis: A case study of the Plowshares movement’, Young – Nordic Journal of Youth Research, nr.2, volume 2: 17–36.
31.
PrieurA., (1998), ‘Forholdet mellom kjønn og klasse med utgangspunkt i Bourdieus sosiologi’. Sosiologisk tidsskrift, Nr. 1–2, Årgang 6.
32.
RoseF., (1997), ‘Toward a class-cultural theory of social movements: Reinterpreting new social movements’, Sociological forum, Vol. 12, nr.3: 461–494.
33.
ScottA., (1990), Ideology and The New Social Movements, London: Unwin Hyman.
SkogenK., (1998), ‘A touch of class: The persistence of class cultures among Norwegian youth’, Young – Nordic Journal of Youth Research, 6 (2): 15–37.
36.
SkogenK., (1999a), ‘Another look at culture and nature: How culture patterns influence environmental orientation among Norwegian youth’, Acta Sociologica, 42: 223–139.
37.
SkogenK., (1999b), Cultures and Natures. Cultural patterns, Environmental orientations and Outdoor recreation Practices among Norwegian Youth. (Dr. thesis) Nova-rapport 16/99. Oslo: Norsk institutt for forskning om oppvekst, velferd og aldring.
38.
SkogenK., (2001), ‘Who's afraid of the big, bad wolf? Young people's responses to the conflicts over large carnivores in eastern Norway’, Rural Sociology, Vol. 66, nr.2: 203–226.
39.
StrandbuÅ.SkogenK., (2000), 'Environmentalism among Norwegian youth – different paths to attitudes and action?Journal of Youth Studies, Volume 3, Number 2.
40.
StrandbuÅ., (2000), Storbyungdom og natur. Nova-rapport 14/00, Oslo: Norsk institutt for forskning om oppvekst, velferd og aldring.
41.
TouraineA., (1981), The Voice and the Eye, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
TouraineA., (1987), Social movements: Participation and Protest. Scandinavian Political Studies, Vol. 10, No. 3.
43.
WillisP., (1977), Learning to Labour: How Working Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs, Aldershot: Gower Publishing.
