Abstract

Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Carrington
P.
Jones
T.
. 1996 . “Reluctant Experts.”
Law and Contemporary Problems
59 :51 –63 .
2.
Cecil
J.
Wetherington
G. T.
. 1996 . “Foreward.”
Law and Contemporary Problems
59 :1 –5 .
3.
Crabb
B.
1996 . “Judicially Compelled Disclosure of Researchers' Data: A Judge's View.”
Law and Contemporary Problems
59 :9 –30 .
4.
Strong
J. W.
1992 . McCormick on Evidence (4th ed. ). St. Paul, MN : West .
5.
Traynor
M.
1996 . “Countering the Excessive Subpoena for Scholarly Research.”
Law and Contemporary Problems
59 :119 –32 .
6.
Wiggins
E.
McKenna
J.
1996 . “Researchers' Reactions to Compelled Disclosure of Scientific Information.”
Law and Contemporary Problems
59 :67 –82 .
7.Atlantic Sugar Ltd . v. United States , 85 Customs Court 128 (1980 ).
8.Branzburg v. Hayes , 408 U. S. 665 (1972 ).
9.Cohen v. Cowles Media Co ., 501 U.S. 663 (1991 ).
10.Dow Chemical Co . v. Allen , 672 F.2d 1262 (7th Cir. 1982 ).
11.Farnsworth v. Proctor and Gamble Co ., 758 F.2d 1545 (11th Cir. 1985 ).
12.
In re Grand Jury Subpoena Dated January 4, 1984 , 750 F.2d 223 (2d Cir. 1984 ).
13.Lampshire v. Proctor and Gamble Co ., 94 F.R.D. 58 (N.D. Ga. 1982 ).
