On the basis of a functional perspective, we hypothesized that negative stimuli are detected faster than positive stimuli. In Experiment 1, participants were subliminally presented with positive and negative words or with no words at all. After each presentation, participants were asked whether they had seen a word. They detected negative words more accurately than positive words. In Experiment 2, participants were subliminally presented with negative or positive words. After each presentation, they were asked whether the presented word was positive or negative. Negative words were correctly categorized more often than positive words. Experiment 3 showed that although participants correctly categorized negative words more often than positive words, they could not guess the meaning of the words better than would be expected by chance. The results are discussed against the background of recent findings on basic affective processes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarghJ.A.ChaikenS.GovenderR.PrattoF. (1992). The generality of the automatic evaluation effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 893–912.
2.
BarghJ.A.ChaikenS.RaymondP.HymesC. (1996). The automatic evaluation effect: Unconditional automatic attitude activation with a pronunciation task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 104–128.
3.
BarghJ.A.LittJ.PrattoF.SpielmanL.A. (1989). On the preconscious evaluation of social stimuli. InBennettA.F.McConkeyK.M.(Eds.),Cognition in individual and social contexts: Proceedings of the XXV International Congress of Psychology(pp.357–370).Amsterdam: Elsevier.
4.
BlumG.S. (1954). An experimental reunion of psychoanalytic theory with perceptual vigilance and defense. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49, 94–98.
5.
BootzinR.R.NatsoulasT. (1965). Evidence for perceptual defense uncontaminated by response bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 461–468.
6.
BroadbentD.E.GregoryM. (1967). Perception of emotionally toned words. Nature, 215, 581–584.
7.
CacioppoJ.T.CritesS.L.Jr.BerntsonG.G.ColesM.G.H. (1993). If attitudes affect how stimuli are processed, should they not affect the event-related brain potential? Psychological Science, 4, 108–112.
8.
CacioppoJ.T.GardnerW.L.BerntsonG.G. (1999). The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components: Form follows function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 839–855.
9.
DarwinC. (1996). The origin of species. New York: Gramercy. (Original work published 1859)
10.
DavidsonR.J.EkmanP.SaronR.D.SenulisJ.A.FriesenW.V. (1990). Approach-withdrawal and cerebral asymmetry: Emotional expression and brain physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 330–341.
11.
De HouwerJ.BaeyensF.EelenP. (1994). Verbal conditioning with undetected US presentations. Behavior Research and Therapy, 32, 629–633.
12.
De HouwerJ.HermansD.SpruytA. (2001). Affective priming of pronunciation responses: Effects of target degradation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 85–91.
13.
EriksenC.W. (1963). Perception and personality. InWepmanJ.M.Heine.R.W.(Eds.),Concepts of personality(pp.31–62).Chicago: Aldine.
14.
FazioR.H. (2001). On the automatic activation of associated evaluations: An overview. Cognition and Emotion, 15, 115–141.
15.
FazioR.H.SanbonmatsuD.M.PowellM.C.KardesF.R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229–238.
16.
GlaserJ.BanajiM.R. (1999). When fair is foul and foul is fair: Reverse priming in automatic evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 669–687.
HansenC.H.HansenR.D. (1988). Finding the face in the crowd: An anger superiority effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 917–924.
19.
HermansD.De HouwerJ.EelenP. (1994). The affective priming effect: Automatic activation of evaluative information in memory. Cognition and Emotion, 8515–533.
20.
KitayamaS. (1990). Interaction between affect and cognition in word perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 209–217.
21.
KlauerK.C. (1998). Affective priming. European Review of Social Psychology, 8, 63–107.
22.
KlauerK.C.RossnagelC.MuschJ. (1997). List-context effects in evaluative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 246–255.
23.
LeDouxJ. (1996). The emotional brain. New York: Simon & Schuster.
24.
MarcelA.J. (1983). Conscious and unconscious perception: An approach to the relations between phenomenal experience and perceptual processes. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 238–300.
25.
McGinniesE.M. (1949). Emotionality and perceptual defense. Psychological Review, 56, 471–482.
26.
MurphyS.ZajoncR. (1993). Affect, cognition and awareness: Affective priming with suboptimal and optimal stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 723–729.
27.
ÖhmanA.WiensS. (2001, June). The concept of an evolved fear module as a challenge to cognitive theories of anxiety. Paper presented at Feelings and Emotions: The Amsterdam Symposium, Amsterdam.
28.
PrattoF.JohnO.P. (1991). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of negative social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 380–391.
29.
WenturaD.RothermundK.BakP. (2000). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of approach- and avoidance-related social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1024–1037.
30.
WilliamsJ.M.G.MatthewsA.MacLeodC. (1996). The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 3–24.
31.
ZajoncR.B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monographs, 9(Pt. 2), 1–27.
