To understand negative numbers, must we refer to positive number representations (the phylogenetic hypothesis), or do we acquire a negative mental number line (the ontogenetic hypothesis)? In the experiment reported here, participants made lateralized button responses to indicate the larger of two digits from the range -9 to 9. Digit pairs were displayed spatially congruent or incongruent with either a phylogenetic or an ontogenetic mental number line. The pattern of decision latencies suggests that negative numbers become associated with left space, thus supporting the ontogenetic view.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BächtoldD.BaumüllerM.BruggerP. (1998). Stimulus-response compatibility in representational space. Neuropsychologia, 36, 731–735.
2.
BerchD.B.FoleyE.J.HillR.J.RyanP.M. (1999). Extracting parity and magnitude from Arabic numerals: Developmental changes in number processing and mental representation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 74, 286–308.
3.
BrannonE.M.WusthoffC.J.GallistelC.R.GibbonJ. (2001). Numerical subtraction in the pigeon: Evidence for a linear subjective number scale. Psychological Science, 12, 238–243.
4.
BuckleyP.B.GillmanC.B. (1974). Comparison of digits and dot patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 1131–1136.
5.
DehaeneS. (1997). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics. New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
DehaeneS. (2000). Cerebral bases of number processing and calculation. In: GazzanigaM.(Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences (pp.987–998). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7.
DehaeneS. (2001a). Precis of The Number Sense. Mind and Language, 16 (1), 16–36.
DehaeneS.BossiniS.GirauxP. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371–396.
10.
DehaeneS.SpelkeE.PinelP.StanescuR.TsivkinS. (1999). Sources of mathematical thinking: Behavioural and brain imaging evidence. Science, 284, 970–974.
11.
FiasW.BrysbaertM.GeypensF.d'YdewalleG. (1996). The importance of magnitude information in numerical processing: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Mathematical Cognition, 2 (1), 95–110.
12.
FiasW.LammertynJ.ReynvoetB.DupontP.OrbanG.A. (in press). Parietal representation of symbolic and non-symbolic magnitude. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
GallistelC.R.GelmanR. (2000). Non-verbal numerical cognition: From reals to integers. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 44 (2), 59–64.
15.
GoebelS.WalshV.RushworthM.F.S. (2001). The mental number line and the human angular gyyrus. NeuroImage, 14, 1278–1289.
16.
HinesT.M. (1990). An odd effect: Lengthened reaction times for judgments about odd digits. Memory & Cognition, 18, 40–46.
17.
LorchR.F.MyersJ.L. (1990). Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognition research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 149–157.
18.
PeledI.MukhopadhyayS.ResnickL.B. (1988, November). Formal and informal sources of mental models for negative numbers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Chicago.
19.
RestleF. (1970). Speed of adding and comparing numbers. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 274–278.
