People are often expected to make decisions based on all of the relevant information, weighted and combined appropriately. Under many conditions, however, people use heuristic strategies that depart from this ideal. I tested the ability of two models to predict bail decisions made by judges in two courts. In both courts, a simple heuristic proved to be a better predictor of judicial decisions than a more complex model that instantiated the principles of due process. Specifically, judges were “passing the buck” because they relied on decisions made by the police, prosecution, and previous bench. Problematically, these earlier decisions were not significantly related to case characteristics. These findings have implications for the types of models researchers use to capture professional decision-making policies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrehmerA.BrehmerB. (1988). What have welearned about human judgment from thirty years of policycapturing?In: BrehmerB.JoyceC.R.B.(Eds.),Humanjudgment: The SJT view(pp. 75–114.). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
2.
CosmidesL.ToobyJ. (1996). Are humans goodintuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment underuncertainty. Cognition, 58, 1–73.
3.
DaviesC. (1971). Pre-trial imprisonment: A Liverpoolstudy. British Journal of Criminology, 11, 32–48.
4.
DeshpandeS.P.SchoderbekP.P. (1993). Pay-allocationsby managers: A policy-capturing approach. Human Relations, 46, 465–479.
5.
DhamiM.K.AytonP. (1998, November). Legal decisionmaking the fast and frugal way. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Judgment and Decision Making, Dallas, TX.
6.
DhamiM.K.AytonP. (2001). Bailing andjailing the fast and frugal way. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 14, 141–168.
7.
DhamiM.K.HarriesC. (2001). Fast and frugalversus regression models of human judgment. Thinking and Reasoning, 7, 5–27.
8.
EbbesenE.B.KonecniV.J. (1975). Decision makingand information integration in the courts: The setting of bail. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 805–821.
9.
EinhornH.J. (1970). The use of nonlinear, noncompensatory models in decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 73, 221–230.
10.
EstesW.K. (1994). Classification and cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
GigerenzerG.GoldsteinD. (1996). Reasoning thefast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103, 650–669.
12.
GigerenzerG.ToddP.M., &the ABC Research Group. (Eds.).(1999). Simple heuristics that make ussmart. New York: Oxford University Press.
13.
Gonzalez-VallejoC.SorumP.C.StewartT.R.ChessareJ.B.MumpowerJ.L. (1998). Physicians' diagnostic judgments and treatment decisionsfor acute otitis media in children. Medical Decision Making, 18, 149–162.
KlaymanJ.HaY. (1987). Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information inhypothesis testing. Psychological Review, 94, 211–228.
18.
LipshitzR. (2000). Two cheers for bounded rationality[Commentary]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 756.
19.
NisbettR.RossL. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
20.
OgilvieJ.R.SchmittN. (1979). Situationalinfluences on linear and nonlinear use of information. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23, 292–306.
21.
PackerH.L. (1968). The limits of the criminalsanction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
22.
PayneJ.W.BettmanJ.R.JohnsonE.J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge,England: Cambridge University Press.
23.
PhelpsR.H.ShanteauJ. (1978). Livestock judges: How much information can an expert use?Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 21, 209–219.
24.
RieskampJ.HoffrageU. (1999). When do peopleuse simple heuristics, and how can we tell?In: GigerenzerG.ToddP.M.the ABC Research Group(Eds.),Simpleheuristics that make us smart(pp.141–167.). New York: Oxford University Press.
WallerW.S. (1988). Brunswikian research in accounting andauditing. In: BrehmerB.JoyceC.R.B.(Eds.),Human judgment: The SJT view(pp. 247–272.). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
27.
WeldonE.GarganoG.M. (1985). Cognitive effortin additive task groups: The effects of shared responsibility on the qualityof multiattribute judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36, 348–361.
28.
WigtonR.S. (1996). Social judgment theory and medicaljudgment. Thinking and Reasoning, 2, 175–190.
