We propose an approach that allows a rigorous understanding of the visual categorization and recognition process without asking direct questions about unobservable memory representations. Our approach builds on the selective use of visual information in recognition and a new method (Bubbles) to depict and measure what this information is. We examine three face-recognition tasks (identity, gender, expressive or not) and establish the componential and holistic information responsible for recognition performance. On the basis of this information, we derive task-specific gradients of probability for the allocation of attention to the different regions of the face.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AhumadaA.J.LovellJ. (1971). Stimulus features in signal detection. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49, 1751–1756.
2.
ArchambaultA.O'DonnellC.SchynsP.G. (1999). Blind to object changes: When learning one object at different levels of categorization modifies its perception. Psychological Science, 10, 249–255.
BiedermanI. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115–147.
5.
BiedermanI.CooperE.E. (1991). Priming contour-deleted images: Evidence for intermediate representations in visual object recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 393–419.
6.
BrainardD.H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436.
7.
BrownR. (1958). How shall a thing be called?Psychological Review, 65, 14–21.
8.
BülthoffH.H.EdelmanS. (1992). Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view theory of object recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 89, 60–64.
9.
BurtD.M.PerrettD.I. (1997). Perceptual asymmetries in judgements of facial attractiveness, age, gender, speech and expression. Neuropsychologia, 35, 685–693.
10.
CutzuF.EdelmanS. (1996). Faithful representations of similarities among three-dimensional shapes in human vision. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 93, 12046–12050.
11.
De ValoisR.L.De ValoisK.K. (1990). Spatial vision. New York: Oxford University Press.
12.
FarahM.H.WilsonK.D.DrainM.TanakaJ.W. (1998). What is “special” about face perception. Psychological Review, 105, 482–498.
13.
GosselinF.SchynsP.G. (2001a). Bubbles: A new technique to reveal the use of visual information in recognition tasks. Vision Research, 41, 2261–2271.
14.
GosselinF.SchynsP.G. (2001b). Why do we SLIP to the basic-level? Computational constraints and their implementation. Psychological Review, 108, 735–758.
15.
HendersonJ.M.FalkR.MinutS.DyerF.C.MahadevanS. (2001). Gaze control for face learning and recognition in humans and machines. In ShipleyT.KellmanP., (Eds.), From fragments to objects: Segmentation processes in vision (pp. 463–481). New York: Elsevier.
16.
HillH.SchynsP.G.AkamatsuS. (1997). Information and viewpoint dependence in face recognition. Cognition, 62, 201–222.
17.
JenkinsJ.CravenB.BruceV.AkamatsuS. (1997). Methods for detecting social signals from the face (Technical Report No. HIP96–39). Kyoto, Japan: Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers.
18.
JolicoeurP. (1990). Identification of disoriented objects: A dual-systems theory. Mind and Language, 5, 387–410.
19.
JolicoeurP.GluckM.KosslynS.M. (1984). Pictures and names: Making the connexion. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 31–53.
20.
LiuZ.KnillD.C.KerstenD. (1995). Object classification for human and ideal observers. Vision Research, 35, 549–568.
21.
MorrisonD.SchynsP.G. (2001). Usage of spatial scales for the categorization of faces, objects and scenes. Psychological Bulletin and Review, 8, 454–469.
PelliD.G. (1997). The Video Toolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442.
24.
PerrettD.I.OramM.W.AshbridgeE. (1998). Evidence accumulation in cell populations responsive to faces: An account of generalisation of recognition without mental transformation. Cognition, 67, 111–145.
25.
PoggioT.EdelmanS. (1990). A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects. Nature, 343, 263–266.
26.
RensinkR.A.O'ReganJ.K.ClarkJ.J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8, 368–373.
SchynsP.G. (1998). Diagnostic recognition: Task constraints, object information and their interactions. Cognition, 67, 147–179.
29.
SchynsP.G.GoldstoneR.L.ThibautJ.P. (1998). The development of features in object concepts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 1–17.
30.
SchynsP.G.OlivaA. (1999). Dr. Angry and Mr. Smile: When categorization flexibly modifies the perception of faces in rapid visual presentations. Cognition, 69, 243–265.
31.
SchynsP.G.RodetL. (1997). Categorization creates functional features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 681–696.
32.
SimoncelliE.P. (1997). Image and Multi-Scale Pyramid Tools [Computer software]. New York: Author.
TanakaJ.FarahM.J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 225–245.
35.
TanakaJ.GauthierI. (1997). Expertise in object and face recognition. In GoldstoneR.L.MedinD.L.SchynsP.G., (Eds.), Perceptual learning (pp. 83–125). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
36.
TanakaJ.SengcoJ.A. (1997). Features and their configuration in face recognition. Memory & Cognition, 25, 583–592.
37.
TanakaJ.TaylorM.E. (1991). Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder?Cognitive Psychology, 15, 121–149.
38.
TanakaJ.W.PresnellL.M. (1999). Color diagnosticity in object recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1140–1153.
39.
TarrM.J.PinkerS. (1989). Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 233–282.
40.
TarrM.J.PinkerS. (1991). Orientation-dependent mechanisms in shape recognition: Further issues. Psychological Science, 2, 207–209.
41.
TrojeN.BülthoffH.H. (1996). Face recognition under varying pose: The role of texture and shape. Vision Research, 36, 1761–1771.
42.
YarbusA.L. (1965). Role of eye movements in the visual process. Moscow, USSR: Nauka.
