Extreme variation in the accessibility of autobiographical memory is a major characteristic of functional amnesia. On the basis of its ability to temporarily disrupt the retrieval of memory material, posthypnotic amnesia (PHA) has been proposed as a laboratory analogue of such amnesia. However, most PHA research has focused on relatively simple, nonpersonal information learned during hypnosis. This experiment extended PHA to autobiographical memory by examining high- and low-hypnotizable subjects' explicit and implicit memory of two autobiographical episodes, one of which was targeted by a PHA suggestion. The effects of PHA were consistent with the major features of functional amnesia: PHA disrupted retrieval of autobiographical information, produced a dissociation between implicit and explicit memory, and was reversible. The nature of PHA's effect on autobiographical memory and the potential utility of a PHA paradigm for investigating functional amnesia are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenJ.J.IaconoW.G.LaravusoJ.J.DunnL.A.
(1995).
An event-related potential investigation of posthypnotic recognition amnesia.
Journal of Abnormal Psychology,
104, 421–430.
2.
American Psychiatric Association.
(1994).
Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.).
Washington, DC: Author.
3.
ArrigoJ.M.PezdekK.
(1997).
Lessons from the study of psychogenic amnesia.
Current Directions in Psychological Science,
6, 148–152.
4.
BarnierA.J.BryantR.A.BriscoeS.
(2001).
Posthypnotic amnesia for material learned before or during hypnosis: Explicit and implicit memory effects.
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis,
49, 286–304.
5.
BarnierA.J.McConkeyK.M.
(1999).
Autobiographical remembering and forgetting: What can hypnosis tell us?International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis,
47, 267–285.
6.
BarnierA.J.WrightJ.
(2002).
Posthypnotic amnesia: Influencing the accessibility and quality of autobiographical memory. Manuscript submitted for publication.
7.
BryantR.A.
(1995).
Autobiographical memory across personalities in dissociative identity disorder: A case report.
Journal of Abnormal Psychology,
104, 625–631.
8.
BryantR.A.BarnierA.J.MallardD.TibbitsR.
(1999).
Posthypnotic amnesia for material learned before hypnosis.
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis,
47, 46–64.
9.
ChristiansonS.-A.EngelbergE.
(1999).
Organization of emotional memories. In
DalgleishT.PowerM. (Eds.),
Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 211–227).
Chichester, England: Wiley.
10.
CoeW.C.
(1978).
The credibility of posthypnotic amnesia: A contextualist's view.
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis,
26, 218–245.
11.
ConwayM.A.Pleydell-PearceC.W.
(2000).
The construction of autobiographical memories in the self-memory system.
Psychological Review,
107, 261–288.
12.
CoxR.E.BarnierA.J.
(2001).
Posthypnotic amnesia for a first romantic relationship: Forgetting the entire relationship vs. forgetting selected events. Manuscript submitted for publication.
GarryM.ManningC.G.LoftusE.F.ShermanS.J.
(1996).
Imagination inflation: Imagining a child event inflates confidence that it occurred.
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,
3, 208–214.
15.
HusemanL.R.GruderC.L.DorstG.
(1987).
A process model of posthypnotic amnesia.
Cognitive Psychology,
19, 33–62.
16.
JacobyL.L.KelleyC.BrownJ.JasechkoJ.
(1989).
Becoming famous overnight: Limits on the ability to avoid unconscious influences of the past.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
56, 326–338.
17.
JohnsonM.K.FoleyM.A.SuengasA.G.RayeC.L.
(1988).
Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,
117, 371–376.
18.
KihlstromJ.F.
(1980).
Posthypnotic amnesia for recently learned material: Interactions with “episodic” and “semantic” memory.
Cognitive Psychology,
12, 227–251.
19.
KihlstromJ.F.
(1985).
Posthypnotic amnesia and the dissociation of memory. In
BowerG.H. (Ed.),
The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 131–178).
Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
20.
KihlstromJ.F.
(1998).
Dissociations and dissociation theory in hypnosis.
Psychological Bulletin,
123, 186–191.
21.
KihlstromJ.F.SchacterD.L.
(1995).
Functional disorders of autobiographical memory. In
BaddeleyA.D.WilsonB.A.WattsF.N. (Eds.),
Handbook of memory disorders (pp. 337–364).
New York: Wiley.
22.
KopelmanM.WilsonB.BaddeleyA.
(1990).
The Autobiographical Memory Interview.
Bury St. Edmunds, England: Thames Valley Test Co.
23.
NeisserU.
(1967).
Cognitive psychology.
New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
24.
SchacterD.L.KihlstromJ.F.
(1989).
Functional amnesia. In
BollerF.GrafmanJ. (Eds.),
Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol.
3, pp. 209–231).
Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
25.
ShorR.E.OrneE.C.
(1962).
Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A.
Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
26.
SpanosN.P.
(1986).
Hypnotic behavior: A social psychological interpretation of amnesia, analgesia, and “trance logic.”Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
9, 449–467.
27.
SquireL.R.McKeeR.
(1992).
Influence of prior events on cognitive judgments in amnesia.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,
18, 106–115.
28.
TulvingE.PearlstoneZ.
(1966).
Availability versus accessibility of information in memory for words.
Journal of Learning and Verbal Behavior,
5, 381–391.
29.
WeitzenhofferA.M.HilgardE.R.
(1962).
Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C.
Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
