Inhibitory tagging is a process that prevents focal attention from revisiting previously checked items in inefficient searches, facilitating search performance. Recent studies suggested that inhibitory tagging is object rather than location based, but it was unclear whether inhibitory tagging operates on moving objects. The present study investigated the tagging effect on moving objects. Participants were asked to search for a moving target among randomly and independently moving distractors. After either efficient or inefficient search, participants performed a probe detection task that measured the inhibitory effect on search items. The inhibitory effect on distractors was observed only after inefficient searches. The present results support the concept of object-based inhibitory tagging.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbramsR.A.DobkinR.S.
(1994).
Inhibition of return: Effects of attentional cueing on eye movement latencies.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,
20, 467–477.
2.
ChunM.M.JiangY.
(1998).
Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention.
Cognitive Psychology,
36, 28–71.
3.
ChunM.M.JiangY.
(1999).
Top-down attentional guidance based on implicit learning of visual covariation.
Psychological Science,
10, 360–365.
4.
GibsonB.S.EgethH.
(1994).
Inhibition of return to object-based and environment-based locations.
Perception & Psychophysics,
55, 323–339.
5.
GibsonB.S.LiL.SkowE.BrownK.CookeL.
(2000).
Searching for one versus two identical targets: When visual search has a memory.
Psychological Science,
11, 324–327.
6.
HorowitzT.S.WolfeJ.M.
(1998).
Visual search has no memory.
Nature,
394, 575–577.
7.
JordanH.TipperS.P.
(1998).
Object-based inhibition of return in static displays.
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,
5, 504–509.
8.
KahnemanD.TreismanA.GibbsB.J.
(1992).
The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information.
Cognitive Psychology,
24, 175–219.
KleinR.M.TaylorT.L.
(1994).
Categories of cognitive inhibition with reference to attention. In
DagenbachD.CarrT.H. (Eds.),
Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 113–150).
San Diego: Academic Press.
11.
KristjánssonA.
(2000).
In search of remembrance: Evidence for memory in visual search.
Psychological Science,
11, 328–332.
12.
MüllerH.J.von MühlenenA.
(2000).
Probing distractor inhibition in visual search: Inhibition of return.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,
26, 1591–1605.
13.
PosnerM.I.CohenY.
(1984).
Components of attention. In
BoumaH.BowhuisD.G. (Eds.),
Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531–556).
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14.
PylyshynZ.W.StormR.W.
(1988).
Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism.
Spatial Vision,
3, 179–197.
15.
SnyderJ.J.KingstoneA.
(2000).
Inhibition of return and visual search: How many separate loci are inhibited?Perception & Psychophysics,
62, 452–458.
16.
TakedaY.YagiA.
(2000).
Inhibitory tagging in visual search can be found if search stimuli remain visible.
Perception & Psychophysics,
62, 927–934.
17.
TipperS.P.DriverJ.WeaverB.
(1991).
Object-centred inhibition of return of visual attention.
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology43A, 289–298.
18.
TipperS.P.WeaverB.JerreatL.M.BurakA.L.
(1994).
Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,
20, 478–499.
19.
Van SelstM.JolicoeurP.
(1994).
A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination.
The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,
47A, 631–650.
20.
WeaverB.LupiánezJ.WatsonF.L.
(1998).
The effects of practice on object-based, location-based, and static-display inhibition of return.
Perception & Psychophysics,
60, 993–1003.
21.
WolfeJ.M.PokornyC.W.
(1990).
Inhibitory tagging in visual search: A failure to replicate.
Perception & Psychophysics,
48, 357–362.
