The present research examined the possibility that repeated exposure may simultaneously produce specific and diffuse effects. In Study 1, participants were presented with 5-ms exposures of 25 stimuli each shown once (single-exposure condition) or with five repetitions of 5 stimuli (repeated-exposure condition). Participants in the repeated-exposure condition subsequently rated their own mood more positively than those in the single-exposure condition. Study 2 examined whether affect generated by subliminal repeated exposures transfers to unrelated stimuli. After a subliminal exposure phase, affective reactions to previously exposed stimuli, to new but similar stimuli, and to stimuli from a different category were obtained. Previously exposed stimuli were rated most positively and novel different stimuli least positively. All stimuli were rated more positively in the repeated-exposure condition than in the single-exposure condition. These findings suggest that affect generated by subliminal repeated exposure is sufficiently diffuse to influence ratings of unrelated stimuli and mood.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aristotle.
(1991).
The art of rhetoric
(Lawson-TancredH.C., Trans.).
London: Penguin.
2.
BarchasP.R.PerlakiK.M.
(1986).
Processing preconsciously acquired information measured in hemispheric asymmetry and selection accuracy.
Behavioral Neuroscience,
100, 343–349.
3.
BonnanoG.A.StillingN.A.
(1986).
Preference, familiarity, and recognition after repeated brief exposure to random geometric shapes.
American Journal of Psychology,
99, 403–415.
4.
BornsteinR.F.
(1989).
Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987.
Psychological Bulletin,
106, 265–289.
5.
BornsteinR.F.D'AgostinoP.R.
(1994).
The attribution and discounting of perceptual fluency: Preliminary tests of a perceptual fluency/attributional model of the mere exposure effect.
Social Cognition,
12(2), 103–128.
6.
BornsteinR.F.LeoneD.R.GalleyD.J.
(1987).
The generalizability of subliminal mere exposure effects: Influence of stimuli perceived without awareness on social behavior.
Journal of Personality and Social Behavior,
53, 1070–1079.
7.
ElliottR.DolanR.J.
(1998).
Neural response during preference and memory judgments for subliminally presented stimuli: A functional neuroimaging study.
Journal of Neuroscience,
18, 4697–4704.
8.
FaiginG.
(1990).
The artist's complete guide to facial expression.
New York: Watson-Guptill.
9.
GordonP.HolyoakK.
(1983).
Implicit learning and generalization of the “mere exposure” effect.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
3, 492–500.
10.
HarrisonA.A.
(1977).
Mere exposure. In
BerkowitzL. (Ed.),
Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol.
10, pp. 610–646).
New York: Academic Press.
11.
Kunst-WilsonW.R.ZajoncR.B.
(1980).
Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized.
Science,
207, 557–558.
12.
MandlerG.NakamuraY.van ZandtB.J.S.
(1987).
Nonspecific effects of exposure on stimuli that cannot be recognized.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,
13, 646–648.
13.
MorelandR.L.ZajoncR.B.
(1976).
A strong test of exposure effects.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,
12, 170–179.
14.
MurphyS.T.MonahanJ.L.ZajoncR.B.
(1995).
Additivity of nonconscious affect: Combined effects of priming and exposure.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
69, 589–602.
15.
MurphyS.T.ZajoncR.B.
(1993).
Affect, cognition, and awareness: Affective priming with suboptimal and optimal stimulus.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
64, 723–739.
16.
NiedenthalP.M.
(1988).
Unconscious affect in social cognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
17.
SeamonJ.G.BrodyN.KauffD.M.
(1983a).
Affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized: Effects of shadowing, masking, and cerebral laterality.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,
9, 544–555.
18.
SeamonJ.G.BrodyN.KauffD.M.
(1983b).
Affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized: II. Effect of delay between study and test.
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,
21, 87–189.
19.
SeamonJ.G.MarshR.L.BrodyN.
(1989).
Critical importance of exposure duration for affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,
10, 465–469.
20.
SmithE.R.
(1998).
Mental representation and memory. In
GilbertD.T.FiskeS.T.LindzeyG. (Eds.),
The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 391–445).
Boston: McGraw-Hill.
21.
SmithP.B.BondM.B.
(1993).
Social psychology across cultures.
New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
22.
SnellA.GibbsB.J.VareyC.
(1995).
Intuitive hedonics: Consumer beliefs about the dynamics of liking.
Journal of Consumer Psychology,
4(1), 33–60.
23.
SokolovY.N.
(1963).
Perception and the conditioned reflex.
Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
24.
WhalenP.J.RauchS.L.EtcoffN.L.McInerneyS.C.LeeM.B.JenikeM.A.
(1998).
Masked representations of emotional facial expressions modulate amygdala activity without explicit knowledge.
Journal of Neuroscience,
18, 411–418.
25.
WilsonW.R.
(1979).
Feeling more than you can know: Exposure effects without learning.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
37, 811–821.
26.
WinkielmanP.BerridgeK.WilbargerJ.
(2000, February).
Approach/appetitive behavior and unconscious affect induced by affective priming. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Nashville, TN.
ZajoncR.B.
(1968).
Attitudinal effects of mere exposure.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
9, 1–27.
29.
ZajoncR.B.
(1971).
Attraction, affiliation, and attachment. In
EisenbergJ.E.DillonW.S. (Eds.),
Man and beast: Comparative social behavior (pp. 141–179).
Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
30.
ZajoncR.B.
(1998).
Emotions. In
GilbertD.T.FiskeS.T.LindzeyG. (Eds.),
The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 591–632).
Boston: McGraw-Hill.
31.
ZajoncR.B.WilsonW.R.RajeckiD.W.
(1975).
Affiliation and social discrimination produced by brief exposure in day-old domestic chicks.
Animal Behavior,
23, 131–138.
