Several neuroimaging studies have reported that older adults show weaker activations in some brain areas together with stronger activations in other areas, compared with younger adults performing the same task. This pattern may reflect neural recruitment that compensates for age-related neural declines. The recruitment hypothesis was tested in a visual laterality study that investigated age differences in the efficiency of bihemispheric processing. Letter-matching tasks of varying complexity were performed under two conditions: (a) matching letters projected to the same visual field (hemisphere) and (b) matching letters projected to opposite visual fields (hemispheres). As predicted by the recruitment hypothesis, older adults generally performed better in the bilateral than unilateral condition, whereas younger adults showed this pattern only for the most complex task. We discuss the relation between these results and neuroimaging evidence for recruitment, and the relevance of the present bihemispheric advantage to other evidence for age-related changes in interhemispheric transfer.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaltesP.B.LindenbergerU. (1997). Emergence of a powerful connection between sensory and cognitive functions across the adult life span: A new window to the study of cognitive aging?Psychology & Aging, 12, 12–21.
2.
BanichM.T. (1998). The missing link: The role of interhemispheric interaction in attentional processing. Brain and Cognition, 36, 128–157.
3.
BanichM.T.KarolD.L. (1992). The sum of the parts does not equal the whole: Evidence from bihemispheric processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 763–784.
CabezaR.GradyC.L.NybergL.McIntoshA.R.TulvingE.KapurS.JenningsJ.M.HouleS.CraikF.I.M. (1997). Age-related differences in neural activity during memory encoding and retrieval: A positron emission tomography study. The Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 391–400.
6.
CabezaR.McIntoshA.R.TulvingE.NybergL.GradyC.L. (1997). Age-related differences in effective neural connectivity during encoding and recall. Neuro-Report, 8, 3479–3483.
7.
CohenJ.D.MacWhinneyB.FlattM.ProvostJ. (1993). PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 257–271.
8.
CraikF.I.M.ByrdM. (1982). Aging and cognitive deficits: The role of attentional resources. In CraikF.I.M.TrehubS., (Eds.), Aging and cognitive processes (pp. 191–211). New York: Plenum Press.
9.
DriesenN.R.RazN. (1995). The influence of sex, age, and handedness on corpus callosum morphology: A meta-analysis. Psychobiology, 23, 240–247.
10.
GoldsteinG.ShelleyC. (1981). Does the right hemisphere age more rapidly than the left?Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 3, 65–78.
11.
GradyC.L.HaxbyJ.V.HorwitzB.SchapiroM.B.RapoportS.I. (1992). Dissociation of object and spatial vision in human extrastriate cortex: Age-related changes in activation of regional cerebral blood flow measured with [15O] water and positron emission tomography. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4, 23–34.
12.
GradyC.L.MaisogJ.M.HorwitzB.UngerleiderL.G.MentisM.J.SalernoJ.A.PietriniP.WagnerE.HaxbyJ.V. (1994). Age-related changes in cortical blood flow activation during visual processing of faces and location. The Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 1450–1462.
13.
HartleyA.A. (1992). Attention. In CraikF.I.M.SalthouseT.A., (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (pp. 3–50). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14.
HoptmanM.J.DavidsonR.J.GudmundssonA.SchreiberR.T.ErshlerW.B. (1996). Age differences in visual evoked potential estimates of interhemispheric transfer. Neuropsychology, 10, 263–271.
15.
JeevesM.A.MoesP. (1996). Interhemispheric transfer time differences related to aging and gender. Neuropsychologia, 34, 627–636.
16.
JonidesJ.SchumacherE.H.KoeppeR.A.SmithE.E.LauberE.AwhE. (1997). Verbal working memory load affects regional brain activation as measured by PET. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 462–475.
KinsbourneM. (1980). Attentional dysfunctions and the elderly: Theoretical models and research perspectives. In PoonL.W.FozardJ.L.CermakL.S.ArenbergD.ThompsonL.W., (Eds.), New directions in memory and aging (pp. 113–129). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19.
KinsbourneM.ByrdM. (1985). Word load and visual hemifield shape recognition: Priming and interference effects. In PosnerM.I.MarinO.S.M., (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 529–543). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20.
LiedermanJ. (1998). The dynamics of interhemispheric collaboration and hemispheric control. Brain and Cognition, 36, 193–208.
21.
MaddenD.J.TurkingtonT.G.ProvenzaleJ.M.DennyL.L.HawkT.C.GottlobL.R.ColemanR.E. (1999). Adult age differences in the functional neuroanatomy of verbal recognition memory. Human Brain Mapping, 7, 115–135.
22.
MoesP.JeevesM.A.CookK. (1995). Bimanual coordination with aging: Implications for interhemispheric transfer. Developmental Neuropsychology, 11(1), 23–40.
23.
RappB.McCloskeyM. (1997). Brain activation and sentence comprehension. Science, 27, 912–913.
24.
Reuter-LorenzP.A.JonidesJ.SmithE.HartleyA.MillerA.MarshuetzC.KoeppeR. (in press). Age differences in the front lateralization of verbal and spatial working memory revealed by PET. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
25.
SalatD.WardA.KayeJ.A.JanowskyJ.S. (1997). Sex differences in the corpus callosum with aging. Neurobiology of Aging, 18(2), 1–7.
ScheibelA.B. (1996). Structural and functional changes in the aging brain. In BirrenJ.E.SchaieK.W., (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (pp. 105–128). San Diego: Academic Press.
28.
SmithE.E.JonidesJ.KoeppeR.A. (1996). Dissociating verbal and spatial working memory using PET. Cerebral Cortex, 6, 11–20.
