Although James and Freud are generally not considered scientific by experimental psychologists, both wrote about their view of what a scientific psychology should look like. Their radically different philosophical epistemologies and historical origins are reviewed, to provide an understanding of their respective visions for psychology. James took his stand on a new metaphysical foundation for the way experiments should be conducted with his formulation of radical empiricism. Freud attempted a neurological explanation of the unconscious in his “Project for a Scientific Psychology.” Remarkably, their definitions of psychology as a science had a similar ring. Likely, this is because both took a phenomenological position with regard to how they defined science, which is also probably the primary reason their ideas on the subject have always been rejected by experimentalists. The humanistic implications of the neuroscience revolution, however, have caused a reassessment of their respective positions, as philosophical questions about the nature of consciousness have brought both Freud and James back into vogue, but in new and unexpected ways.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anonymous. (1887). Grande hysterie. American Journal of Insanity, 44, 369.
2.
BoringE.G. (1929). A history of experimental psychology. New York: The Century Co.
3.
BoringE.G. (1950). A history of experimental psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
4.
BreuerJ.FreudS. (1953). Studies in hysteria. In StracheyJ., (Ed. and Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 2). London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1895)
5.
BurnhamJ.C. (1967). Psychoanalysis and American medicine: 1894–1918; Medicine, science, and culture. New York: International Universities Press.
6.
CrickF.KochC. (1992, September). The problem of consciousness. Scientific American, 267, 152–159.
7.
EllenbergerH. (1970). Discovery of the unconscious. New York: Basic Books.
8.
FreudS. (1953). An autobiographical study. In StracheyJ., (Ed. and Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 20, pp. 3–76). London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1925)
9.
FreudS. (1953). The interpretation of dreams. In StracheyJ., (Ed. and Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vols. 4–5). London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1900)
10.
FreudS. (1953). New introductory lectures on psychoanalysis. In StracheyJ., (Ed. and Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 22, pp. 3–184). London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1933)
11.
FreudS. (1953). Project for a scientific psychology. In StracheyJ., (Ed. and Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud; Vol. 1, pp. 283–388). London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1895)
12.
GayF.P. (1938). The open mind: Elmer Ernest Southard, 1876–1920. Chicago: Normandie House.
13.
GiffordG.E.Jr., (Ed.). (1978). Psychoanalysis, psychotherapy, and the American medical scene, 1894–1944. New York: Science/History Press.
14.
HaleN.G. (1971). Freud and the Americans: The beginnings of psychoanalysis in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
HenningsenP. (1998). Self-recognition in the mirror of another? On the significance of cognitive neuroscience for psychoanalysis. Journal of Psychotherapy, Psychosomatic Medicine, and Psychology, 48, 78–87.
16.
JamesW. (1890). Principles of psychology (2 vols.). New York: Henry Holt.
17.
JamesW. (1894). Notice of Pierre Janet's État mental des hystèriques, and L'amnesie continue; J. Breuer & S. Freud's Ueber den psychischen Mechanismus hysterischer Phänomene; and L. E. Whipple's Philosophy of mental healing. Psychological Review, 1, 195–200.
18.
JamesW. (1902). The varieties of religious experience. New York: Longman's.
19.
JonesE. (1955). The life and work of Sigmund Freud: Vol. 2. Years of maturity, 1901–1919. New York: Basic Books.
20.
JungC.G. (n.d.). Excized eulogy to James Jackson Putnam. Unpublished manuscript in the typescript of the English translation of Memories, dreams, and reflections. (On deposit in the Countway Library of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston; cited with permission)
21.
KardinerA. (1977). My analysis with Freud: Reminiscences. New York: Norton.
22.
KimbleG. (1990). A search for principles in Principles of Psychology. Psychological Science, 1, 151–155.
23.
ModellA.H. (1994). Neural darwinism and a conceptual crisis in psychoanalysis. International Review of Neurobiology, 37, 335–345.
24.
PutnamJ.J. (1915). Human motives. Boston: Badger.
25.
RosenzweigS. (1992). Freud, Jung, and Hall the king-maker: The historic expedition to America, 1909, with G. Stanley Hall as host and William James as guest. St. Louis: Rana House.
26.
SchmittF.O. (1984). Molecular regulators of brain function: A new view. Neuroscience, 13, 991–1001.
27.
SchmittF.O. (1990). The never-ceasing search. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.
28.
TaylorE.I. (1982, March-April). The Boston School of Psychotherapy: Science, healing, and consciousness in 19th century New England. The 1982 Lowell Lectures for the Boston Medical Library and the Massachusetts Medical Society, Boston.
29.
TaylorE.I. (1983). William James on exceptional mental states: Reconstruction of the 1896 Lowell Lectures. New York: Scribner's.
30.
TaylorE.I. (1988). On the first use of ‘Psychoanalysis’ at the Massachusetts General Hospital, 1903–1905. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 43, 447–471.
31.
TaylorE.I. (1992, August). William James on consciousness and Freud's reply. Invited address presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
32.
TaylorE.I. (1995, December). “The future of psychology belongs to your work”: William James on Sigmund Freud. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Boston.
33.
TaylorE.I. (1996). William James on consciousness beyond the margin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34.
TaylorE.I. (1998). William James on the demise of positivism in American psychology. In RieberR.SalzingerK., (Eds.), Psychology: Theoretical and historical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 101–134). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
35.
TaylorE.I.WozniakR., (Eds.). (1996). Pure experience: The response to William James. Bristol, England: Thommes.
36.
TukeD.H. (1892). Dictionary of psychological medicine. London: J.A. Churchill.
37.
VelmansM. (1993). A reflexive science of consciousness. In Experimental and theoretical studies of consciousness (Ciba Foundation Symposium 174, pp. 81–99). Chichester, England: John Wiley.
