When observers see motion that is not really there, they can nonetheless show evidence of motion priming. And when observers do not see motion that is really there, they also show evidence for motion priming. Evidently, the process responsible for establishing motion correspondence is sensitive to contextual information, and this sensitivity is modulated at preconscious levels of visual analysis.
BlakeR. (1989). A neural theory of binocular rivalry. Psychological Review, 96, 145–167.
3.
BlakeR.YuK.FukudaH.LokeyM. (1998). Binocular rivalry and motion perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 46–60.
4.
BurkeL. (1952). On the tunnel effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 121–138.
5.
CheesmanJ.MerikleP.M. (1984). Priming with and without awareness. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 387–395.
6.
FowlerC.A.WoldfordG.SladeR.TassinaryL. (1981). Lexical access with and without awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 341–362.
7.
FoxR. (1991). Binocular rivalry. In ReganD.M., (Ed.), Binocular vision and psychophysics (pp. 93–110). London: MacMillan Press.
8.
GengerelliJ.A. (1948). Apparent movement in relation to homogeneous and heterogeneous stimulations of the cerebral hemispheres. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 592–599.
9.
GibsonJ.J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
10.
JonesE.E.BrunerJ.S. (1954). Expectancy in apparent visual movement. British Journal of Psychology, 45, 157–165.
11.
LehmkuhleS.W.FoxR. (1975). Effect of binocular rivalry suppression on the motion after-effect. Vision Research, 15, 855–859.
12.
LuZ.-L.SperlingG. (1995). The functional architecture of human visual motion perception. Vision Research, 35, 2697–2722.
13.
MaunsellJ.H.R. (1995). The brain's visual world: Representation of visual targets in cerebral cortex. Science, 270, 764–768.
14.
McNamaraT.P. (1992). Priming and constraints it places on theories of memory and retrieval. Psychological Review, 99, 650–662.
15.
MichotteA. (1963). The perception of causality (MilesT.R.MilesE., Trans.). New York: Basic Books. (Original work published 1946)
16.
O'SheaR.P.CrassiniB. (1981). Interocular transfer of the motion aftereffect is not reduced by binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 21, 801–804.
17.
RamachandranV.S. (1975). Suppression of apparent movement during binocular rivalry. Nature, 256, 122–123.
18.
RamachandranV.S.AnstisS. (1983). Extrapolation of motion path in human visual perception. Vision Research, 23, 83–85.
19.
ReichardtW. (1961). Autocorrelation, a principle for the evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system. In RosenblithW.A., (Ed.), Sensory communication (pp. 303–317). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
