Although hearing is classically considered a temporal sense, everyday listening suggests that subtle spatial properties constitute an important part of what people know about the world through sound. Typically neglected in psychoacoustics research, the ability to perceive the precise sizes of objects on the basis of sound was investigated during the routine event of dropping wooden dowels of different lengths onto a hard surface. In two experiments, the ordinal and metrical success of naive listeners was related to length but not to the simple acoustic variables (duration, amplitude, frequency) likely to be related to it. Additional analysis suggests the potential relevance of an object's inertia tensor in constraining perception of that object's length, analogous to the case that has been made for perceiving length by effortful touch.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CarelloC.FitzpatrickP.FlascherI.TurveyM.T. (1998). Inertial eigenvalues, rod density, and rod diameter in length perception by dynamic touch. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 89–100.
2.
FitzpatrickP.CarelloC.TurveyM.T. (1994). Eigenvalues of the inertia tensor and exteroception by the “muscular sense.”Neuroscience, 60, 551–568.
3.
FowlerC.A. (1990). Sound-producing sources as objects of perception: Rate normalization and nonspeech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 1236–1249.
4.
FowlerC.A. (1991). Auditory perception is not special: We see the world, we feel the world, we hear the world. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 2910–2915.
5.
FreedD.J. (1990). Auditory correlates of perceived mallet hardness for a set of recorded percussive events. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87, 311–322.
6.
GaverW.W. (1988). Everyday listening and auditory icons. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
7.
GaverW.W. (1993a). How do we hear in the world? Explorations in ecological acoustics. Ecological Psychology, 5, 285–313.
8.
GaverW.W. (1993b). What in the world do we hear? An ecological approach to auditory event perception. Ecological Psychology, 5, 1–29.
9.
GibsonJ.J. (1963). The useful dimensions of sensitivity. American Psychologist, 18, 1–15.
10.
GibsonJ.J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
11.
HowardJ.H. (1983). Perception of simulated propeller cavitation. Human Factors, 25, 643–655.
12.
JenkinsJ.J. (1985). Acoustic information for places, objects, and events. In WarrenW.H.ShawR.E., (Eds.), Persistence and change: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Event Perception (pp. 115–138). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13.
LakatosS.McAdamsS.CausséR. (1997). The representation of auditory source characteristics: Simple geometric form. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1180–1190.
14.
LiX.LoganR.J.PastoreR.E. (1991). Perception of acoustic source characteristics: Walking sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90, 3036–3049.
15.
ReppB.H. (1987). The sound of two hands clapping: An exploratory study. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 81, 1100–1110.
16.
SolomonH.Y.TurveyM.T. (1988). Haptically perceiving the distances reachable with hand-held objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 404–427.
17.
TurveyM.T. (1996). Dynamic touch. American Psychologist, 51, 1134–1152.
18.
TurveyM.T.BurtonG.AmazeenE.ButwillM.CarelloC. (1998). Perceiving the width and height of a hand-held object by dynamic touch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 35–48.
19.
TurveyM.T.CarelloC. (1995). Dynamic touch. In EpsteinW.RogersS., (Eds.), Handbook of perception and cognition: Vol. 5. Perception of space and motion (pp. 401–490). New York: Academic Press.
20.
Van DerveerN.J. (1979a, June). Acoustic information for event perception. Paper presented at the Celebration in Honor of Eleanor J. Gibson, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
21.
Van DerveerN.J. (1979b, June). Confusion errors in the identification of environmental sounds. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, Cambridge, MA.
22.
WarrenW.H.VerbruggeR.R. (1984). Auditory perception of breaking and bouncing events: A case study in ecological acoustics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 704–712.
