People sometimes find themselves making movement errors that represent the ironic opposite of what they intended to do. These studies examined this tendency in the case of putting a golf ball and swinging a handheld pendulum, and found that ironic errors were particularly likely when participants who were instructed to avoid them tried to do so under mental load or physical load. The idea that such errors may be prompted by a monitoring process that increases sensitivity to the most undesirable outcome of an intention was supported by the finding of a tendency for ironic errors to be more evident when participants were allowed to monitor their action visually than when they could not.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnsfieldM.E.WegnerD.M. (1996). The feeling of doing. In GollwitzerP.M.BarghJ.A., (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (pp. 482–506). New York: Guilford Press.
2.
AnsfieldM.E.WegnerD.M.BowserR. (1996). Ironic effects of sleep urgency. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34, 523–531.
3.
ArnoldM.B. (1946). On the mechanism of suggestion and hypnosis. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 107–128.
4.
BarghJ.A.ChenM.BurrowsL. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230–244.
5.
CarpenterW.G. (1884). Principles of mental physiology, with their applications to the training and discipline of the mind and study of its morbid conditions. New York: Appleton.
6.
ChevreulM.E. (1833). Lettre à M. Ampère sure une classe particulaires. Review des Deux Mondes, 2, 258–266.
7.
DijksterhuisA.van KnippenburgA. (in press). Automatic social behavior or how to win a game of Trivial Pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
8.
EastonR.D.ShorR.E. (1975). Information processing analysis of the Chevreul pendulum illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 231–236.
9.
EastonR.D.ShorR.E. (1976). An experimental analysis of the Chevreul pendulum illusion. Journal of General Psychology, 95, 111–125.
10.
EastonR.D.ShorR.E. (1977). Augmented and delayed feedback in the Chevreul pendulum illusion. Journal of General Psychology, 97, 167–177.
11.
GordonA.M.RosenbaumD.A. (1984). Conscious and subconscious arm movements: Application of signal detection theory to motor control. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 22, 214–216.
12.
JamesR.J. (1983). Acute effects of instrumental augmented feedback on self-control and automaticity of postural tremor associated with local muscle fatigue. Behavioral Engineering, 8, 138–145.
13.
JamesW. (1890). Principles of psychology. New York: Holt.
14.
JastrowJ. (1937). Chevreul as psychologist. Scientific Monthly, 44, 487–496.
15.
MacraeC.N.BodenhausenG.V.MilneA.B.FordR.L. (1997). On the regulation of recollection: The intentional forgetting of stereotypical memories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 709–719.
WegnerD.M. (1997). When the antidote is the poison: Ironic mental control processes. Psychological Science, 8, 148–150.
18.
WegnerD.M.BroomeA.BlumbergS. (1997). Ironic effects of trying to relax under stress. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35, 11–21.
19.
WegnerD.M.ErberR. (1992). The hyperaccessibility of suppressed thoughts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 903–912.
20.
WegnerD.M.ErberR.ZanakosS. (1993). Ironic processes in the mental control of mood and mood-related thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1093–1104.
21.
WilsonT.D.CapitmanJ.A. (1982). Effects of script availability on social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 11–20.
