Participants who had to recall 12 childhood events (a difficult task) were more likely to infer that they could not remember large parts of their childhood than participants who had to recall 4 events (an easy task), although the former recalled three times as many events. This pattern of results suggests that memory judgments are based on the experienced ease or difficulty of recall. Accordingly, the negative impact of recalling 12 events was attenuated when participants were led to attribute the experienced difficulty to the task rather than to the poor quality of their memory. The findings emphasize the role of subjective experiences and attribution in metamemory judgments.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeggI.ArmourV.KerrT. (1985). On believing what we remember. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 17, 199–214.
2.
BelliR.F.LoftusE.F. (1994). Recovered memories of childhood abuse: A source monitoring perspective. In LynnS.J.RhueJ., (Eds.), Dissociation: Theory, clinical, and research perspectives (pp. 415–433). New York: Guilford Press.
3.
BelliR.F.WinkielmanP.ReadJ.D.SchwarzN.LynnS.J. (in press). Recalling more childhood events leads to judgments of poorer memory: Implications for the recovered/false memory debate. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
4.
CeciS.J.LoftusE.F. (1994). ‘Memory work’: A royal road to false memories?Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8, 351–364.
5.
DixonR.A. (1989). Questionnaire research on metamemory and aging. In PoonL.W.RubinD.C.WilsonB.A., (Eds.), Everyday cognition in adulthood and late life (pp. 394–415). New York: Cambridge University Press.
6.
HerrmannD.J. (1982). Know thy memory: The use of questionnaires to assess and study memory. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 434–452.
7.
JacobyL.L.KelleyC.M.DywanJ. (1989). Memory attributions. In RoedigerH.L.IIICraikF.I.M., (Eds.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honor of Endel Tulving (pp. 391–422). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
KelleyC.M.JacobyL.L. (1996). Memory attributions: Remembering, knowing, and feeling of knowing. In RederL.M., (Ed.), Implicit memory and metacognition (pp. 287–308). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9.
KelleyC.M.LindsayD.S. (1993). Remembering mistaken for knowing: Ease of retrieval as a basis for confidence in answers to general knowledge questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 1–24.
10.
LindsayD.S.KelleyC.M. (1996). Creating illusions of familiarity in a cued recall remember/know paradigm. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 197–211.
11.
LindsayD.S.ReadJ.D. (1994). Psychotherapy and memories of childhood sexual abuse: A cognitive perspective. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8, 281–338.
12.
RosenthalR.RosnowR.L. (1985). Contrast analysis: Focused comparisons in the analysis of variance. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
13.
RossC.A. (1989). Multiple personality disorder: Diagnosis, clinical features, and treatment. New York: Wiley.
14.
SchwarzN. (in press). Accessible content and accessibility experiences: The interplay of declarative and experiential information in judgment. In MetcalfeJ.StrackF., (Eds.), Metacognition [Special issue]. Personality and Social Psychology Review.
15.
SchwarzN.BlessH.StrackF.KlumppG.Rittenauer-SchatkaH.SimonsA. (1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 195–202.
16.
SchwarzN.CloreG.L. (1996). Feelings and phenomenal experiences. In HigginsE.T.KruglanskiA., (Eds.), Social psychology: A handbook of basic principles (pp. 433–465). New York: Guilford Press.
17.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–232.
18.
WänkeM.SchwarzN.BlessH. (1995). The availability heuristic revisited: Experienced ease of retrieval in mundane frequency estimates. Acta Psychologica, 89, 83–90.
19.
WhittleseaB.W.A. (1993). Illusions of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1235–1253.
