This article develops an empirically-oriented actor-centred power framework. Building on work of Lukes and Gaventa, the article outlines how visible, hidden and invisible power can be understood and operationalised. The article considers how actors can realise their interests through decision making and the control of resources (visible power); backdoor machinations and institutional organisation (hidden); and the structural-discursive empowerment of the actor and the creation and use of discourse (invisible). Furthermore, a regime evolution approach is sketched that facilitates understanding the dialectical interplay between society and the formal political arena, and that focuses the measurement of power on societal outcomes – not political outputs.
AckermanF.HeinzerlingL. (2001) ‘Pricing the Priceless: Cost-Benefit Analysis of Environmental Protection’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review150(5), pp. 1553–1584.
2.
AlcottB. (2005) ‘Jevons’ Paradox’, Ecological Economics54(1), pp. 9–21.
3.
BachrachP.BaratzM. (1962) ‘The Two Faces of Power’, American Political Science Review56(4), pp. 947–952.
4.
BaumgartnerF.BerryJ.HojnackiM.KimballD.LeechB. (2009) Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses and Why, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
BourdieuP.WacquantL. (2001) ‘Neoliberal Newspeak: Notes on the New Planetary Vulgate’, Radical Philosophy105(1), pp. 1–6.
7.
CairneyP. (2013) ‘What is Evolutionary Theory and How Does It Inform Policy Studies?’, Policy and Politics41(2), pp. 279–298.
8.
CernyP.G. (2014) ‘Transnational Neopluralism and the Process of Governance’ in PayneA.PhillipsN. (eds.), Handbook of the International Political Economy of Governance, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 48–68.
9.
CleggS. (1979) The Theory of Power and Organisation, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
CrensonM.A. (1971) The Un-Politics of Air Pollution: A Study of Non-Decisionmaking in the Cities, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
12.
DahlR. (1957) ‘The Concept of Power’, Behavioral Science2, pp. 201–205.
13.
DahlR. (1961) Who Governs? Power and Democracy in an American City, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
14.
DahlR.LindblomC. (1976) Politics, Economics and Welfare, Chicago: University of Chicago.
15.
DowdingK. (2003) ‘Resources, Power and Systematic Luck: A Response to Barry’, Politics, Philosophy and Economics2(3), pp. 305–322.
16.
DurA. (2008) ‘Measuring Interest Group Influence in the EU: A Note on Methodology’, European Union Politics9(4), pp. 559–577.
17.
DürA.De BièvreD. (2007) ‘The Question of Interest Group Influence’, Journal of Public Policy37(1), pp. 1–12.
18.
FoucaultM. (1982) ‘The Subject and Power’, Critical Inquiry8(4), pp. 777–795.
19.
FriedmanL.C.DaynardR.A.BanthinC.N. (2005) ‘How Tobacco-Friendly Science Escapes Scrutiny in the Courtroom’, Journal of Public Health95(s1), pp. s16–s20.
20.
FuchsD. (2005) ‘Commanding Heights? The Strength and Fragility of Business Power in Global Politics’, Paper presented at the Millennium Annual Conference, London.
21.
GallieW. (1955) ‘Essentially Contested Concepts’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society56, pp. 167–198.
22.
GaventaJ. (1980) Power and Powerlessness: Quiescence and Rebellion in an Appalachian Valley, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
GaventaJ. (2006) ‘Finding the Spaces for Change: A Power Analysis’, IDS Bulletin37, pp. 6–23.
24.
HayC. (1997) ‘State of the Art: Divided by a Common Language – Political Theory and the Concept of Power’, Politics17(1), pp. 45–52.
25.
HaywardC.LukesS. (2008) ‘Nobody to Shoot? Power, Structure and Agency – A Dialogue’, Journal of Power1(1), pp. 5–20.
26.
HeldD.McGrewA. (2003) The Global Transformations Reader, Cambridge: Polity Press.
27.
HojnackiM.KimballD.C.BaumgartnerF.R.BerryJ.M.LeechB.L. (2012) ‘Studying Organizational Advocacy and Influence: Reexamining Interest Group Research’, Annual Review of Political Science15, pp. 379–399.
28.
HylandJ.L. (1995) Democratic Theory: The Philosophical Foundations, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
29.
LindblomC.E. (1977) Politics and Markets: The World’s Political Economic Systems, New York: Basic Books.
30.
LukesS. (1974) Power: A Radical View, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
McFarlandA.S. (2007) ‘Neopluralism’, Annual Review of Political Science10, pp. 45–66.
34.
McGarityT.O. (2003) ‘Our Science is Sound Science and Their Science is Junk Science: Science-Based Strategies for Avoiding Accountability and Responsibility for Risk-Producing Products and Activities’, University of Kansas Law Review52(4), pp. 897–937.
35.
MorrissP. (2002) Power: A Philosophical Analysis, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
