Donald Schön’s assertion that becoming an effective professional requires more than technical rationality underpins the pedagogy of Masters in Public Administration (MPA) programmes. This article explores how public administrators can be taught to think reflectively and reflexively about the limits of control in the context of decision making and regulatory policy appraisal. It reports on an in-class pedagogical experiment on illusions of control used to generate a real-life experience of the cognitive and emotional dimensions of control. By doing so, the article introduces the concept of ‘regulatory humility’ and contributes to the literature on experiments as pedagogical tools, and to debates on teaching methods in public administration and political science.
AhmadY.Ry NielsenJ.C.RaineJ.SynnottM. (eds.) (2013) ‘Developing the Reflexive Public Manager’, Teaching Public Administration31(3), pp. 3–5.
2.
AschS. (1956) ‘Studies of Independence and Conformity: A Minority of One against a Unanimous Majority’, Psychological Monographs70(9), pp. 1–70.
3.
AyresI.BraithwaiteJ. (1992) Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate, New York: Oxford University Press.
4.
BrunerA.RevuskyS.H. (1961) ‘Collateral Behaviour in Humans’, Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behaviour4, pp. 349–350.
5.
CunliffeA.L.JunS.J. (2005) ‘The Need for Reflexivity in Public Administration’, Administration and Society37(2), pp. 225–242.
6.
CunninghamB. (1997) ‘Experiential Learning’, Public Administration Education3(2), pp. 219–227.
7.
DunlopC.A.RadaelliC.M. (eds.) (2015a) International Handbook on Impact Assessment, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
8.
DunlopC.A.RadaelliC.M. (2015b) ‘Overcoming Illusions of Control: How to Nudge and Teach Regulatory Humility’ in AlemannoA.SibonyA.-L. (eds.), Nudging in Europe: What Can EU Law Learn from Behavioural Sciences?, London: Bloomsbury Press.
9.
EtzioniA. (1989) ‘Humble Decision-Making’, Harvard Business Review89(4), pp. 122–126.
10.
EtzioniE. (2014) ‘Humble Decision-Making Theory’, Public Management Review16(5), pp. 611–619.
11.
Fenton-O’CreevyM.NicholsonN.SoaneE.WillmanP. (2003) ‘Trading on Illusions: Unrealistic Perceptions of Control and Trading Performance’, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology76, pp. 53–68.
12.
FriedmanV.J. (2001) ‘The Individual as Agent of Organizational Learning’ in DierkesM.Berthoin AntalA.ChildJ.NonakaI. (eds.), Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 398–414.
13.
GordonM.E.SladeL.A.SchmittN. (1986) ‘The “Science of the Sophomore” Revisited: From Conjecture to Empiricism’, Academy of Management Review11(1), pp. 191–207.
14.
HenslinJ.M. (1967) ‘Craps and Magic’, American Journal of Sociology73, pp. 316–330.
15.
HM Treasury (2005) Reducing Administrative Burdens: Effective Inspection and Enforcement, Philip Hampto, March, London: HMSO.
16.
HoodC. (2010) The Blame Game: Spin, Bureaucracy and Self-Preservation in Government, Princeton, NJ: Princeton Uni-versity Press.
17.
HortonM. (1990) The Long Haul, New York, NY: Doubleday.
18.
JohnP. (2014) ‘Policy Entrepreneurship in UK Central Government: The Behavioural Insights Team and the Uses of RCTS’, Public Policy and Administration29(3), pp. 257–267.
LangerE.J. (1975) ‘The Illusion of Control’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology32(2), pp. 311–328.
21.
LernerM.J. (1965) ‘Evaluation of Performance as a Function of Performer’s Reward and Attractiveness’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology5, pp. 319–325.
22.
LernerM.J.MatthewsG. (1967) ‘Reactions to Suffering of Others under Conditions of Indirect Responsibility’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology1, pp. 355–360.
LodgeM. (2013) ‘Crisis, Resources and the State: Executive Politics in the Age of the Depleted State’, Political Studies Review11, pp. 378–390.
25.
McCullochA. (2009) ‘The Student as Co-Producer: Learning from Public Administration about the Student-University Relationship’, Studies in Higher Education34(2), pp. 171–183.
26.
MeerF-B. van derMarksP. (2013) ‘Teaching and Learning Reflection in MPA Programs: Towards a Strategy’, Teaching Public Administration31(1), pp. 42–54.
27.
MoffettJ. (1994) The Universal Schoolhouse: Spiritual Awakening Through Education, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
28.
RoweM. (2013) ‘Thinking about Behaviour and Conformity in Groups: Some Social Psychological Resources’, Teaching Public Administration31(2), pp. 218–225.
29.
SchönD.A. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professions Think in Action, New York: Basic Books.
30.
SeligmanM.E.P. (1972) Helplessness: On Depression, Development and Death, San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman.
31.
StarrB.J.KatkinE.S. (1969) ‘The Clinician as the Aberrant Actuary: Illusory Correlation and the Incomplete Sentence Blank’, Journal of Abnormal Psychology74, pp. 670–675.
32.
SteffeL.P.ThompsonP.W. (2000) ‘Teaching Experiment Methodology: Underlying Principles and Essential Elements’ in LeshR.KellyA.E. (eds.), Research Design in Mathematics and Science Education, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 267–307.
33.
ThalerR.H.SunsteinC.R. (2008) Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
34.
VickersG. (1965) The Art of Judgment, London: Chapman & Hall.
35.
WhiteR.W. (1959) ‘Motivation Reconsidered: The Concept of Competence’, Psychological Review66, pp. 297–333.
36.
WildavskyA. (1979) Speaking Truth to Power: The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis, Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
